The emergence of the emergence-based approach in community practice

References

• Averbuch, T. (2013). The little engine that could. Challenging Organizations and Society Reflective Hybrids, 2(2), 333–352.
   Google Scholar
• Averbuch, T. (2015). Entering, readiness and contracting for dialogic organization development. In G. R. Bushe & R. J. Marshak (Eds.), Dialogic organization development: The theory and practice of transformational change (pp. 219–244). Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Bazell Satariano, N., & Wong, A. (2012). Creating an online strategy to enhance effective community building and organizing. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health and welfare (3rd ed., pp. 269–287). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, A., & Cnaan, R. A. (2012). Towards a practice-based model for community practice: Linking theory and practice. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 39(1), 141–168.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, R., & Nair, M. D. (2003). Macro practice: A generalist approach (6th ed.). Middleton, IL: Gregory Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R. (2010). Being the container in dialogic OD. Practicing Social Change, 2, 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R., & Marshak, R. J. (2009). Revisioning organization development, diagnostic and dialogic premises and patterns of practice. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(3), 348–368. doi:10.1177/0021886309335070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R., & Marshak, R. J. (2015). Introduction to the dialogic organization development mindset. In G. R. Bushe & R. J. Marshak (Eds.), Dialogic organization development: The theory and practice of transformational change (pp. 11–32). Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25. doi:10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2012). The garbage can model of organizational choice: Looking forward at forty. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 36, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Corning, P. A. (2002). The re-emergence of “emergence”: A venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity, 7(6), 18–30. doi:10.1002/cplx.10043
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Gaventa, J. (2000). From users and choosers to makers and shapers: Repositioning participation in social policy. Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L., & Lorenz, W. (2017). Beyond racial divides. Ethnicities in social work practice. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2012). Digital dead end: Fighting for social justice in the information age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, N. G., & Weil, M. (2010). Community practice skills. Local to global perspectives. New York, NY: Colombia university press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Selected essays by Clifford Geertz. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A. (2009). The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardcastle, D. A., Powers, P. R., & Wenocur, S. (2011). Community practice. Theories and skills for social workers (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardina, D. (2002). Analytical skills for community organization practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, P. (2010). Engaging emergence. Turning upheaval into opportunity. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, P. (2015). Complexity, self-organizations, and emergence. In G. R. Bushe & R. J. Marshak (Eds.), Dialogic organization development: The theory and practice of transformational change (pp. 123–159). Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labonate, R. (2012). Community, community development and the forming of authentic partnerships: Some critical reflections. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health and welfare (3rd ed., pp. 95–109). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshak, R. J. (2010). OD morphogenesis: The emerging dialogic platform of premises. Practicing Social Change, 2, 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, F. (2008). Teaching community development to social work students: A critical reflection. Community Development Journal, 44(2), 248–262. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsn001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5–22. doi:10.1191/1464993402ps027ra
   Google Scholar
• National Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation. (2010). Resource guide for public deliberation. Retrieved from http://www.ncdd.org/files/NCDD2010_Resource_Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Netting, F. E., Kettner, P. M., & McMurtry, S. L. (Eds.). (2010). Social work macro practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Onyx, J., & Leonard, R. J. (2011). Complex systems leadership in emergent community projects. Community Development Journal, 46(4), 493–510. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsq041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. (2017). Qualitative methods in social work research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sadan, E. (2015). Community planning. In C. Franklin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Work. National Association of Social Workers Press and Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.1164
   Google Scholar
• Sadan, E., & Churchman, A. (1997). Process-focused and product-focused community planning: Two variations of empowering professional practice. Community Development Journal, 32(1), 3–16. doi:10.1093/cdj/32.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. (1962). On multiple realities. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers I. Phaenomenologica (Vol. 11, pp. 207–259). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shemer, O. (2014). Community dialogue. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), The sage encyclopedia of action research (Vol. 1, pp. 143–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shemer, O. (2016). צמיחתה של החממה למנהיגות רב-תרבותית בשדרות. אזרחות צעירה בפריפריה [The growing-up of the multi-cultural leadership incubator in Sderot. Young civil-society in the periphery]. Sderot, Israel: Research Report for Hanns Seidel Foundation. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Shemer, O., & Schmid, H. (2007). Toward a new definition of community partnership: A three dimensional approach. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 35(2), 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. (2000). Cynefin: A sense of time and space. The social ecology of knowledge management. In C. Despres & D. Chauvel (Eds.), Knowledge horizons: The present and the promise of knowledge management (pp. 237–266). Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, P. (2016). Understanding community. Politics, policy and practice (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toomey, A. H. (2011). Empowerment and disempowerment in community development practice: Eight roles practitioners play. Community Development Journal, 46(2), 181–195. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsp060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil, M. O., Gamble, D. N., & Ohmer, M. L. (2013). Evolution, models, and the changing context of community practice. In M. O. Weil, M. Reisch, & M. L. Ohmer (Eds.), The handbook of community practice (pp. 167–193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Westoby, P., & Kaplan, A. (2014). Foregrounding practice – Reaching for a responsive and ecological approach to community development: A conversational inquiry into the dialogical and developmental frameworks of community development. Community Development Journal, 49(2), 214–227. doi:10.1093/cdj/bst037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. Description, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar