‘Everything went according to the rules’. Female citizen sponsors’ legal consciousness, intimate citizenship and family migration law

References

• Abrego, L. J. 2011. “Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos: Fear and Stigma as Barriers to Claims Making for First and 1.5 Generation Immigrants.” Law & Society Review 45 (2): 337–370. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00435.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2013. Us and Them? the Dangerous Politics of Immigration Controls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J., L. Sudulich, and W. Van der Burg. 2015. “The Politicisation of Immigration in the Netherlands.” In The Politicisation of Migration, edited by W. van der Burg, G. D’Amato, and D. Ruedin, 97–118. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, J., and S. Shutter. 1994. Women’s Movement: Women under Immigration, Nationality and Refugee Law. Staffordshire: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Block, L. (2020). 'I'm Not Entitled to be Married in Germany? Am I German or Am I Not?' Narratives and Discursive Strategies of Citizen Sponsors in the German Spousal Migration Context. Forthcoming in Identities.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S. 2009. Grens En Gezin: Beleidsvorming Inzake Gezinsmigratie in Nederland, 1955–2005. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S., and B. De Hart. 2013. “A Proper Wife, A Proper Marriage. Constructions of “Us” and “Them” in Dutch Family Migration Policy.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 20 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1177/1350506812456459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S., and B. De Hart. 2020. “Intimate Citizenship: Citizenship, Membership and Belonging in Mixed-status Families.” Forthcoming in Identities.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S., and L. Block. 2016. “Ethnicizing Citizenship, Questioning Membership. Explaining the Decreasing Family Migration Rights of Citizens in Europe.” Citizenship Studies 20 (6–7): 779–794. doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1191429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and S. Zouridis. 2002. “From Street‐level to System‐level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology Is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control.” Public Administration Review 62 (2): 174–184. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, S. 2005. “Hierarchical Citizenship in a World of Unequal Nation-States.” PS Online 38 (4): 689–692.
   Google Scholar
• D’Aoust, A. M. 2013. “In the Name of Love: Marriage Migration, Governmentality, and Technologies of Love.” International Political Sociology 7 (3): 258–274. doi:10.1111/ips.12022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hart, B. 2003. Onbezonnen vrouwen, gemengde relaties in het nationaliteitsrecht en het vreemdelingenrecht. Amsterdam: Akstant.
   Google Scholar
• De Hart, B., and. 2013. “.“Law in the Everyday Lives of Transnational Families: An Introduction.” Onati Socio-Legal Series3 (6): 991-1003.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, D. M., and F. W. Munger. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ewick, P., and S. S. Silbey. 1995. “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative.” Law and Society Review 29 (2): 197–226. doi:10.2307/3054010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewick, P., and S. S. Silbey. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, A. 2019. Pensioners on the move. A socio-legal study on retirement migration from the Netherlands to Spain and Turkey. PhD Radboud University Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, D. 2010. “I’m Gonna Call My Lawyer:” Shifting Legal Consciousness at the Intersection of Inequality.” Interdisciplinary Legal Studies 51: 95–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, K. E. 2003. “The Cultural Power of Law and the Cultural Enactment of Legality: The Case of Same‐Sex Marriage.” Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 629–657. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00210.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2008. “Discrimination in the Name of Integration. Migrant’s Rights under the Integration Abroad Act.” http://pantheon.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/2008/netherlands0508/netherlands0508web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kubal, A. 2013. “Conceptualizing Semi‐Legality in Migration Research.” Law & Society Review 47 (3): 555–587. doi:10.1111/lasr.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. 2007. “Inclusive Citizenship: Realizing the Potential.” Citizenship Studies 11 (1): 49–61. doi:10.1080/13621020601099856.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. M., and S. Barclay. 2003. “In Their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World.” Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 617–628. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00209.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menjívar, C., and S. M. Lakhani. 2016. “Transformative Effects of Immigration Law: Immigrants’ Personal and Social Metamorphoses through Regularization.” American Journal of Sociology 121 (6): 1818–1855. doi:10.1086/685103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. B. 2000. “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment.” Law and Society Review 34 (4): 1055–1090. doi:10.2307/3115131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odasso, L. 2020. Family Rights-Claiming as Act of Citizenship: An Intersectional Perspective on the Performance of Intimate Citizenship Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. Identities. Global Studies in Culture and Power, Taylor & Francis (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Rytter, M. 2012. “Semi‐legal Family Life: Pakistani Couples in the Borderlands of Denmark and Sweden.” Global Networks 12 (1): 91–108. doi:10.1111/glob.2011.12.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenken, H. 2013. “‘The EU Should Talk to Germany’ Transnational Legal Consciousness as a Rights Claiming Tool among Undocumented Migrants.” International Migration 51 (6): 132–145. doi:10.1111/imig.12118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Significant. 2015. Monitor Basisexamen Inburgering Buitenland. https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/blg-885828.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Staver, A. 2013. “Free Movement and the Fragmentation of Family Reunification Rights.” European Journal of Migration and Law 15 (1): 69–89. doi:10.1163/15718166-12342024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, E., A. Kraler, S. Bonjour, and V. Bilger. 2009. “Doing Family. Responses to State Constructions of ‘The Migrant Family’ across Europe.” The History of the Family 14 (2): 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.hisfam.2009.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WODC. 2009. Internationale Gezinsvorming Begrensd? Een Evaluatie Van De Verhoging Van De Inkomens- En Leeftijdseis Bij Migratie Van Buitenlandse Partners Naar Nederland. Den Haag: WODC.
   Google Scholar