Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Community Practice Volume 31, 2023 - Issue 3-4: Collaborations in Community Engaged Research
Submit an article Journal homepage
209
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Challenges in Community-Engaged Research: Advancing Promising Solutions

Navigating, subverting, and replacing conventional academic structures and expectations to co-create with participatory action research (PAR) teams: where to for PAR scholarship?

Danielle Maude Littmana College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5708-4511
ORCID Icon,
Anna Ortega-Williamsb Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, USA
,
Ramona Beltránc Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, USA
,
M. Alex Wagamand School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
,
Kimberly Benderc Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, USA
&
Laura Wernicke Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York, USA
Pages 466-487 | Published online: 19 Oct 2023

References

  • The A4BL Anti-racist Tenure Letter Working Group. (2022, November 15). Equity, diversity and inclusion: A guide for writing anti-racist tenure and promotion letters eLife 11, Article e79892. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79892
  • Anderson, C. R. (2020). Confronting the institutional, interpersonal and internalized challenges of performing critical public scholarship. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 19(1), 270–302. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1786
  • Annamma, S., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/Ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
  • Berne, P., Morales, A. L., Langstaff, D., & Sins Invalid. (2018). Ten Principles of disability justice. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 46(1–2), 227–230.
  • Brown, N., & Leigh, J. (2018). Ableism in academia: Where are the disabled and ill academics? Disability & Society, 33(6), 985–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1455627
  • Cancian, F. (1993). Conflicts between activist research and academic success: Participatory research and alternative strategies. American Sociologist, 24(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691947
  • Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2016). Collaborative autoethnography. Routledge.
  • Fanelli, D. (2020). Pressures to publish: What effects do we see? In M. Biagioli & A. Lippman (Eds.), Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research (pp. 111–122). The MIT Press. https://escholarship.org/content/qt6096m1sp/qt6096m1sp.pdf#page=121
  • Grigely, J. (2017). The neglected demographic: Faculty members with disabilities. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 63(41). https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Neglected-Demographic-/240439
  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
  • Littman, D. M., Bender, K., Mollica, M., Erangey, J., Lucas, T., & Marvin, C. (2021). Making power explicit: Using values and power mapping to guide power‐diverse participatory action research processes. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(2), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22456
  • Moore, J. (2004). Living in the basement of the ivory tower: A graduate student’s perspective of participatory action research within academic institutions. Educational Action Research, 12(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790400200233
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2021). NASW code of ethics. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
  • Ochocka, J., Moorlag, E., & Janzen, R. (2010). A framework for entry: PAR values and engagement strategies in community research. Interaction Studies, 3, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v3i0.1328
  • Okun, T. (2023, August). White Supremacy Culture. https://www.whitesupremacyculture.info/
  • Rigney, L. I. (1999). Internationalization of an Indigenous anticolonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to indigenist research methodology and its principles. Wicazo Sa Review, 14(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1409555
  • Rodriguez, L. F., & Brown, T. M. (2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 2009(123), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.312
  • Smith Brice, T., & McLane-Davison, D. (2020). The strength of black families: The elusive ties of perspective and praxis in social work education. In A. N. Mendenhall & M. M. Carney (Eds.), Rooted in strengths: Celebrating the strengths perspective in social work (pp. 25–37). University of Kansas Libraries. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/30023
  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Snyder, T. D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2015 (NCES 2016-014). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016014.pdf
  • Society for Social Work and Research. (2023, January 11-15). Social work science and complex problems: Battling inequalities and building solutions [Conference program]. Society for Social Work and Research 27th Annual Conference, Phoenix, AZ, United States. https://secure.sswr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/SSWR-27th-Annual-Conference-Conference-Agenda.pdf
  • Stoecker, R., & Bonacich, E. (1992). Why participatory research? Guest editor’s introduction. American Sociologist, 23(4), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691927
  • Vaughn, L. M., & Jacquez, F. (2020). Participatory research methods – choice points in the research process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244
  • Wernick, L. (2023). Learning disability justice through critical participatory action research. In M. Mills & R. Sanchez (Eds.), Crip authorship: Disability as method (pp. 99–107). New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479819386.003.0012

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.