Boundary work: investigating the expert role of Danish migration researchers

References

• Andersson, M. 2018. Kampen om vitenskapeligheten: Forskningskommunikasjon i et politisk betent felt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, F. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, the Social Organization of Culture Difference. Bergen-Oslo: Universitets Forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Bech, H., and M. Ü. Necef. 2013. Er danskerne racister? Indvandrerforskningens problemer. Copenhagen: Hovedland.
   Google Scholar
• Bonde Broberg, M.2013. “Til kamp mod forskernes gode viljer.” Jyllands-Posten, January 8.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2008. “The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (4): 471–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760801996634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., and J. Newman. 2017. “People in This Country Have Had Enough of Experts’: Brexit and the Paradoxes of Populism.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (1): 101–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1282376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danbolt, M., and L. Myong. 2018. “Racial Turns and Returns: Recalibrations of Racial Exceptionalism in Danish Public Debates on Racism.” In Racialization, Racism, and Anti-Racism in the Nordic Countries, edited by P. Hervik, 3961. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dørge, H., and I. K. Pedersen. 2006. “Man forsker jo heller ikke i Tøndersagen.” Weekendavisen, November 30.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 2002. Purity and Danger, an Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Florence: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, T. H. 2016. “Social Anthropology and the Shifting Discourses about Immigrants in Norway.” In Engaged Anthropology: Views from Scandinavian, edited by S. Bendixen and T. Bringa, 99–120. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 2005. “Bookmarks for Public Sociologists.” The British Journal of Sociology 56 (3): 373–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjos.2005.56.issue-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. S. 2008. “Defining the Public, Defining Sociology: Hybrid Science—Public Relations and Boundary-work in Early American Sociology.” Public Understandings of Science 18 (1): 5–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grønvad, J., and L. G. Johansson. 2016. “Research Style and Extra-Academic Engagement of Humanities Researchers.” In Mapping Frontier Research in the Humanities, edited by C. Emmeche, D. Budtz Pedersen and F. Stjernfelt, 17–40. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsen, R., and P. Sauer. 2015a. “Vi dræber dig om 14 dage.” Jyllands-Posten, September 20.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsen, R., and P. Sauer. 2015b. “Politikere: Fuldstændigt uacceptabelt.” Jyllands-Posten, September 20.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar, T. 2003. “Migration and Refugee Studies: Reflections about the Field’s Political Impact and University Status.” In Migration and Migrants: Between Policy and Reality, edited by J. Doomernik and H. Knippenberg, 918. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Hervik, P. 2013. “‘Er Danskerne Racister?’ Læs Bogen Og Spild Tiden.” Accessed 12 December 2019. http://www.peterhervik.dk/?p=162
   Google Scholar
• Hervik, P. 2018. “Racialization in the Nordic Countries: An Introduction.” In Racialization, Racism, and Anti-Racism in the Nordic Countries, edited by P. Hervik, 3–38. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, S. J., K. Weibel, and T. G. Jensen. 2017. “Stereotyper og fjendebilleder: En undersøgelse af udvalgte, danske mediers fremstilling af muslimer og islam.” Tidsskrift for Islamforskning 7 (2): 114–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/tifo.v7i2.25320.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. B. 2011. “Understanding the Research–Policy Nexus in Denmark and Sweden: The Field of Migration and Integration.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 13 (1): 93–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00441.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, B. 1994. Authority: Construction and Corrosion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandaville, P. 2008. “Introduction: Secular Criticism and the Politics of Studying Islam.” Tidsskrift for Islamforskning 3 (2): 5–10. ( Special issue: Research on Islam Repositioned – New Agendas in the Study of Islam and Muslims in a Politicised Research Field). doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/tifo.v3i2.24564.
   Google Scholar
• Motta, M. 2018. “The Dynamic and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States.” American Politics Research 46 (3): 465–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17719507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A. 2019. “Anti-Intellectualism is a Virus.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (4): 357–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1462946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. F. 2002. “Nytårstale [New Year Address].” Accessed 12 December 2019. http://www.stm.dk/_p_7354.html
   Google Scholar
• Rigney, D. 1991. “Three Kinds of Anti-Intellectualism: Rethinking Hofstadter.” Sociological Inquiry 61: 434–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1991.tb00172.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhs, M., K. Tamas, and J. Palme. 2019. Bridging the Gaps: Linking Research to Public Debates and Policy Making on Migration and Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. 2008. “From Granting the Right (?!) Answers to Posing Odd Questions: Perspectives on Studying and Presenting Muslim Minorities in a Politicized, Western Context.” Tidsskrift for Islamforskning 3 (2): 11–26. ( Special issue: Research on Islam Repositioned – New Agendas in the Study of Islam and Muslims in a Politicised Research Field). doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/tifo.v3i2.24565.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. 2015. Nørrebros Indvandringshistorie 1885–2010. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. 2016. “Doing Research in a Politicized Field and Surviving It: Lessons Learned from Migration Research.” In Engaged Anthropology: Views from Scandinavian, edited by S. Bendixsen and T. Bringa, 61-77. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Suhr, C., and K. Sinclair. 2016. “Fakta og fiktion om muslimer i danske medier.” Tidsskrift for Islamforskning 10 (1): 134–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/tifo.v10i1.24878.
   Google Scholar
• University Law. 2015. Bekendtgørelse af lov om universiteter (universitetsloven), March 8.
   Google Scholar
• Vind, J. 2013. “Når man prædiker for de frelste.” Weekendavisen, January 11.
   Google Scholar
• Yalaz, E., and R. Zapata-Barrero. 2017. “Mapping the Qualitative Migration Research in Europe: An Exploratory Analysis.” Gritim Working Paper Series no. 32. Universitat Pompeu Fabra: Grup de Recerca Interdisciplinari en Immigració.
   Google Scholar