REFERENCES
- Baltes, P. B., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Kliegl, R. (1986). Reserve capacity of the elderly in aging-sensitive tasks of fluid intelligence: Replication and extension. Psychology and Aging, 1, 172–177.
- Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Casella, G., & Berger, J. (2002). Statistical inference. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.
- Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.
- Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Graham, J. W. (2003). Adding missing-data relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 80–100.
- Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–575.
- Horn, J. L. (1982). The aging of human abilities. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 847–870). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL8 user’s and reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
- Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Muthén, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81–117.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Raykov, T. (2001). Testing multivariable covariance structure and means hypotheses via structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 224–257.
- Raykov, T. (2004). Estimation of maximal reliability: A note on a covariance structure modeling approach. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57, 21–27.
- Raykov, T. (2012). Scale construction and development using structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling ( pp. 472–492). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2012). Evaluation of validity and reliability of hierarchical scales. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 495–508.
- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2014). Identifying useful auxiliary variables for incomplete data analyses: A note on a group difference examination approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 537–550.
- Raykov, T., & Shrout, P. (2002). Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 195–212.
- Raykov, T., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2011). Proportion general factor variance in a hierarchical multiple-component measuring instrument: A note on a confidence interval procedure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 64, 193–207.
- Savalei, V. (2010). Small sample statistics for incomplete nonnormal data: Extensions of complete data formulae and a Monte Carlo comparison. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 241–260.
- Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
- Zimmerman, D. W. (1975). Probability measures, Hilbert spaces, and the axioms of classical test theory. Psychometrika, 40, 221–232.