Marketing Communication Receivers’ Perceptions of Source-Self Similarity: Some New Findings

References

• Bakan, D. (1966), The Duality of Human Existence, Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1981), “Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing,” Psychological Review, 88 (4), 354–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berscheid, E. (1966), “Opinion Change and Communicator-Communicatee Similarity and Dissimilarity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 670–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. H. (1973), “Conceptions of Sex Role: Some Cross-Cultural and Longitudinal Perspectives,” American Psychologist, 28, 512–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, T. C. (1965), “Communicator-Recipient Similarity and Decision Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 650–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., R. K. Young, and W. Griffitt (1966), “The Reinforcement Properties of Attitude Statements,” Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 266–267.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, B., L. Phillips, and A. Tybout (1981), “Designing Research for Application,” Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, R. (1971), “Sex Differences in Ego Functioning: Exploratory Studies of Agency and Communion,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37, 267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, R. (1972), “Understanding Women: Implications for Personality Theory and Research,” Journal of Social Issues, 28, 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, L. A., K. R. Evans, and D. Cowles (1990), “Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (3), 68–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., W. Wood, and S. Chaiken (1978), “Causal Inferences About Communicators and Their Effects on Opinion Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 424–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1984), “Masculinity, Femininity, Psychological Androgyny, and the Structure of Values,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (3), 604–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feick, L. and R. A. Higie (1992), “The Effects of Preference Heterogeneity and Source Characteristics on Ad Processing and Judgments About Endorsers,” Journal of Advertising, 21 (2), 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiebert, M. S. (1983), “Measuring Traditional and Liberated Males” Attitudes,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56 (1), 83–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. and S. E. Taylor (1984), Social Cognition, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Frable, D. E. and S. L. Bern (1985), “If You’re Gender Schematic, All Members of the Opposite Sex Look Alike,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. W., M. Doering, and T. O’Brien (1977), “Masculinity and Femininity Factors in Product Perception and Self Image,” in Advances in Consumer Research, 5, H. Keith Hunt, ed., Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 326–332.
   Google Scholar
• Karlins, M. and H. I. Abelson (1970), Persuasion, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (1961), “Processes of Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 25 (Spring), 57–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L. and C. F. Halverson (1983), “The Effects of Sex-Typing Schemas on Young Children’s Memory,” Child Development, 26 (1), 129–139.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J. (1988), “The Influence of Sex Roles on Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Research 14 (4), 522–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J. (1989), “Gender Differences in Information Processing: A Selectivity Interpretation,” Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising, Cafferata, P. and A. Tybout eds., Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 219–260.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (1984), “Self Schemas, Gender, and Social Comparison: A Clarification of the Related Attributes Hypothesis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (6), 1222–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. J. (1983), “Sex-typing and Self Schemata Effects on Memory and Response Latency,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlofsky, J. L. (1981), “Relationship Between Sex Role Attitudes and Personality Traits and the Sex Role Behavior Scale-1: A New Measure of Masculine and Feminine Role Behaviors and Interests,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 927–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. and R. F. Bales (1955), Family Socialization and Interaction Process, New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Qualls, W. J. (1987), “Household Decision Behavior: The Impact of Husbands’ and Wives’ Sex Role Orientation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (2), 264–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, B. H., Leclerc, F., and L. Dube-Rioux (1988), “Sex-Typing and Consumer Behavior: A Test of Gender Schema Theory,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (1), 122–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T. and R. L. Helmreich (1979), “The Many Faces of Androgyny: A Reply to Locksley and Colten,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E. and H. Falcone (1982), “Cognitive Bases of Stereotyping: The Relationship Between Categorization and Prejudice,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 426–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittier, T. (1991), “The Effects of Actors’ Race in Commercial Advertising: Review and Extension,” Journal of Advertising, 20 (1), 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar