What You Ask Changes What I Pay: Framing Effects in Pay What You Want Pricing

REFERENCES

• Betsch, Tilmann, Susanne Haberstroh, Andreas Glöckner, Thomas Haar and Klaus Fiedler (2001), “The Effects of Routine Strength on Adaptation and Information Search in Recurrent Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84 (1), 23–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Yong, Jose Fernandez, and Babu Nahata (2015), “Pay-What-You-Want Pricing: Can It Be Profitable?” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 176–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWall, C. Nathan, Roy F. Baumeister and Kathleen D. Vohs (2008), “Satiated With Belongingness? Effects of Acceptance, Rejection, and Task Framing on Self-Regulatory Performance,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (6), 1367–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N. (2011), “What’s It All About? Framing in Political Science,” in Perspectives on Framing, Gideon Keren, ed. New York: Psychology Press, 279–302.
   Google Scholar
• Eibach, Richard P. and Valerie Purdie-Vaughns (2011), “How to Keep On Keeping On: Framing Civil Rights Accomplishments to Bolster Support for Egalitarian Policies,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47 (1), 274–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Alayli, Amani, Ernest S. Park, Lawrence A. Messé and Norbert L. Kerr (2002), “Having to Take a Stand: The Interactive Effects of Task Framing and Source Status on Attitudes,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5 (3), 233–48.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993), “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm,” Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Ronald S., Jens Förster and Markus Denzler (2007), “Interactive Effects of Mood and Task Framing on Creative Generation,” Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 141–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier, Pieter A. and Bas Van Der Klauuw (2012), “Selection in a Field Experiment with Voluntary Participation,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27 (1), 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Gneezy, Ayelet, Uri Gneezy, Gerhard Riener and Leif D. Nelson (2012), “Pay-What-You-Want, Identity, and Self-Signaling in Markets,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (19), 7236–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, Jonathan S. and Susan E. Cross (2011), “Task Framing and Perceived Fit: The Role of Personality, Task Label, and Partner Involvement,” Motivation & Emotion, 35 (4), 368–82.
   Google Scholar
• Guagnano, Gregory A., Thomas Dietz and Paul C. Stern (1994), “Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: A Test of the Contribution Model,” Psychological Science, 5 (6), 411–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haws, Kelly L. and William O. Bearden (2006), “Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4),304-311.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F. and Kristopher J. Preacher (2014), “Statistical Mediation Analysis with a Multicategorical Independent Variable,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67 (3), 451–70.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Chip, Richard P. Larrick, and George Wu (1999), “Goals as Reference Points,” Cognitive Psychology, 38 (1), 79–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Chung L. (1993), “Simultaneous-Equation Model for Estimating Consumer Risk Perceptions, Attitudes, and Willingness-to-Pay for Residue-Free Produce,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 27 (2), 377–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugenberg, Kurt, Galen V. Bodenhaused, and Melissa McLain (2006), “Framing Discrimination: Effects of Inclusion Versus Exclusion Mind-Sets on Stereotypic Judgments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (6), 1020–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, R. Mark, John P. Lightle, and Douglas A. Norton (2015), “The Pay-What-You-Want Business Model: Warm Glow Revenues and Endogenous Price Discrimination,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 215–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, Hyunkyu and Wujin Chu (2012), “Are Consumers Acting Fairly Toward Companies? An Examination of Pay-What-You-Want Pricing,” Journal of Macromarketing, 32 (4), 348–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Jennifer Wiggins and Annie Peng Cui (2013), “To Influence or Not to Influence: External Reference Price Strategies in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing,” Journal of Business Research, 66 (2), 275–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Minah H., Leif D. Nelson, Ayelet Gneezy, and Uri Gneezy (2014), “Paying More When Paying for Others,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107 (3), 414–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica, 47 (2), 263–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keren, Gideon (2011), “On the Definition and Possible Underpinnings of Framing Effects: A Brief Review and a Critical Evaluation,” in Perspectives on Framing, Gideon Keren, ed. New York: Psychology Press, 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Ju-Young, Martin Natter, and Martin Spann (2009), “Pay What You Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (1), 44–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Ju-Young, Katharina Kaufmann and Manuel Stegemann (2014), “The Impact of Buyer-Seller Relationships and Reference Prices on the Effectiveness of the Pay What You Want Pricing Mechanism,” Marketing Letters, 25 (4), 409–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Jungkeun, Jae-Eun Kim and Roger Marshall (2014), “Search for the Underlying Mechanism of Framing Effects in Multi-Alternative Multi-Attribute Decision Situations,” Journal of Business Research, 67 (3), 378–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy, Patrick Carter and Edward Blair (2001), “Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85 (2), 382–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy and Anish Nagpal (2008), “The Impact of Goal Framing on the Choose-Reject Discrepancy,” Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 784–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, Marcus (2015), “Exploring the Pay-What-You-Want Payment Motivation,” Journal of Business Research, 68 (11), 2347–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, Francisco J., José A. Noguera, and Jordi Tena-Sánchez (2012), “How Much Would You Like to Pay? Trust, Reciprocity and Prosocial Motivations in El trato,” Social Science Information, 51 (3), 389–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, Irwin P., Sandra L. Schneider and Gary J. Gaeth (1998), “All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (2), 149–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, Vincent, Rami Zwick, Akshay R. Rao, and Jake A. Pattaratanakun (2015), “‘Pay What You Want’ As Threshold Public Good Provision,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127, 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, Joan and Durairaj Maheswaran (2004), “Exploring Message Framing Outcomes When Systematic, Heuristic, or Both Types of Processing Occur,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1–2), 159–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, Sukant K., Chung L. Huang and Stephen L. Ott (1991), “Consumer Willingness to Pay for Pesticide-Free Fresh Produce,” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16 (2), 218–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natter, Martin and Katharina Kaufmann (2015), “Voluntary Market Payments: Underlying Motives, Success Drivers and Success Potentials,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 149–57.
   Google Scholar
• Parvinen, Petri, Essi Pöyry, and Maurits Kaptein (2013), “Pay-What-You-Want Pricing: The Impact of Framing” in Proceedings of the AMA Winter Educators Conference, 24, 110–18.
   Google Scholar
• Primary Stages (2013), “Pay What You Can Performances,” ( available at http://primarystages.org/paywhatyoucan).
   Google Scholar
• Punj, Girish (2015), “The Relationship Between Consumer Characteristics and Willingness to Pay for General Online Content: Implications for Content Providers Considering Subscription-Based Models,” Marketing Letters, 26 (2), 175–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racherla, Pradeep, Mark Keith, and Jeffrey Babb (2011), “Pay-What-You-Want Pricing for Mobile Phone Applications: The Effects of Social Information and Privacy Assurances,” in Proceedings of the AMA Summer Educators Conference, San Francisco, CA, 336.
   Google Scholar
• Registry Theatre (2013), “Dance at the Registry,” ( available at http://www.registrytheatre.com/category/events/registryevents/danceattheregistry/), .
   Google Scholar
• Regner, Tobias (2015), “Why Consumers Pay Voluntarily: Evidence from Online Music,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 205–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riener, Gerhard and Christian Traxler (2012), “Norms, Moods and Free Lunch: Longitudinal Evidence on Payments from a Pay-What-You-Want Restaurant,” Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(4),476–83.
   Google Scholar
• Roney, Christopher J. R. and Darrin R. Lehman (2008), “Self-Regulation in Goal Striving: Individual Differences and Situational Moderators of the Goal-Framing/Performance Link,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38 (11), 2691–09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Steven (1996), “Ability to Pay for Health Care: Concepts and Evidence,” Health Policy Plan, 11 (3), 219–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter, Achim and Björn Vollan (2015), “Flowers and an Honour Box: Evidence on Framing Effects,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 186–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Aaron M. and Richard P. DeShon (2007), “What to Do? The Effects of Discrepancies, Incentives, and Time on Dynamic Goal Prioritization,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 4), 928–41.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Klaus M., Martin Spann, and Robert Zeithammer (2015), “Pay What You Want as a Marketing Strategy in Monopolistic and Competitive Markets,” Management Science, 61 (6), 1217–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schons, Laura Marie, Mario Rese, Jan Wieseke, Wiebke Rasmussen, Daniel Weber and Wolf-Christian Strotmann (2014), “There Is Nothing Permanent Except Change – Analyzing Individual Price Dynamics in ‘Pay-What-You-Want’ Situations,” Marketing Letters, 25, (1) 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, Marina, Annemarie Lüer and Abdolkarim Sadrieh (2015), “Pay-What-You-Want or Mark-Off-Your-Own-Price—A Framing Effect in Customer-Selected Pricing,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 200–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafir, Eldar (1993), “Choosing vs. Rejecting: Why Some Options Are Both Better and Worse Than Others,” Memory & Cognition, 21 (4), 546–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, Rajiv K. and Naomi Mandel (2008), “Preventing Digital Music Piracy: The Carrot or the Stick?” Journal of Marketing, 72(1),1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spann, Martin and Gerard J. Tellis (2006), “Does the Internet Promote Better Consumer Decisions? The Case of Name-Your-Own-Price Auctions,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (1), 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudón M., José F. (2015), “Pay-What-You-Want Because I Do Not Know How Much to Charge You,” Economics Letters, 137, 41–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ülkümen, Gülden and Amar Cheema (2011), “Framing Goals to Influence Personal Savings: The Role of Specificity and Construal Level,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6),958–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Joke Simons, Willy Lens, Kennon M. Sheldon, and Edward L. Deci (2004), “Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (2), 246–60.
   Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Willy Lens and Edward L. Deci (2006), “Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation,” Educational Psychologist, 41(1),19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Tinneke Timmermans, Willy Lens, Bart Soenens, and Anja Van den Broeck (2008), “Does Extrinsic Goal Framing Enhance Extrinsic Goal-Oriented Individuals’ Learning and Performance? An Experimental Test of the Match Perspective Versus Self-Determination Theory,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2),387–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisstein, Fei L., Monika Kukar-Kinney and Kent B. Monroe (2016), “Determinants of Consumers’ Response to Pay-What-You-Want Pricing Strategy on the Internet,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (10), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieseke, Jan, Mario Rese, Wiebke Rasmussen, Laura Marie Schons, Wolf-Christian Strotmann, and Daniel Weber (2012), “There Is Nothing Permanent Except Change: Analyzing Individual Price Dynamics in ‘Pay-What-You-Want’ Situations,” in Proceedings of the AMA Winter Educators Conference, 264–265.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Ying, Ayelet Fishbach, and Ravi Dhar (2006), “When Thinking Beats Doing: The Role of Optimistic Expectations on Goal-Based Choice,” Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 57–58.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Xinshu, John G. Lynch, Jr. and Qimei Chen (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths About Mediation Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar