Model Selection in Finite Mixture Models: A k-Fold Cross-Validation Approach

REFERENCES

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., Graham, J. W., Long, J. D., & Hansen, W. B. (1994). Cross-validation of latent class models of early substance use onset. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 165–183. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2902_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R. A., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147–167. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1802_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, W. H., & Bronk, K. C. (2011). Conducting confirmatory latent class analysis using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 132–151. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.532732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2010). Nonlinear structured growth mixture models in Mplus and OpenMx. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 887–909. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.531230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallquist, M., & Wiley, J. (2014). Mplus Automation: Automating Mplus model estimation and interpretation. R package version 0.6-2. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MplusAutomation
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, J. M., Reise, S. P., & Kim, K. H. (2007). Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: A comparison of relative model fit statistics. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 202–226. doi:10.1080/10705510709336744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C.-L. (1990). The impact of model selection on inference in linear regression. The American Statistician, 44, 214–217. doi:10.2307/2685338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries, N. O. (2003). A note on “Testing the number of components in a normal mixture.” Biometrika, 90, 991–994. doi:10.1093/biomet/90.4.991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2002). Methodological advances in the analysis of individual growth with relevance to education policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 77, 189–215. doi:10.1207/S15327930PJE7704_9
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. T., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Campbell, I. (2016). Inference based on the best-fitting model can contribute to the replication crisis: Assessing model selection uncertainty using a bootstrap approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 479–490. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1141355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol 2, pp. 551–611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Basic concepts and procedures in single-and multiple-group latent class analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 57–88). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 369–377. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., Khoo, S. T., Francis, D., & Boscardin, C. K. (2003). Analysis of reading skills development from kindergarten through first grade: An application of growth mixture modeling to sequential processes. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 71–89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463–469. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00463.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2014). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., Hunter, M. D., Pritikin, J. N., Zahery, M., Brick, T. R., Kickpatrick, R. M., … Boker, S. M. (2016). OpenMx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81, 535–549. doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., Morrison, F., & Eccrn, N. I. C. H. D. (2008). Classroom effects on children’s achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 365–397. doi:10.3102/0002831207308230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, N., & Grimm, K. J. (2009). Methods and measures: Growth mixture modeling. A method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 565–576. doi:10.1177/0165025409343765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343. doi:10.1007/BF02294360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2007). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317–341). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307–333. doi:10.2307/1912557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar