Two-Step Approach to Partial Factorial Invariance: Selecting a Reference Variable and Identifying the Source of Noninvariance

REFERENCES

• Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2011). A direct comparison method for testing measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 167–198. doi:10.1177/1094428111421987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1–27. doi:10.1177/014920639902500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2008). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: Locating the invariant referent sets. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 96–113. doi:10.1080/10705510701758349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144. doi:10.1080/03610739208253916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. C., Meade, A. W., & DuVernet, A. M. (2009). The role of referent indicators in tests of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 642–657. doi:10.1080/10705510903206014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, E., & Yoon, M. (2016). Comparisons of three empirical methods for partial factorial invariance: Forward, backward, and factor-ratio tests. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. S., & Yoon, M. (2011). Testing measurement invariance: A comparison of multiple-group categorical CFA and IRT. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 212–228. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.557337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Power and precision in confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 611–635. doi:10.1080/10705510701575461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., & Wright, N. A. (2012). Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1016–1031. doi:10.1037/a0027934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E., & Olivera-Aguilar, M. (2012). Investigating measurement invariance using confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 380–392). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., & Li, C. (2012). Measurement invariance for latent constructs in multiple populations: A critical view and refocus. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 954–974. doi:10.1177/0013164412441607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2013). Factorial invariance in multiple populations: A multiple testing procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 713–727. doi:10.1177/0013164412451978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensvold, R. B., & Cheung, G. W. (1998). Testing measurement models for factorial invariance: A systematic approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 1017–1034. doi:10.1177/0013164498058006010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 31–57. doi:10.1177/0013164413498257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, D. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347–363. doi:10.1177/0734282911406661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 210–222. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. doi:10.1086/209528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44. doi:10.1080/00220973.2010.531299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, T. A. (2013). The impact of noninvariant intercepts in latent means models. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 108–130. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.742397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, T. A., & Khojasteh, J. (2013). A comparison of methods to detect invariant reference indicators in structural equation modelling. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 1, 426–443. doi:10.1504/IJQRE.2013.058310
   Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, C. M. (2009). Empirical selection of anchors for tests of differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(1), 42–57. doi:10.1177/0146621607314044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, M., & Millsap, R. E. (2007). Detecting violations of factorial invariance using data-based specification searches: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 435–463. doi:10.1080/10705510701301677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar