Using Propositions for the Assessment of Structural Knowledge

References

• Broers, N.J. (2001). “Analyzing Propositions Underlying the Theory of Statistics”. Journal of Statistics Education, [Online]. 9 (3).(http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v9n3/broers.html)
   Google Scholar
• Broers, N.J. (2002a). “Selection and Use of Propositional Knowledge in Statistical Problem Solving”, Learning and Instruction, 12 (3), 323–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broers, N.J. (2002b). “Learning Statistics by Manipulating Propositions”. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Capetown, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Broers, N.J. and Imbos, Tj. (2005). “Charting and Manipulating Propositions as Methods to Promote Self-explanation in the Study of Statistics”. Learning and Instruction, 15 (6), 517–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broers, N.J., Mur, M.C. and Bude, L. (2005). “Directed Self-explanation in the Study of Statistics”. In: G. Burrill & M. Camden (eds.) Curricular development in statistics education. (pps. 21–35). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Broers, N.J. (2007). “Designing Open Questions for the Assessment of Conceptual Understanding”. Proceedings of the IASE Satellite Conference on Assessing Student Learning in Statistics. Guimaraes, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L.T. and Stanners, R.F. (1983). “The Assessment and Modification of Concept Interrelationships”. Journal of Experimental Education, 52, 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bude, L.M. (2007). On the Improvement of Students' Conceptual Understanding in Statistics Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Geesling, W.E. and Shavelson. R.J. (1975). “Comparison of Content Structure and Cognitive Structure in High School Students' Learning of Probability”. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. and Lefevre, P. (1986). “Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: an Introductory Analysis”. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: the Case of Mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Huberty, C.J., Dresden, J., and Byung-Gee, B. (1993). “Relations Among Dimensions of Statistical Knowledge”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 523–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D.H., Beissner, K. and Yacci, M. (1993). Structural Knowledge: Techniques for Representing, Conveying, and Acquiring Structural Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J.J. (2006). Factors in Statistics Learning: Developing aDispositional Attribution Model to Describe Differences in the Development of Statistical Proficiency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A.E., Finbarr, S. and Whittaker, A. (1997). “Simple Approaches to Assessing Underlying Understanding of Statistical Concepts”. In: I. Gal and J.B. Garfield (Eds.), The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1986). “Knowing, Doing, and Teaching Multiplication”. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 305–342.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F. (1992). “Training Strategies for Attaining Transfer of Problem-Solving Skill in Statistics: A Cognitive-Load Approach”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M.A. and Shavelson, R.J. (1996). “Problems and Issues in the Use of Concept Maps in Science Assessment”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (6), 569–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Shavelson, R.J., Li, M. and Schultz, S.E. (2001). “On the Validity of Cognitive Interpretations of Scores From Alternative Concept-Mapping Techniques”. Educational Assessment, 7 (2), 99–141.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, C. and Mattern, N. (1997a). “Assessing Students' Connected Understanding of Statistical Relationships”. In: I. Gal and J.B. Garfield (Eds.), The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, C. and Mattern, N. (1997b). “Use of Map Techniques in Teaching Applied Statistics Courses”. The American Statistician, 51 (2), 171–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar