5,933
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INTRODUCTION

Intimate citizenship: introduction to the special issue on citizenship, membership and belonging in mixed-status families

&
Pages 1-17 | Received 01 Nov 2017, Accepted 27 Feb 2020, Published online: 12 Mar 2020

ReferencesReferences

  • Abrego, L. 2019. “Relational Legal Consciousness of U.S. Citizenship: Privilege, Responsibility, Guilt, and Love in Latino Mixed‐Status Families.” Law & Society Review 53 (3): 641–670. doi:10.1111/lasr.v53.3.
  • Bech, E. C., K. Borevi, and P. Mouritsen. 2017. “A ‘Civic Turn’ in Scandinavian Family Migration Policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden.” Comparative Migration Studies 5 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1186/s40878-016-0046-7.
  • Bhabha, J. 2003. “The Citizenship Deficit: On Being a Citizen Child.” Development 46 (3): 53–59. doi:10.1177/10116370030463008.
  • Block, L. 2020. “I’m Not Entitled to Be Married in Germany? Am I German or Am I Not?’ Narratives and Discursive Strategies of Citizen Sponsors in the German Spousal Migration Context.”Identities. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2020.1723327
  • Bonizzoni, P., and A. Fresnoza-Flot 2017. “Membership Intermediaries: A Case Study of Pluri-generational Binational Families in Italy and in France”. Conference paper international conference: Power, intimacy and the state: mixed families in Europe and beyond, June 2017 The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam, 12–13.
  • Bonjour, S. 2017. “Family Reunification and Migrant Integration Policies in The Eu: Dynamics Of Inclusion and Exclusion.” In Routledge Handbook Of Justice and Home Affairs Research, edited by, 215–226. London: Routledge.
  • Bonjour, S., and B. de Hart. 2013. “A Proper Wife, A Proper Marriage. Constructions of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Dutch Family Migration Policy.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 20 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1177/1350506812456459.
  • Bonjour, S., and L. Block. 2016. “Ethnicizing Citizenship, Questioning Membership. Explaining the Decreasing Family Migration Rights of Citizens in Europe.” Citizenship Studies 20 (6): 779–794. doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1191429.
  • Bosniak, L. 2006. The Citizen and the Alien. Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Bredbenner, C. L. 1998. A Nationality of Her Own. Women, Marriage and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Carens, J. H. 2003. “Who Should Get In? The Ethics of Immigration Admissions.” Ethics and International Affairs 17 (1): 95–110. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2003.tb00421.x.
  • Charsley, K., and H. Wray. 2015. “Introduction: The Invisible (Migrant) Man.” Men and Masculinities 8 (4): 403–423. doi:10.1177/1097184X15575109.
  • Chauvin, S., M. Salcedo Robledo, T. Koren, and J. Illidge. 2019. “Class, Mobility and Inequality in the Lives of Same-sex Couples with Mixed Legal Statuses.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1–17. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625137.
  • Clarke, J., K. Coll, E. Dagnino, and C. Neveu. 2014. Disputing Citizenship. Bristol/Chicago: Policy Press.
  • Constable, N. 2003. Romance on a Global Stage: Pen Pals, Virtual Ethnography, and Mail Order Marriages. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Cook, M. L. 2018. “Portugal’s Immigration and Integration Policies: A Case Apart?” Journal of International Migration and Integration 19 (3): 771–789. doi:10.1007/s12134-018-0569-x.
  • Coon, D. R. 2012. “Sun, Sand, and Citizenship: The Marketing of Gay Tourism.” Journal of Homosexuality 59 (4): 511–534. doi:10.1080/00918369.2012.648883.
  • Cott, N. F. 1998. “Marriage and Women’s Citizenship in the United States 1830–1934.” The American Historical Review 103 (5): 1440–1474. doi:10.2307/2649963.
  • Crenshaw, K. W. 1990. “A Black Feminist Critique of Anti-discrimination Law and Politics.” In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, edited by D. Kairys, 195–218. New York: Pantheon.
  • D’Aoust, A. 2018. “Family Migration and Membership.” In The Routledge Handbook of Politics in Europe, edited by A. Weinar, S. Bonjour, and L. Zhyznomirska, 179–189. London: Routledge.
  • De Graeve, K. 2010. “The Limits of Intimate Citizenship: Reproduction of Difference in Flemish‐Ethiopian ‘Adoption Cultures’.” Bioethics 24 (7): 365–372. doi:10.1111/biot.2010.24.issue-7.
  • De Hart, B. 2003. Onbezonnen Vrouwen. Gemengde Relaties in Het Nationaliteitsrecht En Het Vreemdelingenrecht. Amsterdam: Aksant.
  • De Hart, B. 2006. “The Morality of Maria Toet: Gender, Citizenship and the Construction of the Nation-state.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32 (1): 49–68. doi:10.1080/13691830500335267.
  • De Hart, B., and E. Besselsen. 2020. “Everything Went according to the Rules’. Female Citizen Sponsors’ Legal Consciousness, Intimate Citizenship and Family Migration Law.” Identities 1–19. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2020.1723310.
  • Del Real, D. 2019. “Toxic Ties: The Reproduction of Legal Violence within Mixed-status Intimate Partners, Relatives, and Friends.” International Migration Review 53 (2): 548–570. doi:10.1177/0197918318769313.
  • Fix, M., and W. Zimmermann. 2001. “All under One Roof: Mixed‐Status Families in an Era of Reform.” International Migration Review 35 (2): 397–419. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2001.tb00023.x.
  • Griffiths, M. 2019. “My Passport Is Just My Way Out of Here’. Mixed-immigration Status Families, Immigration Enforcement and the Citizenship Implications.” Identities 1–19. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2019.1625568.
  • Isin, E. 2012. Citizenship without Frontiers. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Isin, E. 2017. “Performative Citizenship.” In The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, edited by A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad, and M. Vink, 500–523. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Joppke, C. 2007. “Transformation of Citizenship: Status, Rights, Identity.” Citizenship Studies 11 (1): 37–48. doi:10.1080/13621020601099831.
  • Kanstroom, D., and B. M. Lykes, eds. 2015. The New Deportations Delirium: Interdisciplinary Responses. New York: New York University Press.
  • Kilkey, M. 2017. “Conditioning Family-life at the Intersection of Migration and Welfare: The Implications for ‘Brexit Families’.” Journal of Social Policy 46 (4): 797–814. doi:10.1017/S004727941700037X.
  • Knop, K. 2001. “Relational Nationality: On Gender and Nationality in International Law.” In Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices, edited by A. T. Aleinikoff and D. Klusmeyer, 89–126. Washington: Carnegie Endowment.
  • Kofman, E. 2004. “Family-related Migration: A Critical Review of European Studies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30 (2): 243–262. doi:10.1080/1369183042000200687.
  • Kofman, E., M. Rogoz, and F. Lévy. 2010. “Family Migration Policies in France.” NODE Policy Report, Vienna: BMWF/ICMPD.
  • Kraler, A., E. Kofman, M. Kohli, and C. Schmoll, eds. 2011. Gender, Generations and the Family in International Migration. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Kulu-Glasgow, I., A. Leerkes, H. Muermans, and L. Liu. 2009. Internationale Gezinsvorming Begrensd? Een Evaluatie Van De Verhoging Van De Inkomenseis En Leeftijdseis Bij Migratie Van Buitenlandse Partners Naar Nederland. Den Haag: WODC.
  • Kymlicka, W. 1998. “Citizenship”. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-S088-1.
  • Lanzieri, G. 2012. Merging Populations. A Look at Marriages with Foreign-born Persons in European Countries. Eurostat Statistics in Focus, 29/2012, Luxembourg: Eurostat.
  • Lister, R. 2007. “Inclusive Citizenship: Realizing the Potential.” Citizenship Studies 11 (1): 49–61. doi:10.1080/13621020601099856.
  • Liversage, A. 2013. “Gendered Struggles over Residency Rights When Turkish Immigrant Marriages Break Up.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3 (6): 1070–1090.
  • López, J. L. 2015. “Impossible Families”: Mixed‐Citizenship Status Couples and the Law.” Law & Policy 37 (1–2): 93–118. doi:10.1111/lapo.2015.37.issue-1-2.
  • Marshall, T. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mustasaari, S. 2017. “Ruling on Belonging: Transnational Marriages in Nordic Immigration Laws.” Migration Letters 14 (1): 25–37. doi:10.33182/ml.v14i1.313.
  • Odasso, L. 2020. “Family Rights-Claiming as Act of Citizenship: An Intersectional Perspective on the Performance of Intimate Citizenship.” Identities 1–19. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2020.1723309.
  • Okin, S. M. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.
  • Parisi, R. 2015. “Practices and Rhetoric of Migrants’ Social Exclusion in Italy: Intermarriage, Work and Citizenship as Devices for the Production of Social Inequalities.” Identities 22 (6): 739–756. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2014.950967.
  • Pateman, C. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Plummer, K. 2001. “The Square of Intimate Citizenship: Some Preliminary Proposals.” Citizenship Studies 5 (3): 237–253. doi:10.1080/13621020120085225.
  • Romero, M. 2015. “Foreword.” In Living Together, Living Apart: Mixed Status Families and US Immigration Policy, edited by A. Schueths and J. Lawston, xi–xvi. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Roseneil, S., I. Crowhurst, T. Hellesund, A. C. Santos, and M. Stoilova. 2012. “Remaking Intimate Citizenship in Multicultural Europe: Experiences outside the Conventional Family.” In Remaking Citizenship in Multicultural Europe, edited by B. Halsaa, S. Roseneil, and S. Sümer, 41–69. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Roseneil, S., I. Crowhurst, A. C. Santos, and M. Stoilova. 2013. “Introduction: Reproduction and Citizenship/reproducing Citizens.” Citizenship Studies 17 (8): 901–911. doi:10.1080/13621025.2013.851067.
  • Schrover, M. 2020. “Parenting, Citizenship and Belonging in Dutch Adoption Debates 1900–1995”. Identities. Forthcoming in.
  • Schueths, A. M. 2012. “Where are My Rights: Compromised Citizenship in Mixed-Status Marriage: A Research Note.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 39: 97–109.
  • Staver, A. 2013. “Free Movement and the Fragmentation of Family Reunification Rights.” European Journal of Migration and Law 15 (1): 69–89. doi:10.1163/15718166-12342024.
  • Stoler, A. L. 2001. “Tense and Tender Ties: The Politics of Comparison in North American History and (Post) Colonial StudieS.” The Journal of American History 88 (3): 829–865.
  • Strasser, E., A. Kraler, S. Bonjour, and V. Bilger. 2009. “Doing Family. Responses to State Constructions of ‘The Migrant Family’ across Europe.” The History of the Family 14 (2): 165–176
  • Van den Broucke, S., L. Vanduynslager, and P. De Cuyper. 2016. The EU Family Reunification Directive Revisited. An analysis of admission policies for family reunification of Third Country Nationals in EU Member States.
  • Vogel, U. 1994. “Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship.” In The Condition of Citizenship, edited by B. van Steenbergen, 76–89. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.
  • Walsum, S. K. 2008. The Family and The Nation: Dutch Family Migration Policies in the Context of Changing Family Norms. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambdridge Scholars Publishers.
  • Wray, H. 2011. Regulating Marriage Migration into the UK. A Stranger in the Home. Farnhem: Ashgate.
  • Wray, H. E., S. Grant, E. Kofman, and C. Peel. 2015. Family Friendly? The Impact on Children of the Family Migration Rules: A Review of the Financial Requirements. Commissioned by the Children’s Commissioner for England from Middlesex University and the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants. Accessed online on 6 March 2020 at http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/17659/
  • Yuval-Davis, N. [1997] 2008. Gender & Nation. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Zivi, K. 2012. Making Rights Claims. A Practice of Democratic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.