4,482
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

‘My passport is just my way out of here’. Mixed-immigration status families, immigration enforcement and the citizenship implications

ORCID Icon
Pages 18-36 | Received 03 Nov 2017, Accepted 21 May 2019, Published online: 18 Jul 2019

References

  • Anderson, B. 2013. Us and Them? the Dangerous Politics of Immigration Controls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Anthias, F., and N. Yuval-Davis. 1989. “Introduction.” In Woman-Nation-State, edited by N. Yuval-Davis and F. Anthias, 1–15. London: Macmillan.
  • Baldwin, M. P. 2001. “Subject to Empire: Married Women and the British Natinality and Status of Aliens Act.” Journal of British Studies 40: 522–556.
  • Bonjour, S., and B. De Hart. 2013. “A Proper Wife, A Proper Marriage. Constructions of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Dutch Family Migration Policy.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 20 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1177/1350506812456459.
  • Bonjour, S., and J. Duyvendak. (2018) The “migrant with poor prospects”: racialized intersections of class and culture in Dutch civic integration debates. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41 (5): 882-900.
  • Bowling, B. 2013. “Epilogue: The Borders of Punishment: Towards a Criminology of Mobility.” In The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion, edited by K. F. Aas and M. Bosworth, 291–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brace, L. 2004. The Politics of Property: Labour, Freedom and Belonging. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Carver, N. 2016. “‘For Her Protection and Benefit’: The Regulation of Marriage-Related Migration to the UK.” Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (15): 2758–2776. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1171369.
  • Charsley, K., and M. Benson. 2012. “Marriages of Convenience, and Inconvenient Marriages: Regulating Spousal Migration to Britain.” Journal of Immigration and Asylm Law 26 (1): 10–26.
  • De Genova, N., and N. Peutz, eds.. 2010. The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space and the Freedom of Movement. New York, NY: Duke University Press.
  • De Hart, B. 2006. “Introduction: The Marriage of Convenience in European Immigration Law.” European Journal of Migration and Law 8 (3/4): 251–262. doi:10.1163/157181606778882591.
  • Gibney, M. 2011. “Should Citizenship Be Conditional?” RSC Working Paper 75. Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre.
  • Griffiths, M. 2014. “Out of Time: The Temporal Uncertainties of Refused Asylum Seekers and Immigration Detainees.” Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies 40 (12): 1991–2009. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2014.907737.
  • Griffiths, M. 2015. “‘Here, Man Is Nothing!’ Gender and Policy in an Asylum Context.” Men and Masculinities 18 (4): 468–488. doi:10.1177/1097184X15575111.
  • Griffiths, M. 2017a. “Foreign, Criminal: A Doubly Damned Modern British Folk-Devil.” Citizenship Studies 21 (5): 527–546. doi:10.1080/13621025.2017.1328486.
  • Griffiths, M. 2017b. “The Changing Politics of Time in the UK’s Immigration System.” In Timespace and International Migration, edited by E. Mavroudi, A. Christou, and B. Page, 48-60. Camberley: Edward Elgar.
  • Hansen, R. 2000. Citizenship and Immigration in Post-War Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Isin, E., ed.. 1999. Rights to the City: Citizenship, Democracy and Cities in a Global Age. London: Routledge.
  • Klug, F. 1989. “Oh to Be in England: The British Case Study.” In Woman-Nation-State, edited by N. Yuval-Davis and F. Anthias, 16–35. London: Macmillan.
  • Mountz, A. 2011. “Where Asylum-Seekers Wait: Feminist Counter-Topographies of Sites between States.” Gender, Place & Culture 18 (3): 381–399. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2011.566370.
  • Paul, K. 1997. Whitewashing Britain: Race and Citizenship in the Postwar Era, Ithaca. NY and London: Cornell University Press.
  • Scheibelhofer, P. 2012. “From Health Check to Muslim Test: The Shifting Politics of Governing Migrant Masculinity.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 33 (3): 319–332. doi:10.1080/07256868.2012.673474.
  • Shafir, G., ed.. 1998. The Citizenship Debates, A Reader. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
  • Sirreyeh, A. 2015. “All You Need Is Love and £18,600: Class and the New UK Family Migration Rules.” Critical Social Policy 35 (2): 228–247. doi:10.1177/0261018314563039.
  • Smith, E. 2014. Race, Gender and the Body in British Immigration Control. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Stevenson, N., ed.. 2001. Culture & Citizenship. London: Sage.
  • The Migration Observatory. 2014. Love and Money: How Immigration Policy Discriminates between Families. Oxford: University of Oxford. Accessed 13 August 2017. http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/commentaries/love-and-money-how-immigration-policy-discriminates-between-families/
  • Tyler, I. 2010. “Designed to Fail: A Biopolitics of British Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 14 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/13621020903466357.
  • Tyler, I. 2013. Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
  • Walters, W. 2002. “Deportation, Expulsion, and the International Police of Aliens.” Citizenship Studies 6 (3): 265–292. doi:10.1080/1362102022000011612.
  • Wray, H. 2006. “An Ideal Husband? Marriages of Convenience, Moral Gate-Keeping and Immigration to the UK.” European Journal of Migration and Law 8 (3–4): 303–320. doi:10.1163/157181606778882582.
  • Wray, H. 2012. Regulating Marriage Migration into the UK: A Stranger in the Home. London: Ashgate.
  • Yuval-Davis, N. 2011. The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Yuval-Davis, N., and P. Werbner, eds.. 1999. Women, Citizenship and Difference. London: Zed Books.