Additive Models for Multitrait–Multimethod Data With a Multiplicative Trait–Method Relationship: A Simulation Study

REFERENCES

• Bagozzi , R. P. and Yi , Y. 1990 . Assessing method variance in multitrait–multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work . Journal of Applied Psychology , 75 : 547 – 560 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi , R. P. and Yi , Y. 1991 . Multitrait–multimethod matrices in consumer research . Journal of Consumer Research , 17 : 426 – 439 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi , R. P. , Yi , Y. and Phillips , L. W. 1991 . Assessing construct validity in organizational research . Administrative Science Quarterly , 36 : 421 – 458 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker , T. E. and Cote , J. A. 1994 . Additive and multiplicative effects in applied psychological research: An empirical assessment of three models . Journal of Management , 20 : 625 – 641 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beretvas , S. N. , Meyers , J. L. and Leite , W. L. 2002 . A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 62 : 570 – 589 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne , M. 1984 . The decomposition of multitrait–multimethod matrices . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 37 : 1 – 21 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne , M. 1992 . MUTMUM user's guide , Columbus , OH : The Ohio State University .
   Google Scholar
• Byrne , B. M. and Goffin , R. D. 1993 . Modeling MTMM data from additive and multiplicative covariance structures: An audit of construct validity concordance . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 28 : 67 – 96 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell , D. T. and Fiske , D. W. 1959 . Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix . Psychological Bulletin , 56 : 81 – 105 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell , D. T. and O'Connell , E. J. 1967 . Methods factors in multitrait–multimethod matrices: Multiplicative rather additive? . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 2 : 409 – 426 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenders , G. and Saris , W. E. 2000 . Testing nested additive, multiplicative and general multitrait–multimethod models . Structural Equation Modeling , 7 : 219 – 250 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen , J. 1973 . Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 33 : 107 – 112 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway , J. M. 1996 . Analysis and design of multitrait–multirater performance appraisal studies . Journal of Management , 22 : 139 – 162 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway , J. M. , Lievens , F. , Scullen , S. E. and Lance , C. E. 2004 . Bias in the correlated uniqueness model for MTMM data . Structural Equation Modeling , 11 : 535 – 559 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coovert , M. D. , Craiger , J. P. and Teachout , M. S. 1997 . Effectiveness of the direct product versus confirmatory factor model for reflecting the structure of multimethod–multirater job performance data . Journal of Applied Psychology , 82 : 271 – 280 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corten , I. W. , Saris , W. E. , Coenders , G. , Van der Veld , W. , Aalberts , C. E. and Kornelis , C. 2002 . Fit of different models for multitrait–multimethod experiments . Structural Equation Modeling , 9 : 213 – 232 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierdorff , E. C. and Wilson , M. A. 2003 . A meta-analysis of job analysis reliability . Journal of Applied Psychology , 88 : 635 – 646 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid , M. 2000 . A multitrait–multimethod model with minimal assumptions . Psychometrika , 65 : 241 – 261 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid , M. , Lischetzke , T. , Nussbeck , F. W. and Trierweiler , L. I. 2003 . Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait–multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT–C (M–1) model . Psychological Methods , 8 : 38 – 60 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffin , R. D. and Jackson , D. 1992 . Analysis of multitrait–multirater performance appraisal data: composite direct product method versus confirmatory factor analysis . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 27 : 363 – 385 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández , A. and González-Romá , V . 2002 . Analysis of the multitrait–multioccasion data: Additive versus multiplicative models . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 37 : 59 – 87 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogland , J. J. and Boomsma , A. 1998 . Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis . Sociological Methods & Research , 26 : 329 – 367 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1999 . cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives . Structural Eqution Modeling , 6 : 1 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny , D. A. 1976 . An empirical application of confirmatory factor analysis to the multitrait–multimethod matrix . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 65 : 507 – 516 .
   Google Scholar
• Kenny , D. A. and Kashy , D. A. 1992 . Analysis of the multitrait–multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis . Psychological Bulletin , 112 : 165 – 172 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar , A. and Dillon , W. R. 1992 . An integrative look at the use of additive and multiplicative covariance structure models in the analysis of MTMM data . Journal of Marketing Research , 29 : 51 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance , C. E. , Noble , C. L. and Scullen , S. E. 2002 . A critique of the correlated trait–correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait–multimethod data . Psychological Methods , 7 : 228 – 244 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. 1989 . Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait–multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions . Applied Psychological Measurement , 13 : 335 – 361 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. and Bailey , M. 1991 . Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait–multimethod data: A comparison of alternative models . Applied Psychological Measurement , 15 : 47 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén , L. and Muthén , B. 2010 . Mplus (Version 6.0) , Los Angeles , CA : Muthén & Muthén .
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team2010R A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org (http://www.R-project.org)
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, Michael C., & Maeda, Yukiko. (2006). Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha. Psychological Methods, 11, 306–322.
   Google Scholar
• Swain , A. J. 1975 . Analysis of parametric structures for variance matrices , Australia : University of Adelaide . Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Peterson , R. A. 1994 . A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha . Journal of Consumer Research , 21 : 381 – 391 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindskopf , D. and Rose , T. 1988 . Some theory and applications of confirmatory second order factor analysis . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 23 : 51 – 67 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomás , J. M. , Hontangas , P. M. and Oliver , A. 2000 . Linear confirmatory factor models to evaluate multitrait–multimethod matrices: The effects of number of indicators and correlation among methods . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 35 : 469 – 499 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacha-Haase , T. and Thompson , B. 2011 . Score reliability: A retrospective look back at 12 years of reliability generalization studies . Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development , 44 : 159 – 168 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widaman , K. F. 1985 . Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait–multimethod data . Applied Psychological Measurement , 9 : 1 – 26 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar