Customized Content Delivery for Graduate Management Education: Application to Business Statistics

References

• Atwater, J.; Pittman, P. 2006. Facilitating systemic thinking in business classes, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 273.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W; O'Toole, J. 2005. How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharath, R.; Drosen, J. 1994. Neural Net Computing, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Camuffo, A.; Gerli, F. 2004. An integrated competency-based approach to management education, International Journal of Training & Development, 8(4), 240.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, B.; Hui, L.; Zhang, J.; Yiu, S. 2003. SmartTutor: An intelligent tutoring system in web-based adult education, Journal of Systems & Software; 68(1), 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y.; Yoo, S., 2001. Text database discovery on the web: Neural net based approach, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 16(1), 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, G.; Cate, Y. 2004. Predicting MBA no-shows and graduation success with discriminate analysis,International Advances in Economic Research, 10(3), 235.
   Google Scholar
• Delone, W.; McLean, E., 2003. The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: A ten year update. Journal of Management information Systems, 19(4), 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, M. 2002. Investigating the benefits of web-centric instruction for study learning: An exploratory study of a BA course. Journal of Education for Business, 77(4), 238.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J., Dutton, M. 2005. Characteristics and performance of students in an online section of business statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 13(3). http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v13n3/dutton.html
   Google Scholar
• Ghaoui, C.; Janvier, W. 2003. Interactive E-Learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 2(3), 26.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, J. 2002. Artificial neural networks: A new approach to predicting application behavior. Research in Higher Education, 43(2), 235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandzol, J. 2004. Teaching MBA Statistics Online: A Pedagogically Sound Process Approach. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 237.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. 2005. Auto Tutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, W. 1999. The instructional management system cooperative: Converting random acts of progress into global progress. Educom Review, 34(6), 32.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, T. 1999. The gender difference: Validity of standardized admission tests in predicting MBA performance. Journal of Education for Business, 75(2), 91.
   Google Scholar
• Hardgrave, B.; Wilson, R.; Kent, K. 1994. Predicting graduate student success: A comparison of neural networks and traditions techniques. Computers & Operations Research, 21, 249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J.; Wilt, J.; Nebel, K.; Ashford, S.; Sternberg, R. 2006. Assessing practical intelligence in business school admissions: A supplement to the graduate management admissions test. Learning & Individual Differences, 16(2), 101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefer, P.; Gould, J. 2000. Assessment of admission criteria for predicting student's academic performance in graduate business programs. Journal of Education for Business, 75(4), 225.
   Google Scholar
• Holsapple, C.; Lee-Post, A. 2006. Defining, assessing and promoting e-learning success; an information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H. 2002. Student perceptions in an online mediated environment, International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 408.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, A.; Arbaugh, J. 2006. Virtual and traditional feedback-seeking behaviors: Underlying competitive attitudes and consequent grade performance, Decision Sciences of Innovation Education, 4(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Johne, M. 2003. Virtual environments, CMA Management, 76 (10), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.G.; John, J.A. 2003. Use of Demonstration and Experiments in Teaching Business Statistics. Journal of Applied Mathematics & Decision Sciences, 7(2), 93.
   Google Scholar
• Kathawala, Y.; Abdou, K.; Elmuti, D. 2002. The global MBA: A comparative assessment for its future. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(1), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Kezim, B; Pariseau, S; Quinn, F. 2005. Is Grade Inflation Related to Faculty Status?Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 358.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman, L. 2007. Giving MBA programs the third degree. Journal of Management Education, 31(1), 81.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J.; Singhania, R. 2004. A study of teaching and testing strategies for a required statistics course for undergraduate business students. Journal of Education for Business, 79(6), 333.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, T.; Nantz, K., 2003. Student attitudes towards Internet courses: A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangan, K., 2003. The new MBA: Business school professors shift programs to emphasize relevance and flexibility. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 12.
   Google Scholar
• McAlevey, L. 2001. Evolution in Business Statistics Curricula: Learning from the Making Statistics more Effective in Schools of Business. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society, 50(3), 321.
   Google Scholar
• McDuffie, R.; Smith, S.; Murphy, L. 2006. Impact of an audit reporting expert system on learning performance: A teaching note. Accounting Education, 15(1), 189.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, C. 2004. A comparison of student persistence and performance in online and classroom business statistics experiences. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Mulekar, M. 2000. Internet Resources for AP Statistics Teacher. Journal of Statistics Education, 8(2). http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v8n2/mulekar.html
   Google Scholar
• Naik, B. 2004. Using neural networks to predict MBA student success. College Student Journal, 38(1), 143.
   Google Scholar
• Neo, T., Neo, M. 2004. Classroom innovation: Engaging students in interactive multimedia learning. Campus — Wide Information Systems, 21(3), 118.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N.; Cripps, A. 2001. Predicting housing value: A comparison of multiple regression analysis and artificial neural networks. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 22(3), 313.
   Google Scholar
• Post, G. 2005. An Expert System Helps Students Learn Database Design. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(2), 273.
   Google Scholar
• Raffle, H., Brooks, G. 2003. Using Monte Carlo software to teach abstract statistical concepts: A Case study. Teaching Psychology, 32(3), 193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards-Wilson, S. 2006. What every business school needs to know about its master of business administration. Journal of Education for Business., 82(2), 95.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, Y. 2003. A survey of distance education challenges and technologies. International Journal of Distance Learning Technologies, 1(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. 2006. Evaluating the predictive validity of graduate management admission test scores, Educational & Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y.T.; Liang, C.L. 2000. Using multivariate rank sum tests to evaluate effectiveness of computer applications in teaching business statistics. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(3), 337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suanpang, P.; Petocz, P.; Kalceff, W. 2005. Student attitudes to learning business statistics: Comparison of online and traditional methods. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R.; Hardgrave, B. 1995. Predicting graduate student success in an MBA program: Regression versus classification, Educational & Psychological Measurement, 55(2), 186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B.; Lu, D. 2001. Predicting academic performance in management education: A empirical investigation of MBA success. Journal of Education for Business, 77(1), 15.
   Google Scholar