Play It Again: Teaching Statistics With Monte Carlo Simulation

References

• Arnau, J., Bendayan, R., Blanca, M. J., and Bono, R. (2013), “The Effects of Skewness and Kurtosis on the Robustness of Linear Mixed Models,” Behavioural Research, 45, 873–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnholt, A. T. (1999), “Simulating Sampling Distributions,” Teaching Statistics, 21, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Harden, J. J., Ray, S., and Zavisca, J. (2014), “BIC and Alternative Bayesian Information Criteria in the Selection of Structural Equation Models,” Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, J. W., White, B. J., and Craig, G. (2014), “R Tricks for Kids,” Teaching Statistics, 36, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P. (2015), “Extended Mixed-Effects Item Response Models With the MH-RM Algorithm,” Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 200–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2016), SimDesign: Structure for Organizing Monte Carlo Simulation Designs, R package version 1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P., Counsell, A., and Flora, D. B. (2016), “It Might Not Make a Big DIF: Improved Differential Test Functioning Statistics That Account for Sampling Variability,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 114–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P., and Flora, D. B. (2014), “Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Noncompensatory IRT Models With the MH-RM Algorithm,” Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 339–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P., Pek, J., and Liu, Y. (submitted), “Profile-Likelihood Confidence Intervals in Item Response Theory Models,” Multivariate Behavioral Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W., Cheng, J., Allaire, J., Xie, Y., and McPherson, J. (2016), shiny: Web Application Framework for R, R package version 0.13.2.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1990), “Things I Have Learned (so Far),” American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez, D. D., Barr, C. D., and Cetinkaya-Rundel, M. (2014), Introductory Statistics With Randomization and Simulation (1st ed.), OpenIntro Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Everton, T. (1984), “Probalistic Simulation in the Classroom,” Teaching Statistics, 6, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., and Weisberg, H. S. (2010), An R companion to Applied Regression (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1995), “How Students Learn Statistics,” International Statistical Review, 63, 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., and Ben-Zvi, D. (2007), “How Students Learn Statistics Revisited: A Current Review of Research on Teaching and Learning Statistics,” International Statistical Review, 75, 372–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and Nolan, D. (2002), Teaching Statistics: A Bag of Tricks (1st ed.), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R. N., and McKenzie, J. D. J. (2009), “Creating Realistic Data Sets With Specified Properties via Simulation,” Teaching Statistics, 31, 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F. J., and Wallnau, L. B. (2012), Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (9th ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, R., Jones, G. T., and Jones, K. (2007), “Pedagogical Simulation of Sampling Distributions and the Central Limit Theorem,” Teaching Statistics, 29, 94–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, R., Jones, G. T., and Jones, K. (2008), “Teaching Confidence Intervals Using Simulation,” Teaching Statistics, 30, 53–56.
   Google Scholar
• Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Freudenthaler, H. H., and Bühner, M. (2012), “Sensitivity of SEM Fit Indexes With Respect to Violations of Uncorrelated Errors,” Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, T., and Burke, M. (2000), “On Simulation and the Teaching of Statistics,” Teaching Statistics, 22, 91–96.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, O., Maillardet, R., and Robinson, A. (2009), Scientific Programming and Simulation Using R, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., and McCoach, D. B. (2015), “The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom,” Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. M. (2015), “Simulations of the Sampling Distribution of the Mean Do Not Necessarily Mislead and Can Facilitate Learning,” Journal of Statistics Education, 23, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Matloff, N. (2011), The Art of R Programming: A Tour of Statistical Software Design, San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J. D. (2002), “Using Computer Simulation Methods to Teach Statistics: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Statistics Education, 10, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z. (1997), Monte Carlo Simulations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Noland, R. B., Klein, N. J., and Tulach, N. K. (2013), “Do Lower Income Areas Have More Pedestrian Casualties?” Accident Analysis and Prevention, 59, 377–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, P., Curran, P., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., and Chen, F. (2001), “Monte Carlo Experiments: Design and Implementation,” Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 287–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2016), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raffle, H., and Brooks, G. P. (2005), “Using Monte Carlo Software to Teach Abstract Statistical Concepts: A Case Study,” Teaching of Psychology, 32, 193–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, P. H., and Ramsey, P. P. (2009), “Power and Type I Errors for Pairwise Comparisons of Means in the Unequal Variances Case,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 263–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. (2013), Simulation (5th ed.), San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sass, D. A., Schmitt, T. A., and Marsh, H. W. (2014), “Evaluating Model Fit With Ordered Categorical Data Within a Measurement Invariance Framework: A Comparison of Estimators,” Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayegh, M. A., Castrucci, B. C., Lewis, K., and Hobbs-Lopez, A. (2010), “Teen Pregnancy in Texas: 2005 to 2015,” Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14, 94–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., and Perugini, M. (2013), “At What Sample Size do Correlations Stabilize?” Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teetor, P. (2011), R cookbook, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., and MacKinnon, D. P. (2016), “Monte Carlo Confidence Intervals for Complex Functions of Indirect Effects,” Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 194–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, B. L. (1947), “The Generalization of ‘Student's’ Problem When Several Different Population Variances are Involved,” Biometrika, 34, 28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2009), ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2014), Advanced R, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. (2005), “The Role of Simulation Approaches in Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education, 13, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zickar, M. J. (2005), The Psychology Research Handbook: A Guide for Graduate Students and Research Assistants (2nd ed.), chapter Computational Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar