Teaching Style and Attitudes: A Comparison of Two Collegiate Introductory Statistics Classes

References

• American Statistical Association (2016), “Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education: College Report,” American Statistical Association, available at http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GaiseCollege_Full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Autin, M., Bateiha, S., and Marchionda, H. (2013), “Power Through Struggle in Introductory Statistics,” PRIMUS, 23, 935–948. DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2013.820810.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C., and Eison, J. (1991), “Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports,” ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., and Nygren, T. I. (2014), “Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence From a Six-Campus Randomized Trial,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 94–111. DOI: 10.1002/pam.21728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgan, M. (2006), “In Defense of Lecturing,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 38, 30–34. DOI: 10.3200/CHNG.38.6.30-34.
   Google Scholar
• Butt, A. (2014), “Student Views on the Use of a Flipped Classroom Approach: Evidence From Australia,” Business Education & Accreditation, 6, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K., and Winquist, J. (2011), “Evaluating an Active Learning Approach to Teaching Introductory Statistics: A Classroom Workbook Approach,” Journal of Statistics Education, 19. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2011.11889596.
   Google Scholar
• Carnell, L. J. (2008), “The Effect of a Student-Designed Data Collection Project on Attitudes Toward Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education, 16, 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2008.11889551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiesi, F., and Primi, C. (2009), “Assessing Statistics Attitudes Among College Students: Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics (SATS),” Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 309–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesi, F., and Primi, C. (2010), “Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Factors Related to Students’ Statistics Achievement,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 9, 6–26.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, A., and Marek, P. (2009), “A Palatable Introduction to and Demonstration of Statistical Main Effects and Interactions,” Teaching of Psychology, 36, 130–133. DOI: 10.1080/00986280902739784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVaney, T. A. (2010), “Anxiety and Attitude of Graduate Students in On-Campus vs. Online Statistics Courses,” Journal of Statistics Education, 18, 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2010.11889472.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., and Schraw, G. (2003), “Self-Efficacy Beliefs in College Statistics Courses,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 161–186. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00015-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., Hogg, B., Schau, C., and Whittinghill, D. (2002), “First Courses in Statistical Science: The Status of Educational Reform Efforts,” Journal of Statistics Education, 10, 456–467. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2002.11910665.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., Adams, L., Gu, L., Hart, C., and Nichols-Whitehead, P. (2012), “Students’ Attitudes Toward Statistics Across the Disciplines: A Mixed-Methods Approach,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 11, 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Gundlach, E., Richards, K. A. R., Nelson, D., and Levesque-Bristol, C. (2015), “A Comparison of Student Attitudes, Statistical Reasoning, Performance, and Perceptions for Web-Augmented Traditional, Fully Online, and Flipped Sections of a Statistical Literacy Class,” Journal of Statistics Education, 23, 1–33. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2015.11889723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, M., and Wolfe, D. A. (1973), Nonparametric Statistical Methods, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaian, S. A., and Kasim, R. M. (2014), “A Meta-Analytic Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of Small-Group Learning Methods on Statistics Achievement,” Journal of Statistics Education, 22, 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2014.11889691.
   Google Scholar
• Knypstra, S. (2009), “Teaching Statistics in an Activity Encouraging Format,” Journal of Statistics Education, 17. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2009.11889518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeCompte, M., and Schensul, J. (1999), Designing & Conducting Ethnographic Research, Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacki, A. S. (2011), “Using the 4MAT Framework to Design a Problem-Based Learning Biostatistics Course,” Journal of Statistics Education, 19, 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2011.11889622.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, D. K., Garfield, J. B., delMas, R., Groth, R. E., Kaplan, J. J., McGowan, H., and Lee, H. S. (2012), “Connecting Research to Practice in a Culture of Assessment for Introductory College-Level Statistics,” Recuperado de, available at www.causeweb.org/research/guidelines/ResearchReport_Dec_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. J. (2016), “The Flipped Classroom Improves Student Achievement and Course Satisfaction in a Statistics Course A Quasi-Experimental Study,” Teaching of Psychology, 43, 10–15. DOI: 10.1177/0098628315620063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaff, T. P., and Weinberg, A. (2009), “Do Hands-On Activities Increase Student Understanding? A Case Study,” Journal of Statistics Education, 17. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2009.11889536.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Posner, M. A. (2011), “The Impact of a Proficiency-Based Assessment and Reassessment of Learning Outcomes System on Student Achievement and Attitudes,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 10, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2012), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, available at http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, C., Schau, C., and Emmioğlu, E. (2012), “The Importance of Attitudes in Statistics Education,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 11, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, C. (1992), “Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics (SATS-28),” available at http://evaluationandstatistics.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, C. (2003), “Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics (SATS-36),” available at http://evaluationandstatistics.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, C., and Emmioğlu, E. (2012), “Do Introductory Statistics Courses in the United States Improve Students’ Attitudes?,” Statistics Education Research Journal, 11, 86–94.
   Google Scholar
• Sizemore, O. J., and Lewandowski, G. W. (2009), “Learning Might Not Equal Liking: Research Methods Course Changes Knowledge But Not Attitudes,” Teaching of Psychology, 36, 90–95. DOI: 10.1080/00986280902739727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhoof, S., Kuppens, S., Castro Sotos, A. E., Verschaffel, L., and Onghena, P. (2011), “Measuring Statistics Attitudes: Structure of the Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics (SATS-36),” Statistics Education Research Journal, 10, 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Walthausen, A. (2013), “Don’t Give Up on the Lecture,” The Atlantic, available at http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2013/11/dont-give-up-on-the-lecture/281624/.
   Google Scholar
• Weltman, D., and Whiteside, M. (2010), “Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Active Learning Methods in Business Statistics: Convergence to the Mean,” Journal of Statistics Education, 18. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2010.11889480.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2013), “The Flipped Class: A Method to Address the Challenges of an Undergraduate Statistics Course,” Teaching of Psychology, 40, 193–199. DOI: 10.1177/0098628313487461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winquist, J., and Carlson, K. (2014), “Flipped Statistics Class Results: Better Performance Than Lecture Over One Year Later,” Journal of Statistics Education, 22. 11889717. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S. (1985), “The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Attitudes Toward Statistics,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 401–405. DOI: 10.1177/001316448504500226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar