Towards a differentiated notion of the mainstream: superdiversity and residents’ conceptions of immigrant integration

References

• Alba, R., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2017. “What about the Mainstream? Assimilation in Super-diverse Times.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (1): 105–124. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1406127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, M. 2003. “Local Policies toward Migrants as an Expression of Host-stranger Relations. A Proposed Typology.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29 (3): 411–433. doi:10.1080/13691830305610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2013. “Categories of Analysis and Categories of Practice: A Note on the Study of Muslims in European Countries of Immigration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1080/01419870.2012.729674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caglar, A. 2016. “Still ‘Migrants’ after All Those Years: Foundational Mobilities, Temporal Frames and Emplacement of Migrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (6): 952–969. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, H., and D. Skleparis. 2018. “Refugees, Migrants, Neither, Both: Categorical Fetishism and the Politics of Bounding in Europe’s ‘Migration Crisis’.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (1): 48–64. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favell, A. 2001. “Integration Policy and Integration Research in Europe: A Review and Critique.” In Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices, edited by A. Aleinikoff and D. Klusmeyer, pp.349–399. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute/Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Foner, N., J. W. Duyvendak, and P. Kasinitz. 2017. “Introduction: Super-diversity in Everyday Life.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1406969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick-Schiller, N., and A. Caglar. 2009. “Toward a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies: Migrant Incorporation and City Scale.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35 (2): 177–202. doi:10.1080/13691830802586179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick-Schiller, N., and A. Caglar. 2016. “Displacement, Emplacement and Migrant Newcomers: Rethinking Urban Sociabilities within Multiscalar Power.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 23 (1): 17–34. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2015.1016520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanhörster, H., and S. Wessendorf. 2020. “The Role of Arrival Areas for Migrant Integration and Resource Access.” Urban Planning 5 (3): 1–10. doi:10.17645/up.v5i3.2891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kešić, J., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2019. “The Nation under Threat: Secularist, Racial and Populist Nativism in the Netherlands.” Patterns of Prejudice 53 (5): 441–463. doi:10.1080/0031322X.2019.1656886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarenbeek, L. M. 2018. “Relational Integration: A Response to Willem Schinkel.” Comparative Migration Studies 7 (20): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Local newspaper name anonymized. 2015. “Article from 24 November.”
   Google Scholar
• Mepschen, P. 2019. “A Discourse of Displacement: Super-diversity, Urban Citizenship, and the Politics of Autochthony in Amsterdam.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (1): 71–88. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1406967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2013. “Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?”.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02065.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Municipality name anonymized 2008. “[Title Omitted for Reasons of Anonymization].”
   Google Scholar
• Municipality name anonymized. 2015. Statistical Yearbook.
   Google Scholar
• Penninx, R., and B. Garcés-Mascareñas, Eds. 2016. Integration Processes and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors. Cham:Springer Open
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and M. Zhou. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530 (1): 74–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, M. 2016. European Cities, Municipal Organizations and Diversity: The New Politics of Difference. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2018. “Against ‘Immigrant Integration’: For an End to Neo-colonial Knowledge Production.” Comparative Migration Studies 6 (31): 1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholten, P. 2019.“Mainstreaming versus Alienation: Conceptualizing the Role of Complexity in Migration and Diversity Policymaking.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 46:1, 108-126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2007. “Super-diversity and Its Implications.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2015. “Introduction: Formulating Diversity Studies.” In Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies, edited by S. Vertovec, pp. 1-20. Routledge: London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, B., and S. Karakayali. 2018. “The Volatility of the Discourse on Refugees in Germany.” Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16 (1–2): 118–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wekker, F. 2019. “‘We Have to Teach Them Diversity’: On Demographic Transformations and Lived Reality in an Amsterdam Working-class Neighbourhood.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (1): 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S. 2013. “Commonplace Diversity and the Ethos of Mixing: Perceptions of Difference in a London Neighbourhood.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 20 (4): 407–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, A. 2005. “Hope and Belonging in a Multicultural Suburb.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 26 (1–2): 171–186.
   Google Scholar