Depoliticising literature, politicising diversity: ethno-racial boundaries in Dutch literary professionals’ aesthetic repertoires

References

• Ahmed, S. 2012. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amatmoekrim, K. 2015. “Een monoculturele uitwas.” De Groene Amsterdammer, August 19. https://www.groene.nl/artikel/een-monoculturele-uitwas
   Google Scholar
• Berkers, P. 2009. “Classification into the Literary Mainstream? Ethnic Boundaries in the Literary Fields of the United States, the Netherlands and Germany 1955 – 2000.” Doctoral Dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Bouazza, H. 2001. Een Beer in Bontjas. Amsterdam: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique on the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2008. “A Conservative Revolution in Publishing.” Translation Studies 1 (2): 123–153. doi:10.1080/14781700802113465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breure, M., and L. Brouwer. 2004. “Een reconstructie van het debat rond migrantenliteratuur in Nederland.” In Kunsten in beweging 1980 – 2000. Cultuur en migratie in Nederland, edited by R. L. Buikema, and M. J. H. Meijer, 381–396. Den Haag: Sdu.
   Google Scholar
• Brouilette, S. 2016. “Impersonality and Institutional Critique.” In The Contemporaneity of Modernism. Literature, Media, Culture, edited by M. D’Arcy, and M. Nilges, 80–90. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• D’Arcy, M., and M. Nilges. 2016. “Introduction: The Contemporaneity of Modernism.” In The Contemporaneity of Modernism. Literature, Media, Culture, edited by M. D’Arcy, and M. Nilges, 1–16. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Glas, F. 1998. “Authors’ Oeuvres as the Backbone of Publishers’ Lists: Studying the Literary Publishing House after Bourdieu.” Poetics 25 (6): 379–397. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(98)90009-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deinema, M. 2011. “The Culture Business Caught in Place: Spatial Trajectories of Dutch Cultural Industries, 1899–2005.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Delhaye, C. 2008. “Immigrants’ Artistic Practices in Amsterdam, 1970–2007: A Political Issue of Inclusion and Exclusion.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (8): 1301–1321. doi:10.1080/13691830802364874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhaye, C., and V. van de Ven. 2014. “‘A Commitment to Cultural Pluralism’. Diversity Practices in Two Amsterdam Venues: Paradiso and De Meervaart.” Identities 21 (1): 75–91. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2013.828621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., and P. Fernández-Kelly. 2015. “Immigration and the Arts: A Theoretical Inquiry.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (8): 1236–1244. doi:10.1080/01419870.2015.1016081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, B., and J. A. Wallace. 1994. Women Artists and Writers. Modernist (Im)Positionings. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, E. 2002. “Introduction: Cultural Diversity and the Problem of Aesthetics.” In Aesthetics in a Multicultural Age, edited by E. Elliot, L. Freitas Caton, and J. Rhyne. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franssen, T. 2015. “How Books Travel: Translation Flows and Practices of Dutch Acquiring Editors and New York Literary Scouts, 1980–2009.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Franssen, T., and G. Kuipers. 2013. “Coping with Uncertainty, Abundance and Strife: Decision-Making Processes of Dutch Acquisition Editors in the Global Market for Translations.” Poetics 41 (1): 48–74. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2012.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franssen, T., and D. Stoffelsen 2015. “De Witte Motor.” De Groene Amsterdammer, August 19. https://www.groene.nl/artikel/de-witte-motor
   Google Scholar
• Groenendijk, C. A. 2007. “Allochtonen of burgers. Definitiemacht in debat en wetgeving over migranten.” In Macht en verantwoordelijkheid. Essays voor Kees Schuyt, edited by J. W. Duyvendak, G. Engbersen, G. Teeuwen, and I. Verhoeven, 101–112. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoving, I. 2010. “The Postcolonial Turn in Dutch Literary Criticism.” Journal of Dutch Literature Studies 1 (1): 114–122.
   Google Scholar
• Huyssen, A. 1986. “Mass Culture as Women: Modernism’s Other.” In After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism, edited by A. Huyssen, 44–64. Houndmills: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huyssen, A. 2006. “Introduction: Modernism after Postmodernity.” New German Critique 99 (4): 1–5. doi:10.1215/0094033X-2006-008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, D. 2012a. Modernist Futures: Innovation and Inheritance in the Contemporary Novel. New Yok: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. 2012b. The Legacies of Modernism: Historicising Postwar and Contemporary Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuitert, L. 1999. “Niet zielig, maar leuk: Nederlandse uitgevers van multiculturele literatuur.” Literatuur 16 (6): 355–364.
   Google Scholar
• Laan, N. 2010. “De uitgever als poortwachter?” Nederlandse letterkunde 15 (2): 146–191. doi:10.5117/NEDLET2010.2.DE_U316.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 1992. Money, Morals and Manners. The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., and V. Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, D., and R. L. Walkowitz. 2008. “The New Modernist Studies.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 123 (3): 737–748. doi:10.1632/pmla.2008.123.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiniello, M., and J. M. Lafleur. 2008. “Ethnic Minorities’ Cultural and Artistic Practices as Forms of Political Expression: A Review of the Literature and a Theoretical Discussion on Music.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (8): 1191–1215. doi:10.1080/13691830802364809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnaard, L. 2008. New Germans, New Dutch: Literary Interventions. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minnaard, L. 2017. “Oscillating between Margin and Centre: Dutch Literature of Migration.” In Emergence and Recognition of Immigrant and Ethnic Minority Writers since 1945: Thirteen National Contexts in Europe and Beyond, edited by W. Sievers, and S. Vlasta. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. 1988. Unspeakable Things Unspoken: The Afro-American Presence in American Literature. Tanner Lectures on Human Values (October 7). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, F., and R. Frissen. 2014. “De diversiteitsparadox: Over de veranderende relatie tussen journalistiek en etnisch-culturele diversiteit.” Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap 42 (3): 265–285.
   Google Scholar
• Nijborg, M., and F. Laroui. 2013. “The Emergence of a Dutch-Moroccan Literature: An Institutional and Linguistic Explanation.” In Literature, Language, and Multiculturalism in Scandinavia and the Low Countries, edited by W. Behschnitt, S. De Mul, and L. Minnaard, 225–242. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• NRC Handelsblad. 2000. “Kritiek op Keuze voor Rushdie.” April 21. http://retro.nrc.nl/W2/Tegenspraak/Boekenweekgeschenk/000421.html
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, G. 1988. Vision and Difference: Femininity, Feminism and Histories of Art. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saraber, L. 2001. “Kiezen of delen: de toepasbaarheid van inhoudelijke subsidiecriteria op niet-westerse dans en fusievormen.” In De Kunst van het Kiezen, edited by H. Beerekamp, and P. Verbist, 55–89. Amsterdam: Boekmanstichting.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2013. “The Imagination of ‘Society’ in Measurements of Immigrant Integration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (7): 1–20. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.783709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievers, W. 2008. “Writing Politics: The Emergence of Immigrant Writing in West Germany and Austria.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (8): 1217–1235. doi:10.1080/13691830802364817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomek, H. 2015. “Une litérature moyenne. La littérature allemande contemporaine entre production restreinte en grande production.” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 30 (1): 100–107. doi:10.3917/arss.206.0100.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. 2010. “Dynamics of Power in Dutch Integration Politics.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Vaessens, T. 2009. De Revanche van de Roman. Literatuur, autoriteit, engagement. Nijmegen: Vantilt.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Deijl, L., S. Pieterse, M. Prinse, and R. Smeets. 2016. “Mapping the Demographic Landscape of Characters in Recent Dutch Prose: A Quantitative Approach to Literary Representation.” Journal of Dutch Literature 7 (1): 20–42.
   Google Scholar
• Velthuis, O. 2013. “Globalization of Markets for Contemporary Art: Why Local Ties Remain Dominant in Amsterdam and Berlin.” European Societies 15 (2): 290–308. doi:10.1080/14616696.2013.767929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkowitz, R. L. 2006. Cosmopolitan Style. Modernism beyond the Nation. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, D. 2000. “Culture or Commerce? Symbolic Boundaries in French and American Book Publishing.” In Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology. Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, edited by M. Lamont, and L. Thevenot, 127–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. 2006. “Groundless Beauty: Feminism and the Aesthetics of Uncertainty.” Feminist Theory 7 (2): 143–158. doi:10.1177/1464700106064407.
   Google Scholar