The Analysis of Multivariate Group Differences Using Common Principal Components

REFERENCES

• Alder, K. (2002). The measure of all things: The seven-year odyssey and hidden error that transformed the world. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basilevsky, A. (1994). Statistical factor analysis and related methods: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bechger, T. M., & Maris, G. (2004). Structural equation modelling of multiple facet data: Extending models for multitrait–multimethod data. Psicológica, 25, 253–274.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cajon, J. (2000). History of the concept of allometry. American Zoologist, 40, 748–758.
   Google Scholar
• Diaconis, P. (1985). Theories of data analysis: From magical thinking through classical statistics. In D. C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & J. W. Tukey (Eds.), Exploring data tables, trends and shapes (pp. 1–36). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, C. V. (1996). Principal components analysis using LISREL 8. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, C. V., Bechger, T. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1999). Using structural equation modeling to fit models incorporating principal components. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 233–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, C. V., & Lubke, G. H. (2001). Viewing Spearman’s hypothesis from the perspective of multigroup PCA: A comment on Schönemann’s criticism. Intelligence, 29, 231–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1940). The precision of discriminant functions. Annals of Eugenics, 10, 422–429.
   Google Scholar
• Flury, B. D. (1984). Common principal components in K groups. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 892–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flury, B. D. (1986). Asymptotic theory for common principal components analysis. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 418–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flury, B. D. (1988). Common principal components and related multivariate models. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Flury, B., & Gautschi, W. (1986). An algorithm for simultaneous orthogonal transformation of several positive definite symmetric matrices to nearly diagonal form. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 7, 169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flury, B. D., Nel, D. G., & Pienaar, I. (1995). Simultaneous detection of shift in mean and variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1474–1481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flury, B. D., & Riedwyl, H. (1988). Multivariate statistics: A practical approach. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. J. (2001). A primer of multivariate statistics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1990). Matrix analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, P. (1963). Matrix algebra for social scientists. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. (1931). The generalization of Student’s ratio. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 2, 360–378.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 498–520.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T., Morgan, B. J. T., & Young, P. J. (1996). A simulation study of the use of principal components in linear discriminant analysis. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 55, 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kiers, H. A. L., & Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1994). Hierarchical relations between methods for simultaneous component analysis and a technique for rotation to a simple simultaneous structure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg, C. P., Neuenschwander, B. E., & Flury, B. D. (1996). Ontogeny and individual variation: Analysis of patterned covariance matrices with common principal components. Systematic Biology, 45, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolf, E. (1996). De lexicale vaardigheid van Surinaamse en Nederlandse kinderen [Lexical ability of children from Suriname and the Netherlands] (Unpubished master’s thesis). Faculty POW, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent variable and qualitative variables in econometrics (Econometric Society Monograph No. 3). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 2, 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (2002). What can we learn from the path equations?: Identifiability, constraints, equivalence. Psychometrika, 67, 225–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E., & Meredith, W. (1988). Component analysis in cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Psychometrika, 53, 123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, D. F. (1988). Multivariate statistical methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University, Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 2, 559–572.
   Google Scholar
• Rechner, A. C., & Christensen, W. F. (2012). Methods of multivariate analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurs, U. (1998). Verschillen in leesvaardigheid in eerste en tweede taal [Differencesin reading ability in first and second language]. Spiegel, 16, 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takemura, A. (1985). A principal decomposition of Hotelling’s T1 statistic. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate analysis VI (pp. 538–597). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1980). We need both exploratory and confirmatory. The American Statistician, 34, 23–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Schoot, F., & Bechger, T. M. (2003). Balans van handschriftkwaliteit in het primair onderwijs: Uitkomsten van de peilingen in 1999 [National assessment of handwriting quality in primary education: Results from the assessment of 1999]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M. (2006). Discriminant analysis with common principal components. Biometrika, 94, 1018–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar