Dual Mode Delivery in an Introductory Statistics Course: Design and Evaluation

References

• Allen, I. E., and Seaman, J. (2008), Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States, 2008, Nedham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Basturk, R. (2005), “The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Teaching Introductory Statistics,” Educational Technology & Society, 8, 170–178.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, J. (1999), “Analysis of Concepts and Skills Acquisition Differences Between Web-delivered and Classroom-delivered Undergraduate Instructional Technology Courses,” North Carolina State University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., and Gustafson, P. (2018), “Conditional Equivalence testing: An Alternative Remedy for Publication Bias,” PloS One, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J., and Dutton, M. (2005), “Characteristics and Performance of Students in an Online Section of Business Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education, 13. Available at https://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10691898.2005.11910564#.XN4WdFIzbRZ
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. R., Wang, R., Yeh, T., Anderson, J., Haija, R., McBratney-Owen, P., Peeples, L., Sinha, S., Xanthakis, V., Rajicic, N., and Zhang, J. (2007), “Evaluation of Distance Learning in an Introduction to Biostatistics Class: A Case Study,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 6, 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Fullwood, C., and Doherty-Sneddon, G. (2006), “Effect of Gazing at the Camera During a Video Link on Recall,” Applied Ergonomics, 37, 167–175. DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, I., and Garfield, J. B. (1997), The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education (Vol. 12), Amsterdam: IOS Press and International Statistical Institute. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00377.x.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. B. (1994), “Beyond Testing and Grading: Using Assessment to Improve Student Learning,” Journal of Statistics Education, 2, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S., and Nicholas, J. (2009), “Using Examples to Promote Statistical Literacy,” in 2009 UniServe Science Proceedings, pp. 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, C. L. (2001), “Student Attitude and Achievement in an Online Graduate Statistics Course,” University of Cincinnati, ProQuest Digital Dissertations.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlburt, R. T. (2001), “Lectlets” Deliver Content at a Distance: Introductory Statistics as a Case Study,” Teaching of Psychology, 28, 15–20. DOI:10.1207/S15328023TOP2801_04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. R. (1999), “A Comparison of an all Web-based Class to a Traditional Class,” the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Y. J., and Yablon, Y. B. (2003), “Locus of Control, Self-esteem, Motivation and Satisfaction, Teaching and Learning through an Internet-based and Traditional “Introduction to Statistics” Course,” in Proceedings of European Distance Education Network, Rhodes: EDEN., 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, F., and Xie, K. (2009), “Toward Deep Learning for Adult Students in Online Courses,” Internet and Higher Education, 12, 136–145. DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2017), “Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for t tests, Correlations, and Meta-analyses,” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 355–362. DOI:10.1177/1948550617697177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, F., and Lemonde, M. (2012), “A Comparison of Online versus Face-to-face Teaching Delivery in Statistics Instruction for Undergraduate Health Science Students,” Advances in Health Science Education, 18, 963–973. DOI:10.1007/s10459-012-9435-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mara, C. A., and Cribbie, R. A. (2012), “Paired-Samples Tests of Equivalence,” Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 41, 1928–1943. DOI:10.1080/03610918.2011.626545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K. (2010), “Comparing Outcomes Between Online and Face-to-face Statistics Courses: A Systematic Review,” contributed refereed paper in C. Reading (Ed.), Data and Context in Statistics education: Towards an Evidence-based Society, in 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and Gallini, J. K. (1990), “When is an Illustration worth Ten Thousand Words?” Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., and Jones, P. (2009), “Virtual Spaces: Employing a Synchronous Online Classroom to Facilitate Student Engagement in Online Learning,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10. Available at https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGready, J. (2006), “Basic Biostats: Online Learning versus Onsite Learning,” paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, C. H. (2004), “A Comparison of Student Persistence and Performance in Online and Classroom Business Statistics Experiences,” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2, Spring 2004, 1–10. DOI:10.1111/j.0011-7315.2004.00015.x.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1997), “New Pedagogy and New Content: The Case of Statistics,” International Statistical Review, 65, 123–137. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-5823.1997.tb00390.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. (2007), “The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: What Can be Done?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, K., Higgins, K., Miller, S., Strawser, S., and Boone, R. (1998), “Delivering Instruction via Interactive Television and Videotape: Student Achievement and Satisfaction,” Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 59–77. DOI:10.1177/016264349801300401.
   Google Scholar
• Rumsey, D. J. (2002), “Statistical Literacy as a Goal for Introductory Statistics Courses,” Journal of Statistics Education, 10, 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte, J. G. (1998), “Virtual Teaching in Higher Education: The New Intellectual Superhighway or just Another Traffic Jam?” unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, California State University, Northridge.
   Google Scholar
• Scouller, K. (1998), “The Influence of Assessment Method on Students’ Learning Approaches: Multiple Choice Question Examination versus Assignment Essay,” Higher Education, 35, 453–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suanpang, P., and Petocz, P. (2006), “E-learning in Thailand: An Analysis and Case Study,” International Journal of E-Learning, 5, 415–438.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., and Whittaker, T. A. (2005), “A Comparison of Student Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online versus a Traditional Face-to-face Statistics Class,” Innovative Higher Education, 29, 233–250. DOI:10.1007/s10755-005-1938-x.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. R., and Bain, J. D. (1982), “Consistency in Learning Strategies,” Higher Education, 11, 249–259. DOI:10.1007/BF00155616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vioreanu, D. [cited August 14, (2018)], “Distance Learning Course Options Get More Popular Every Year,” Distance Learning Portal, available at https://www.distancelearningportal.com/articles/393/distance-learning-course-options-get-more-popular-every-year.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. Y., and Newlin, M. H. (2000), “Characteristics of Students who enroll and succeed in Psychology Web-based Classes,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 137–143. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellek, S. (2010), Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence and Noninferiority (2nd ed.), New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Yablon, Y. B., and Katz, Y. J. (2001), “Statistics through the Medium of the Internet: What Students Think and Achieve,” Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5, 17–22.
   Google Scholar