Investigating College Students' Reasoning With Messages of Risk and Causation

References

• American Statistical Association (2007), Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) Report: A Pre-K-12 Curriculum Framework. Available at http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/gaiseprek-12_full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2016), Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education: College Report 2016. Available at http://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GaiseCollege_Full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Angell, M., and Kassirer, J. P. (1994), “Clinical Research—What Should the Public Believe?” New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 189–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. (2016, April 5), “Red Wine is Actually Good for You Because it Could Prevent Heart Disease,” The Mirror. Available at http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/red-wine-actually-good-you-7691136
   Google Scholar
• Bieda, K., Sela, H., and Chazan, D. (2014), “‘You Are Learning Well My Dear’ Shifts in Novice Teachers' Talk about Teaching During Their Internship,” Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 150–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakwell, G. M. (2007), The Psychology of Risk, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1995), “Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science,” Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. C. (1999), A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C. (2004), “Science Reporting to the Public: Does the Message Get Twisted?” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170, 1415–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (2013), “Evolutionary Psychology: New Perspectives on Cognition and Motivation,” Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 201–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L. A., Jr., and Popken, D. A. (2008), “Overcoming Confirmation Bias in Causal Attribution: A Case Study of Antibiotic Resistance Risks,” Risk Analysis, 28, 1155–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., and Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007), “They Don't Show Nothing I Didn't Know: Emergent Tensions Between Culturally Relevant Pedagogy and Mathematics Pedagogy,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 139–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., and Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2007), “Making Numbers Matter: Present and Future Research in Risk Communication,” American Journal of Health Behavior, 31, S47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K., and Brown, C. A. (1998), “‘You're Going to Want to Find out Which and Prove it’: Collective Argumentation in a Mathematics Classroom,” Learning and Instruction, 8, 527–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrow, L., Taylor, W. C., and Arnold, R. M. (1992), “Absolutely Relative: How Research Results are Summarized Can Affect Treatment Decisions,” The American Journal of Medicine, 92(2), 121–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2005), Education for Critical Consciousness, New York; London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, I. (2002), “Adults' Statistical Literacy: Meanings, Components, Responsibilities,” International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale De Statistique, 70, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes-Hallett, D. (2003), “The Role of Mathematics Courses in the Development of Quantitative Literacy,” in Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges, ed. B. L. Madison, Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines. Available at http://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/QL/WhyNumeracyMatters.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. C. (2015, October 27), “Something is Going to Kill You. Life is About What Happens Before That,” The Guardian. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/27/bacon-carcinogen-kill-you-life-happens
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, F. (2003), “Categorisation, Causation, and the Limits of Understanding,” Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 663–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2012), “Running on Empty? How Folk Science Gets by With Less,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 329–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2012), “The Development of Causal Reasoning,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3, 327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddox, J. (1995), “The Prevalent Distrust of Science,” Nature, 378, 435–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, R., Bero, L., Ross-Degnan, D., Henry, D., Lee, K., Watkins, J., and Soumerai, S. B. (2000), “Coverage by the News Media of the Benefits and Risks of Medications,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1645–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000), Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010), Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. (2011), “Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education,” Educational Psychologist, 46, 84–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perneger, T. V., and Agoritsas, T. (2011), “Doctors and Patients' Susceptibility to Framing Bias: A Randomized Trial,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 1411–1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Hibbard, J., Slovic, P., and Dieckmann, N. (2007), “Numeracy Skill and the Communication, Comprehension, and Use of Risk-benefit Information,” Health Affairs, 26, 741–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1995), Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F. (2004), “How People Make Decisions That Involve Risk: A Dual-Processes Approach,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 60–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., and Brainerd, C. J. (1991), “Fuzzy-trace Theory and Children's Acquisition of Mathematical and Scientific Concepts,” Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 27–59.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., and Dieckmann, N. F. (2009), “How Numeracy Influences Risk Comprehension and Medical Decision Making,” Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzberg, S. (2013, July 23), “Those Fish Oil Supplements Might Cause Cancer,” Forbes. Available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2013/07/23/those-fish-oil-supplements-might-cause-cancer/#6556a6c1229c
   Google Scholar
• Simosi, M. (2003), “Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations,” Argumentation, 17, 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar