Organizational Transformations in Community Design Centers: An Analysis through Giddens’ Theory of Structuration Framework

References

• Angotti, T., Doble, C., & Horrigan, P. (2011). At the boundaries: The shifting sites of service-learning in design and planning. In T. Angotti, C. Doble, & P. Horrigan (Eds.), Service learning in design and planning (pp. 1–16). Oakland, CA: New Village.
   Google Scholar
• Axelroth, R., & Dubb, S. (2010). The road half traveled: university engagement at a crossroads. Retrieved from http://www.community-wealth.org/_pdfs/news/recent-articles/10-10/report-axelroth-dubb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, S. (2003). Community design: An alternative practice. In R. Shibley, & D. Watson Eds., Time saver standards for urban design (pp. 4.11). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Retrieved from http://www.cddcinc.org/articles.htm
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 18, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 12–23. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_3/pdf/bowen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L., & Mitgang, L. D. (1996). Building community: A new future for architecture education and practice: A special report. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, P. C., & Godsil, R. D. (2009). Retooling HUD for a catalytic federal government: A report to Secretary Shaun Donovan. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Institute for Urban Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cary Jr., J. (Ed.). (2000). The ACSA Sourcebook of Community Design Programs at Schools of Architecture in North America. Washington, DC: Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chell, E. (2004a). Critical incident technique. In C. Cassell, & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 45–60). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chell, E. (2004b). Critical incident technique. In M. S. Lewis-BeckA. Bryman & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (Vol. 3, pp. 219–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781412950589.n194
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, I. J. (1989). Structuration theory: Anthony Giddens and the constitution of social life. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Comerio, M. C. (1984). Community design: Idealism and entrepreneurship. In H. Sanoff (Ed.), Participatory design theory & techniques (pp. 21–38). Raleigh, NC: Bookmasters.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, R. (2004). Community design centers. In B. Bell, (Ed.), Good Deeds, Good Design: Community Service through Architecture (pp. 61–70). New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, R. & Ferebee, A. (2005). What is the role of university-based outreach programs in urban design education? Newsletter of the Institute of Urban Design, 21(2). Retrieved from http://www.communitydesign.net/images/UDsurveytable_rc_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, A. O. (1976). Community design centers: Practicing ‘social architecture’. AIA Journal, 65(1), 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, T. (1991). The hidden curriculum and the design studio: Toward a critical studio pedagogy. In T. A. Dutton (Ed.), Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy (pp. 165–194). New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–330. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, D., & Brody, J. (2014). The state of community design: An analysis of community design center services. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 31(3), 181–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. (2008). Foreword: Public-interest architecture: A needed and inevitable change. In B. Bell, & K. Wakeford (Eds.), Expanding architecture: Design as activism (pp. 8–13). New York, NY: Metropolis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. J. (1999). A typology of institutionalization for university-community partnerships at American universities and an underlying epistemology of engagement ( Doctoral dissertation). Available from Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9966373).
   Google Scholar
• Francis, M. (1983). Community design. Journal of Architectural Education, 37(1), 14–19. doi:10.1080/10464883.1983.11102642
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., & Mullins, R. L., Jr. (2005). Promise and betrayal: universities and the battle for sustainable urban neighborhoods. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. The Academy of Management Review, 15, 584–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, R. (Ed.). (1984). The scope of social architecture. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Heinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Hester, R. T., Jr. (1990). Community design primer. Mendocino, CA: Ridge Times Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivy, R. A. (2005). Editorial: It’s in the air. Architectural Record, 193(5), 25. Retrieved from http://www.architecturalrecord.construction.com/opinions/editorials/archives/0505.asp
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: The case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14, 299–309. doi:10.1023/A:1008184601282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marullo, S., & Edwards, B. (2000). Service-learning pedagogy as universities’ response to troubled times. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 746–755. doi:10.1177/00027640021955568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D. (2010). Community design centers: An organizational analysis ( Unpublished applied research/option paper). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, R. (2001). Community design. In A. Pressman (Ed.), Architectural design portable handbook (pp. 400–412). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrander, S. A. (2004). Democracy, civic participation, and the university: A comparative study of civic engagement on five campuses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 74–93. doi:10.1177/0899764003260588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, J., & Robbins, M. (Eds.). (2002). University-community design partnerships: Innovations in practice. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Perkes, D. (2009). A useful practice. Journal of Architectural Education, 62(4), 64–71. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2009.1005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31, 161–170. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, P. (1983). A structurationist account of political culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 414–437. doi:10.2307/2392250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, M. (2005). Where do we go from here? An evaluative framework for community-based design. In J. Hous, M. Francis, & N. Brightbill (Eds.), (Re)constructing communities design participation in the face of change (pp. 24–30). Davis, CA: UC Davis, Center for Design Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, A. W. (2000). History of community design. In J. Cary, Jr. (Ed.), The ACSA sourcebook of community design programs at schools of architecture in North America (pp. 49–56). Washington, DC: Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, A. W. (2006). Introduction: the pedagogy of engagement. In M. C. Hardin, R. A. Eribes, & C. Poster (Eds.), From the studio to the streets: Service-learning in Planning and Architecture (pp. 1–16). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Selcer, A. D. (2004). Structuration, discourse, and power: How corporate employees construct meaning in their organization ( Dissertation Abstracts International; UMI No. 3166426).
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29. doi:10.1086/229967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, L. J. H. (2006, October). Understandings of technology in community-based organisations: A structurational analysis ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Melbourne, Australia: Monash University. Retrieved from http://webstylus.net/files/Stillman%20Thesis%20Revised%20Jan30.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toker, Z. (2007). Recent trends in community design: The eminence of participation. Design Studies, 28, 309–323. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toker, Z., & Toker, U. (2006). Community design in its Pragmatist age: Increasing popularity and changing outcomes. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 23(2), 155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Trunnen, H., Tossavainnen, K., & Vertio, H. (2004). How can critical incidents be used to describe health promotion in the Finnish European Network of Health Promoting Schools? Health Promotion International, 19, 419–427. doi:10.1093/heapro/dah403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, A. (1996). The suppression of the social in design: Architecture as war. In T. A. Dutton, & L. H. Mann (Eds.), Reconstructing architecture: Critical discourses and social practices (pp. 27–70). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Wates, N., & Knevitt, C. (1987). Community architecture: How people are creating their own environment. London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, J. (1997). Using Giddens’ structuration theory to inform business history. Business and Economic History, 26(1), 159–183.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar