429
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Structural Equation Model at the Individual and Group Level for Assessing Faking-Related Change

&
Pages 91-109 | Published online: 07 Jan 2011

REFERENCES

  • Barrick , M. R. and Mount , M. K. 1991 . The Big-Five personality dimensions and job performance . Personnel Psychology , 44 : 1 – 26 .
  • Bentler , P. M. and Bonett , D. G. 1980 . Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures . Psychological Bulletin , 88 : 588 – 606 .
  • Browne , M. W. and Cudeck , R. 1993 . “ Alternative ways of assessing model fit. ” . In Testing structural equation models Edited by: Bollen , K. A. and Long , J. S. 136 – 162 . Newbury Park, CA : Sage. .
  • Burns , G. N. and Christiansen , N. D. 2006 . “ Sensitive or senseless: On the use of social desirability measures in selection and assessment. ” . In A closer examination of applicant faking behavior Edited by: Griffith , R. L. and Peterson , M. H. 113 – 148 . Greenwich, CT : Information Age. .
  • Cohen , J. 1988 . Set correlation and contingency tables . Applied Psychological Measurement , 12 : 425 – 434 .
  • Dilchert , S. , Ones , D. S. , Viswesvaran , C. and Deller , J. 2006 . Response distortion in personality measurement: Born to deceive, yet capable of providing valid self-assessments? . Psychology Science , 48 : 209 – 225 .
  • Drasgow , F. , Levine , M. V. and Williams , E. A. 1985 . Appropriateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 38 : 67 – 86 .
  • Eysenck , H. J. and Eysenck , S. B. G. 1975 . Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London : Hodder & Stoughton. .
  • Eysenck , S. B. G. , Eysenck , H. J. and Barrett , P. T. 1985 . A revised version of the Psychoticism scale . Personality and Individual Differences , 6 : 21 – 29 .
  • Eysenck , S. B. G. , Eysenck , H. J. and Shaw , L. 1974 . The modification of personality and Lie scores by special “honestly” instructions . British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology , 13 : 41 – 50 .
  • Ferrando , P. J. 2002 . Theoretical and empirical comparisons between two models for continuous item responses . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 37 : 521 – 542 .
  • Ferrando , P. J. 2006 . Factor-analytic procedures for assessing response pattern scalability . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 42 : 481 – 507 .
  • Ferrando , P. J. 2009 . Difficulty, discrimination and information indices in the linear factor-analytic model for continuous responses . Applied Psychological Measurement , 33 : 9 – 24 .
  • Ferrando , P. J. and Anguiano-Carrasco , C. 2009 . Assessing the impact of faking on binary personality measures: An IRT-based multiple-group factor analytic procedure . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 44 : 497 – 524 .
  • Ferrando , P. J. , Chico , E. and Lorenzo , U. 1997 . Dimensional analysis of the EPQ-R Lie scale with a Spanish sample: Gender differences and relations to N, E, and P . Personality and Individual Differences , 30 : 641 – 656 .
  • Fiske , D. W. 1968 . Items and persons: Formal duals and psychological differences . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 3 : 393 – 401 .
  • Furnham , A. 1986 . Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation . Personality and Individual Differences , 7 : 385 – 400 .
  • Griffin , B. , Hesketh , B. and Grayson , D. 2004 . Applicants faking good: Evidence of item bias in the NEO PI–R . Personality and Individual Differences , 36 : 1545 – 1558 .
  • Griffith , R. L. and Peterson , M. H. 2006 . A closer examination of applicant faking behaviour. Greenwich, CT : Information Age. .
  • Griffith , R. L. and Peterson , M. H. 2008 . The failure of social desirability measures to capture applicant faking behavior . Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 1 : 308 – 311 .
  • Heise , D. R. 1969 . Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation . American Sociological Review , 34 : 93 – 101 .
  • Henry , M. S. and Raju , N. S. 2006 . The effects of traited and situational impression management on a personality test: An empirical analysis . Psychology Science , 48 : 247 – 267 .
  • Holden , R. R. Faking on noncognitive self-report: Seven primary questions . Paper presented at the ETS Mini-conference on Faking in Noncognitive Assessments . Princeton, NJ. September .
  • Holden , R. R. and Book , A. S. 2009 . Using hybrid Rasch-latent class modeling to improve the detection of fakers on a personality inventory . Personality and Individual Differences , 47 : 185 – 190 .
  • Hough , L. M. 1998 . Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives . Human Performance , 11 : 209 – 244 .
  • Jöreskog , K. G. 1971 . Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests . Psychometrika , 36 : 109 – 133 .
  • Jöreskog , K. G. 1979 . “ Statistical estimation of structural models in longitudinal-developmental investigations. ” . In Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development Edited by: Nesselroade , J. R. and Baltes , P. B. 263 – 302 . New York : Academic. .
  • Kenny , D. A. and Campbell , D. T. 1989 . On the measurement of stability in over-time data . Journal of Personality , 57 : 445 – 481 .
  • Lautenschlager , G. J. 1986 . Within-subject measures for the assessment of individual differences in faking . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 46 : 309 – 316 .
  • Levine , M. V. and Rubin , D. F. 1979 . Measuring the appropriateness of multiple-choice test scores . Journal of Educational Statistics , 4 : 269 – 290 .
  • Little , T. D. 1997 . Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 32 : 53 – 76 .
  • Lord , F. M. 1980 . Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. .
  • McArdle , J. J. 2009 . Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data . Annual Review of Psychology , 60 : 577 – 605 .
  • McDonald , R. P. 1982 . Linear vs. nonlinear models in item response theory . Applied Psychological Measurement , 6 : 379 – 396 .
  • McDonald , R. P. 1999 . Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. .
  • McFarland , L. A. and Ryan , A. M. 2000 . Variance in faking across noncognitive measures . Journal of Applied Psychology , 85 : 812 – 821 .
  • McFarland , L. A. and Ryan , A. M. 2006 . Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 36 : 979 – 1016 .
  • Meade , A. W. , Johnson , E. C. and Braddy , P. W. 2008 . Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance . Journal of Applied Psychology , 93 : 568 – 592 .
  • Meijer , R. R. and Sijtsma , K. 1995 . Detection of aberrant item scores patterns: A review and new developments . Applied Measurement in Education , 8 : 261 – 272 .
  • Mersman , J. L. and Shultz , K. S. 1998 . Individual differences in the ability to fake on personality measures . Personality and Individual Differences , 24 : 217 – 227 .
  • Mesmer-Magnus , J. and Viswesvaran , C. 2006 . “ Assessing response distortion in personality tests: A review of research designs and analytic strategies. ” . In A closer examination of applicant faking behaviour Edited by: Griffith , R. L. and Peterson , M. H. 85 – 113 . Greenwich, CT : Information Age. .
  • Morgeson , F. P. , Campion , M. A. , Dipboye , R. L. , Hollenbeck , J. R. , Murphy , K. and Schmitt , N. 2007 . Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts . Personnel Psychology , 60 : 683 – 729 .
  • Mueller-Hanson , R. A. , Heggestad , E. D. and Thornton , G. C. 2006 . Individual differences in impression management: An exploration of the psychological process underlying faking . Psychology Science , 48 : 288 – 312 .
  • Muthén , B. O. 1984 . A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered, categorical and continuous latent variable indicators . Psychometrika , 49 : 115 – 132 .
  • Muthén , B. O. and Lehman , J. 1985 . Multiple group IRT modeling: Applications to item bias analysis . Journal of Educational Statistics , 10 : 133 – 142 .
  • Muthén , L. K. and Muthén , B. O. 2007 . Mplus user's guide, , 5th ed. Los Angeles : Muthén & Muthén. .
  • Paulhus , D. L. 1991 . “ Measurement and control of response bias. ” . In Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes Edited by: Robinson , J. P. , Shaver , P. R. and Wrightsman , L. S. 17 – 59 . San Diego, CA : Academic Press. .
  • Pitts , S. C. , West , S. G. and Tein , J. 1996 . Longitudinal measurement models in evaluation research: Examining stability and change . Evaluation and Program Planning , 19 : 333 – 350 .
  • Quist , J. S. , Arora , S. and Griffith , R. L. The association of social desirability and applicant response distortion: A validation study . Paper presented at the 22nd annual Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology conference . New York. April .
  • Robie , C. , Zickar , M. J. and Schmit , M. J. 2001 . Measurement equivalence between applicant and incumbent groups: An IRT analysis of personality scales . Human Performance , 14 : 187 – 207 .
  • Salgado , J. F. 1997 . The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community . Journal of Applied Psychology , 82 : 30 – 43 .
  • Samejima , F. 1969 . Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores . Psychometrika Monograph Supplement , 34 : 1 – 100 .
  • Satorra , A. 2000 . “ Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. ” . In Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis: A festschrift for Heinz Neudecker Edited by: Heijmans , D. D. H. , Pollock , D. S. G. and Satorra , A. 233 – 247 . Dordrecht, , Netherlands : Kluwer Academic. .
  • Shadish , W. R. , Cook , T. D. and Campbell , D. T. 2002 . Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston : Houghton Mifflin. .
  • Takane , Y. and de Leeuw , J. 1987 . On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables . Psychometrika , 52 : 393 – 408 .
  • Tisak , J. and Meredith , W. 1990 . “ Longitudinal factor analysis. ” . In Statistical methods in longitudinal research: Vol. I. Principles and structuring Edited by: von Eye , A. 125 – 149 . New York : Academic Press. .
  • Viswesvaran , C. and Ones , D. S. 1999 . Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 59 : 197 – 210 .
  • Wainer , H. and Mislevy , R. J. 2000 . “ Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. ” . In Computerized adaptive testing: A primer Edited by: Wainer , H. 61 – 100 . Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. .
  • Webster , H. and Bereiter , C. 1963 . “ The reliability of changes measured by mental test scores. ” . In Problems in measuring change Edited by: Harris , C. W. 39 – 59 . Madison, WI : University of Wisconsin Press. .
  • Wrensen , L. B. and Biderman , M. D. Factors related to faking ability: A structural equation model application . Paper presented at the 20th annual Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference . Los Angeles, CA. April .
  • Zickar , M. J. and Drasgow , F. 1996 . Detecting faking on a personality instrument using appropriateness measurement . Applied Psychological Measurement , 20 : 71 – 87 .
  • Zickar , M. J. and Gibby , R. E. 2006 . “ A history of faking and socially desirable responding on personality tests. ” . In A closer examination of applicant faking behavior Edited by: Griffith , R. L. and Peterson , M. H. 21 – 42 . Greenwich, CT : Information Age. .
  • Zickar , M. J. and Robie , C. 1999 . Modeling faking good on personality items: An item-level analysis . Journal of Applied Psychology , 84 : 551 – 563 .
  • Zimowski , M. , Muraki , E. , Mislevy , R. J. and Bock , R. D. 2003 . BILOG-MG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Chicago : Scientific Software. .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.