The “Trade Dress” Controversy: A Case of Strategic Cross-Brand Cannibalization

References

• Aaker, D. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• AmBrit, Inc. V. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir. 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Ruth (1995). “Drugstore profits soar with private-label brands,” Drug Topics, vol 139, #20, p 60.
   Google Scholar
• Baur, Bob (1996). “Private label’s public stance,” Supermarket News, vol 46, #13, p33.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, L. (1996). “Retailers with a future,” Marketing Management, vol 5, #1, pp 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasin, A., R. Dickinson & S. Nandan (1995). “Retailer brands: A channel perspective: The United States,” Journal of Marketing Channels, vol 4, #4, 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, Neil (1946). “The significance of the battle of the brands,” AMA’s Two Big Days: Spring Conference, Proceedings/ Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, W., E. Lee & R. Staelin (1994). “Mastering the mix: Do advertising, promotion, and sales force activities lead to differentiation,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol 31, pp 214–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk, Susan M. & Joseph W. Alba (1994). “The importance of the brand in brand extension,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol XXXI, pp 214–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookman, Faye (1995). “Drug chains bank on private label beauty to pump up profits,” WWD, vol 169, #92, p 1.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, A.O. (1946). “The future for national brands” AMA’s Two Big Days: Spring Conference, Proceedings. Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp 123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Kim B. & Takahire Fujimoto (1990). “The power of product integrity,” Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp 107–109.
   Google Scholar
• “Close-up: A new look at branding,” (1996). Progressive Grocer, vol 75, #4, p38.
   Google Scholar
• Conopeo, Inc. V. May Department Stores Co., 46 F.3d 1556, cert, denied, 115 S.Ct. 1724 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, Peter A. & Daniel C. Smith (1994). “The effect of brand portfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of brand extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol XXXI, pp 229–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetrakakes, Pan (1993). “Private-Label Copycats Rankle Big Brands,” Packaging, vol 38, June 1993, pp 37–38.
   Google Scholar
• DeNitto, Emily (1995). “Back into focus,” Brandweek, vol 36, #22, pp 22.
   Google Scholar
• Dinwoodie, Graeme (1997). “Reconceptualizing the inherent distinctiveness of product design trade dress,” North Carolina Law Review, vol 75, January, 471–539.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, Sharon (1996). “Stores developing the big brands,” WWD, vol 171, #11, p 18.
   Google Scholar
• Emert, Carol (1995). “PLMA hears how to avoid lawsuits,” Supermarket News, vol 45, #42 p 54.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §1125(c)1-4 (1995) (effective Jan. 16, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Finch, Andrew (1996). “When imitation is the sincerest form of flattery: Private label products and the role of intention in determining trade dress infringement,” University of Chicago Law Review, vol 63, Summer, 1243–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, Ramona G. (1995). “Distinguishing characteristics!, sub-branding in HBC is allowing retailers to give their store-label products a uniform look,” Supermarket News, vol 45, #46, p 59.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, Lisa (1995). “Trade dress suits knock knockofls off store shelf,” The National Law Journal, September, pp B1–B3.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Arthur (1995). “Brands go private,” WWD, vol 169, #79, p 6.
   Google Scholar
• Glemet, Francois & Rafael Mira (1995). “The dilemma of the brand leaders,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol 23, #6, p 9.
   Google Scholar
• “Greater concentration, more own brands,” (1995). International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, V 23, #6, p 16.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M. & R. Kerin (1979) “Diagnosis and management of the product cannibalism syndrome,” Michigan Business Review, November, pp 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, Stephen J. & Shumeer Baneiji (1993). “When do private labels succeed?” Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• H.R. Rep. No. 104-374, United States Code Congressional and Administrative News, Legislative History of Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995, at 1029-35 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Andrew (1995). “A name for itself” U.S. Distribution Journal, vol 222, #3, p 14.
   Google Scholar
• Kerin, Roger A., Michael G. Harvey & James T. Rothe (1978) “Cannibalism and new product development,” Business Horizons, October, pp 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, Philip Marketing Management, 8th Edition, Prentice-Hall, p 457.
   Google Scholar
• Landler, M. Z. Schiller & L. Therrien (1991). “What’s in a name? Less and less,” Business Week, July, pp 66–67.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Robin (1995). “A brand is a brand is a brand,” WWD, vol 170, #82, p S30.
   Google Scholar
• Liebeck, Laura (1994). “Consumers want national brands but will buy private labels,” Discount Store News Power Brands, October, pp 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Low, George S. & Ronald A. Fullerton (1994). “Brands, brand management, and the brand manager system: A critical-historical evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol XXXI, May, pp 173–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammarella, James (1995). “Brand growth at all-time low,” Discount Store News, vol 34, #20, p 43.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Charlotte & H. Milne (1994). “An approach for identifying cannibalization within product line extensions and multi-brand strategies,” Journal of Business Research, vol 31, pp 163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, Ryan (1995a). “Branding the store,” Progressive Grocer, vol 74, #11, p79.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, Ryan (1995b). “What do consumers really want?” Progressive Grocer, vol 34, #11, pp 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, Ryan (1995c). “Your store is the brand,” Progressive Grocer, vol 74, #11, p 27.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, Ryan (1995d). “How important are store brands?” Progressive Grocer, vol 74, #11, p79.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, Norma (1996). “Price competition between national and store brands: who hurts whom?” Stores vol 78, # 1, p RR6.
   Google Scholar
• Messinger, Paul R. & Chakravarthi Narasimhan (1995). “Has power shifted in the grocery channel?” Marketing Science, vol 14, #2, p 189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Cyndee (1995). “Big brands fight back against private labels,” Marketing News, vol 29, #2, p 1.
   Google Scholar
• Moorthy, K. Sridhar & I.P.L. Png (1992). “Marketing segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions,” Management Science, vol 38, #3, pp 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgensen, Gretchen (1991). “The trend is not their friend,” Forbes, September, p 114.
   Google Scholar
• Morgensen, Gretchen (1996). “Denial in battlecreek,” Forbes, October 7,44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, B. (1996). “The brands the thing,” Forbes, March 4, pp 72–86.
   Google Scholar
• Nichol, Dave (1996). “P&G admits Cott’s right on brand tax,” Progressive Grocer, July, pp 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Parlin, Neil (1946). “The manufacturer, the retailer and branded merchandise,” Printers’ Ink, July 6, pp 84–99.
   Google Scholar
• Perrigo Company Study (1995). “Earning your share of private label profits,” The Perrigo Company.
   Google Scholar
• PL’s squeeze on the big brands; store brands step into the limelight, (1995). WWD, vol 169, #36,pS6.
   Google Scholar
• Quelch, John, Paul Farris & James Oliver (1987). “The product management audit,” Harvard Business Review, vol 65, March-April, pp 30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quelch, John A., & David Harding (1996). “Brands versus private labels: Fighting to win,” Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Paul S., Alan S. Dick & Arun K. Jain (1995). “How consumers evaluate private label brand quality,” Stores, vol 77, #1, p RR1.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Samuel D. & Lisa M. Gigliotti (1995). “Conopco-Kaputco for trade dress plaintiffs?” V. 85 The Trademark Reporter 135–53.
   Google Scholar
• Rosendahl, Iris & Faye Brookman (1994). “Too close for comfort,” Advertising Age, vol 65, pp 18.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, Z. (1993). “Brands on the run,” Business Week, April, pp 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Schloss, Daniel (1996). “Marks of distinction: Rethinking secondary meaning standards in trademark law after Qualitex v. Jacobson,” Cardoza Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, vol 14, 695–730.
   Google Scholar
• Shocker, Allan D., Rajendra K. Srivastava & Robert W. Ruekert (1994). “Challenges and opportunities feeing brand management An introduction to the special issue,” Journal of Marketing Research, May, pp 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, K. & A. Miller (1990). “Sequels for the shelf,” Newsweek, July 9, pp 42–43.
   Google Scholar
• SquirtCo v. Seven-Up Co., 628 F2d 1086 (8th Cir. 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, R. & A. Shocker (1991). “Brand equity: A perspective on its meaning and measurement,” Report #91-124, Cambridge, MA: Marketing Service Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stobert, P. (1994). Brand Power, New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, Diane (1996). “Brands at bay,” The Financial Times, #32927, p 16.
   Google Scholar
• “The customer knows best,” (1996). CFO, May, p 19.
   Google Scholar
• “The quality message,” (1996). Supermarket Business, vol 51, #1, p 53.
   Google Scholar
• Tosh, Mark (1995). “Battling the brands,” WWD, vol 170, #55, p26.
   Google Scholar
• Trademark Act of 1946, The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1127 (1988 ed & Supp. V) (as amended).
   Google Scholar
• Woo, Jundia (1994). “Vaseline ruling deals setback to big brands,” The Wall Street Journal, September.
   Google Scholar
• Woodsmith Publishing Co. v. Meredith Corp., 904 F2d 1244 (8th Cir. 1990).
   Google Scholar