1,574
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Multimedia Presentations in Educational Measurement and Statistics: Design Considerations and Instructional Approaches

&

References

  • Atkinson, R.K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 416–427.
  • Baylor, A.L. & Ryu, J. (2003). The effects of image and animation in enhancing pedagogical agent persona. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28 (4), 373–394.
  • Bulgren, J. A., Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J.B. & Lenz, B. K. (2000). The use and effectiveness of analogical instruction in diverse secondary content classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (3), 426–441.
  • Campbell, C. & Evans, J.A. (2001). Investigation of preservice teachers' classroom assessment practices during student teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 93 (6), 350–355.
  • Chance, B., Ben-Zvi, D., Garfield, J., & Medina, E. (2007). The role of technology in improving student learning of statistics, Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1 (1). http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclastat/cts/tise/vol1/iss1/art2
  • Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1992). The split attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233–246.
  • Clark, R.E. & Choi, S. (2005). Five design principles for experiments on the effects of animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (3), 209–225.
  • Craig, S.D., Ghobson, B., & Driscoll, D.M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 428–434.
  • Dunsworth, Q. & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent's image. Computers and Education. 49 (3), 677–690.
  • Freedman, D. Pisani, R., Purves, R., & Adhikari, A. (1991). Statistics (2nd ed). New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2005). A framework for teaching and assessing reasoning about variability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4 (1), 92–99.
  • Gulz, A. & Haake, M. (2006). Design of animated pedagogical agents- A look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (4), 322–339.
  • Impara, J.C., Divine, K.P., Bruce, F.A., Liverman, M.R., & Gay, A. (1991). Does interpretive test score information help teachers? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10 (4), 16–18.
  • Kim, Y. & Baylor, A.L. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54 (6), 569–596.
  • Lukin, L. E., Bandalos, D. L., Eckhout, T. J., & Mickelson, K. (2004). Facilitating the development of assessment literacy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23 (2), 26–32.
  • Lundeberg, M. A., Levin, B. B., & Harrington, H. L. (Eds.). (1999). Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lusk, M.M. & Atkinson, R.K. (2007). Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21 (6), 747–764.
  • Makar, K. & Confrey, J. (July, 2002). Comparing two distributions: Investigating secondary teachers' statistical thinking. Presented at the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Cape Town, South Africa. Available at http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/1/10_18_ma.pdf
  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer, R.E. & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14 (1), 87–99.
  • Moreno, R. & Flowerday, T. (2006). Students' choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31 (2), 186–207.
  • Moreno, R. & Mayer, R.E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (2), 358–368.
  • Moreno, R., Mayer, R., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177–213.
  • Pedulla, J., Abrams, L., Madaus, G., Russell, M., Ramos, M., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
  • Phillips, L. (2005). Formative evaluation report (No. 2): UCSB Gevirtz Graduate School of Education.
  • Popham, W.J. (2006). Needed: A dose of accountability. Educational Leadership, 63 (6), 84–85.
  • Simons, P. R. (1984). Instructing with analogies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76 (3), 513–527.
  • Stiggins, R. (1991). Relevant classroom training for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10 (1), 7–12.
  • Stiggins, R. (March 13, 2002). Assessment for learning. Education Week, vol. 21, no. 26, pp. 30, 32–33.
  • Stiggins, R. & Herrick, M. (2007). A status report on teacher preparation in classroom assessment. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Utts, J. M. & Heckard, R. F. (2004). Mind on Statistics (2nd Ed). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Wang, T-H, Wang, K-H & Huang, S-C. (2008). Designing a Web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers and Education, 51 (1), 448–462.
  • Yeagley, P. (2006). Project evaluation of year 2: Instructional tools in educational measurement and statistics (ITEMS) for school personnel. Unpublished report.
  • Yeagley, P. (2007). Project evaluation of year 3: Instructional tools in educational measurement and statistics (ITEMS) for school personnel. Unpublished report.
  • Zwick, R., Sklar, J., Wakefield, G., Hamilton, C., Norman, A., & Folsom, D. (2008). Instructional tools in educational measurement and statistics (ITEMS). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27 (2), 14–27. [Erratum for Zwick et al., Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 14–27 in Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(4)].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.