Family rights-claiming as act of citizenship: an intersectional perspective on the performance of intimate citizenship

References

• Apitzsch, U., L. Inowlocki, and M. Kontos. 2008. “The Method of Biographical Policies Evaluation.” In Self-employment Activities of Women and Minorities. Their Success or Failure in Relation to Social Citizenship Policies, edited by U. Apitzsch and M. Kontos, 12–18. Heildelberg: Vs Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S., and B. de Hart. 2013. “A Proper Wife, A Proper Marriage: Constructions of “Us” and “Them” in Dutch Family Migration Policy.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 20 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1177/1350506812456459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosniak, L. 2006. The Citizen and the Alien. Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charsley, K., and H. Wray (eds.). 2015. “The Invisible (Migrant) Man.” Special Issue of Men and Masculinities 18 (4). doi:10.1177/1097184X15575109.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• D’Aoust, A.-M. 2013. “In the Name of Love: Marriage Migration. Governementality and Technologies of Love.” International Political Sociology 7 (3): 258–274. doi:10.1111/ips.12022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hart, B. 2015. “Regulating Mixed Marriages through Acquisition and Loss of Citizenship.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 662 (1): 170–187. doi:10.1177/0002716215595390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebø, H. 2013. “With a Heavy Heart’: Ethics, Emotions and Rationality in Norwegian Immigration Administration.” Sociology 47 (2): 301–317. doi:10.1177/0038038512437895.
   Google Scholar
• Ferran, N. 2009. “La politique d’immigration contre les couples mixtes.” In Douce France. Rafles, Rétentions Et Expulsions, edited by O. Le Cour Grandmaison, 151–172. Paris: Seuil/RESF.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guerry, L. 2016. “Married Women’s Nationality in the International Context (1918–1935).” Clio. Women, Gender, History 43 (1): 73–93. https://www.cairn.info/revue-clio-women-gender-history-2016-1-page-73.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F. 2008. “Theorizing Acts of Citizenship.” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen, 15–43. London: Zed Books .
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F. 2013. “Claiming European Citizenship.” In Enacting European Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and M. Saward, 19–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F. 2017. “Performative Citizenship.” In Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, edited by A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad, and M. Vink, 500–523. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 2007. “Transformation of Citizenship: Status, Rights, Identity.” Citizenship Studies 11 (1): 37–48. doi:10.1080/13621020601099831.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N., ed. 2005. Inclusive Citizenship. London & New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lavanchy, A. 2013. “L’amour à l’état civil. Des régulations institutionnelles de l’intimité à la fabrique de la ressemblance nationale en Suisse.” Migrations Sociétés 25 (150): 61–94. doi:10.3917/migra.150.0061.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. 2002. “Sexual Citizenship.” In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, edited by E. F. Isin and B. Turner, 191–207. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, G.-M. 2018. “Keeping It in ‘The Family’: How Gender Norms Shape U.S. Marriage Migration Politics.” Gender & Society 32 (4): 460–492. doi:10.1177/0891243218777201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 2012. “Governing through the Family: Struggles over US Noncitizen Family Detention Policy.” Environment and Planning A 44: 866–888. doi:10.1068/a4477a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascia, C., and L. Odasso. 2015. “Le contrôle du mariage binational en Belgique: Acteurs et rationalités en jeu.” Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie 85: 41–68. http://journals.openedition.org/ris/282.
   Google Scholar
• Maskens, M. 2018. “Screening for Romance and Compatibility in Brussels’s Civil Registrar Office: Practical Norms of Bureaucratic Feminism.” In Intimate Mobilities: Sexual Eeconomies, Marriage and Migration in a Disparate World, edited by C. Groes and N. T. Fernandez, 74–99. Oxford-New-York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even. Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odasso, L. 2016a. Mixités conjugales. Discrédits, résistances et créativités dans les familles avec un partenaire arabe. Rennes: Presses Universitaires des Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Odasso, L. 2016b. “Moroccan Immigration to Europe: Old Legacies and New Ties.” In Decolonized the Mediterranean. European Colonial Heritages in North Africa and the Middle East, edited by G. Proglio, 70–93. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Odasso, L. 2018. “Le genre de l’engagement pour la défense du droit à la vie familiale en France.” Sextant 35 (1): 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Odasso, L. 2019. “Des ‘mariages noirs’. Les violences conjugales et le contrôle de la migration familiale en Belgique.” Recherches Familiales 19 (1): 87–101. doi:10.3917/rf.016.0087.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K. 2003. Intimate Citizenship. Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayad, A. 1999. “Immigration et ‘pensée d’État’.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociale 129: 5–14. doi:10.3406/arss.1999.3299.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S., and M. Gutekunst. 2019. “Studying Marriage Migration to Europe from Below.” Gender, Place and Culture A Journal of Feminist Geography 26 (6): 847–867. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2018.1489375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slama, S. 2015. “Le long Dimanche de fiançailles des couples mixtes.” Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie 85: 107–132. http://journals.openedition.org/ris/288.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 1986. The Contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. 2008. “Citizenship, Reproduction and the State: International Marriage and Human Rights.” Citizenship Studies 12 (1): 45–54. doi:10.1080/13621020701794166.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1989. “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship.” Ethics 99 (2): 250–274. doi:10.1086/293065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval Davis, N. 1997. Gender & Nation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval Davis, N. 2006. “Belonging and the Policies of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice 40 (3): 197–214. doi:10.1080/00313220600769331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zivi, K. 2012. Making Rights Claims. A Practice of Democratic Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar