References
- Altman, R. (2007). Mixed hidden Markov models: An extension of the hidden Markov model to the longitudinal data setting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 201–210.
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2008). Multilevel mixture models. In G. R. Hancock, & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models, (pp. 27–51). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis using Mplus: Technical implementation. Technical Report, Version 3. Retrieved from http://statmodel.com/download/Bayes3.pdf
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2011). Using Bayesian priors for more flexible latent class analysis. In Proceeedings of the Joint Statistical Meeting (pp. 4979–4993). Miami Beach, FL.
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2012). Multiple group multilevel analysis. Mplus Web Notes: No. 16. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén: Muthén.
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2016). General random effect latent variable modeling: Random subjects, items, contexts, and parameters. In Advances in multilevel Modeling for educational research: Addressing practical issues found in real-world applications. J. Harring, L. Stapleton, S. Beretvas (Eds.), (pp. 155–182). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Asparouhov, T., Hamaker E., & Muthén, B. (2016). Dynamic structural equation models. Technical Report. In preparation.
- Bauer, D., & Curran, P. (2003), Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363.
- Davidov, E., Dulmer, H., Schluter, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012), Using a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to explain cross-cultural measurement noninvariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 558–575.
- De Jong, M. G., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Fox, J.-P. (2007). Relaxing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research using a hierarchical IRT model. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 260–278.
- De Jong, M. G., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2009) Finite mixture multilevel multidimensional ordinal IRT Models for large scale cross-cultural research, psychometrika, 75, 3–32.
- Hamaker, E. L., & Grasman, R. P. (2012) Regime switching state-space models applied to psychological processes: Handling missing data and making inferences, Psychometrika, 77, 400–422.
- Hamaker, E. L., Grasman, R. P., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Modeling BAS dysregulation in bipolar disorder illustrating the potential of time series analysis. Assessment, 23, 436–446.
- Kim, C. & Nelson, C. (1999). State-space models with regime switching. cambridge, M-A: MIT Press.
- Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82, 35–45.
- Molenaar, P. C. M. (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 50, 181–202.
- Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201–218.
- Patterson, B., Dayton, M., and Graubard, B. (2002). Latent class analysis of complex sample survey data: Application to dietary data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 721–729.
- Trull, T., & Ebner-Priemer, U. (2014). The role of ambulatory assessment in psychological science, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 466–470.
- Zhang, Z., and Nesselroade, J. (2007). Bayesian estimation of categorical dynamic factor models, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 729–756.
- Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E., and Nesselroade, J. (2008). Comparisons of four methods for estimating a dynamic factor model, Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 377–402.