Review of Diagnostic Measurement: Theories, Methods, and Applications

REFERENCES

• Beaton , A. E. and Allen , N. L. 1992 . Interpreting scales through scale anchoring . Journal of Educational Statistics , 17 : 191 – 204 .
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom , D. , Mellenbergh , G. J. and van Heerden , J. 2004 . The concept of validity . Psychological Review , 111 : 1061 – 1071 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach , L. J. and Meehl , P. E. 1955 . Construct validity in psychological test . Psychological Bulletin , 52 : 281 – 302 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formann , A. K. 1992 . Linear logistic latent class analysis for polytomous data . Journal of American Statistical Association , 87 : 476 – 486 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberman , S. J. and von Davier , M. 2006 . “ Some notes on models for cognitively based skills diagnosis. ” . In Handbook of statistics, 26: Psychometrics Edited by: Rao , C. R. and Sinharay , S. 1031 – 1038 . Amsterdam , , The Netherlands : Elsevier North-Holland. .
   Google Scholar
• Haberman , S. J. , von Davier , M. and Lee , Y. 2008 . Comparison of multidimensional item response models: Multivariate normal ability distributions versus multivariate polytomous ability distributions Princeton , NJ : ETS. . (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-08–45)
   Google Scholar
• Heinen , T. 1996 . Latent class and discrete latent trait models, similarities and differences. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage. .
   Google Scholar
• Holland , P. W. and Rosenbaum , P. R. 1986 . Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models . The Annals of Statistics , 14 : 1523 – 1543 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker , B. W. and Sijtsma , K. 2000 . Latent and manifest monotonicity in item response models . Applied Psychological Measurement , 24 : 65 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker , B. W. and Sijtsma , K. 2001 . Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory . Applied Psychological Measurement , 25 : 258 – 272 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubinger , K. 2006 . Psychological assessment: Theory and practice. Gottingen , , Germany : Hogrefe. .
   Google Scholar
• Maris , G. and Bechger , T. 2009 . Equivalent diagnostic classification models . Measurement , 7 : 41 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• McDonald , R. P. 1994 . “ Testing for approximate dimensionality. ” . In Modern theories of measurement: Problems and issues Edited by: Laveault , D. , Zumbo , B. , Gessaroli , M. and Boss , M. 63 – 85 . Ottawa , , Canada : University of Ottawa Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Messick , S. 1989 . “ Validity. ” . In Educational measurement, , 3rd ed. Edited by: Linn , R. 13 – 103 . New York : Macmillan. .
   Google Scholar
• Roussos , L. 1994 . Summary and review of cognitive diagnosis models. Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Rupp , A. A. and Templin , J. L. 2008 . Unique characteristics of diagnostic classification models: A comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art . Measurement , 6 : 219 – 262 .
   Google Scholar
• Sinharay , S. and Haberman , S. J. 2009 . How much can we reliably know about what examinees know? . Measurement , 7 : 46 – 49 .
   Google Scholar
• Stout , W. 1987 . A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality . Psychometrika , 52 : 589 – 617 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka , K. K. 1983 . Rule-space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory . Journal of Educational Measurement , 20 : 345 – 354 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Abswoude , A. A. H. , Van der Ark , L. A. and Sijtsma , K. 2004 . A comparative study on test dimensionality assessment procedures under nonparametric IRT models . Applied Psychological Measurement , 28 : 3 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt , J. K. 1997 . LEM1.0: A general program for the analysis of categorical data. Tilburg , , The Netherlands : Tilburg University. .
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt , J. K. and Magidson , J. 2005 . Latent GOLD 4.0 user's guide. Belmont , MA : Statistical Innovations. .
   Google Scholar
• von Davier , M. 2005 . A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data Princeton , NJ : ETS. . (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-05–16)
   Google Scholar
• von Davier , M. 2007 . Hierarchical general diagnostic models Princeton , NJ : ETS. . (ETS Research Rep. RR-07–19)
   Google Scholar
• von Davier , M. 2009a . “ Mixture distribution item response theory, latent class analysis, and diagnostic mixture models. ” . In Measuring psychological constructs: Advances in model-based approaches Edited by: Embretson , S. 11 – 34 . New York , NY : APA Press. .
   Google Scholar
• von Davier , M. 2009b . Some notes on the reinvention of latent structure models as diagnostic classification models . Measurement , 7 : 67 – 74 .
   Google Scholar
• Xu , X. 2007 . Monotone properties of a general diagnostic model Princeton , NJ : ETS. . (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-07–25)
   Google Scholar
• Xu , X. and von Davier , M. 2006 . Cognitive diagnosis for NAEP proficiency data Princeton , NJ : ETS. . (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-06–28)
   Google Scholar
• Xu , X. and von Davier , M. 2008a . Comparing multiple-group multinomial loglinear models for multidimensional skill distributions in the general diagnostic model Princeton , NJ : ETS. . (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-08–35)
   Google Scholar
• Xu , X. and von Davier , M. 2008b . Fitting the structured general diagnostic model to NAEP data Princeton , NJ : ETS. . (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-08–27)
   Google Scholar
• Xu , X. and von Davier , M. 2008c . Linking with the general diagnostic models . IERI Monograph Series—Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessment , 1 : 97 – 112 .
   Google Scholar
• Zhang , J. and Stout , W. 1999 . The theoretical DETECT index of dimensionality and its application to approximate simple structure . Psychometrika , 64 : 213 – 249 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick , R. , Senturk , D. , Wang , J. and Loomis , S. C. 2001 . An investigation of alternative methods for item mapping on the National Assessment of Educational Progress . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices , 20 : 15 – 25 .
   Google Scholar