Performance of Nonrecursive Latent Variable Models under Misspecification

References

• Ahmed, S., & Mosley, H. W. (2002). Simultaneity in the use of maternal-child health care and contraceptives: Evidence from developing countries. Demography, 39(1), 75–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., & Leite, W. (2013). Use of Monte Carlo studies in structural equation modeling research. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 625–666). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78–117. doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Freeman, E. H. (1983). Tests for stability in linear structural equation systems. Psychometrika, 48, 143–145. doi:10.1007/BF02314682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1996). An alternative Two-Stage Least Squares estimator for latent variable equations. Psychometrika, 61, 109–121. doi:10.1007/BF02296961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Bauer, D. J. (2004). Automating the selection of model-implied instrumental variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 30, 425–452. doi:10.1177/0049124103260341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J. A., Curran, P. J., & Paxton, P. M. (2007). Latent variable models under misspecification: Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimators. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(1), 48–86. doi:10.1177/0049124107301947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2001). Two- Stage Least Squares and latent variable models: Simultaneous estimation and robustness to misspecifications. In R. Cudeck, S. DuToit, & D. Sörbom (Ed.), Structural equation modeling present and future. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Boomsma, A. (1983). On the robustness of LISREL against small sample size and non-normality. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Sociometric Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-T., Chi, N.-W., & Miao, M.-C. (2007). Testing the relationship between three-component organizational/occupational commitment and organizational/occupational turnover intention using a non-recursive model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 352–368. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. S. E., & Hedge, A. (2012, October). A LISREL analysis of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in office workers. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting (pp. 1283–1287). Boston, MA: HFES.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J. (1994). The robustness of confirmatory factor analysis to model misspecification and violations of normality. Retrieved from University Microfilms International, Order Number 9422143.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, C., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). The effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation model fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 119–144. doi:10.1080/10705519509540000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 1–16. doi:10.1086/224256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D. (1969). Contingencies in constructing causal models. Sociological Methodology, 1, 74–112. doi:10.2307/270881
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to structural equation models. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, W. H., & French, B. F. (2015). Modeling of nonrecursive structural equation models with categorical indicators. Structural Equation Modeling, 22(3), 416–428. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.937380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., & Rubin, D. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hägglund, G. (1982). Factor analysis by instrumental variable methods. Psychometrika, 47, 209–222. doi:10.1007/BF02296276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. (1983). Specification and estimation of simultaneous equation models. In Z. Griliches & M. D. Intriligator (Ed.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 1, pp. 391–448). New York, NY: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, D. R. (1975). Causal analysis. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, P. D. (2009). A first course in Bayesian statistical methods. Springer Texts in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness in covariance structure modeling: An overview and meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26, 329–367. doi:10.1177/0049124198026003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. J. (1983). Factor analysis as an error-in-variables model. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.), Principles of modern psychological measurement (pp. 185–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. J., & Sörbom, D. (2017). LISREL version 9.3 [Computer program]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. J., Sörbom, D., Du Toit, S., & Du Toit, M. (1999). LISREL 8: New statistical features. Third printing with revisions. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (1988). The impact of specification error on the estimation, testing, and improvement of structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 69–86. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural Equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2010). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruske, J. K. (2011). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS. Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., Cornwell, J. M., & Mulaik, S. A. (1988). Limited information parameter estimates for latent or mixed manifest and latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 171–187. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2302_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. M., Grube, J. W., Madden, P. A., & Gover, J. (2003). Adolescent use and suicidal ideation: A nonrecursive model. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 705–724. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00270-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2011). Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus Version 8.0 [Computer program]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. M., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., & Kirby, J. (2001). Monte Carlo experiments: Design and implementation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(2), 287–312. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. M., Hipp, J. R., & Marquett-Pyratt, S. (2011). Nonrecursive models: Endogeneity, reciprocal relationships, and feedback loops. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Popli, G., Gladwell, D., & Tsuchiya, A. (2013). Estimating the critical and sensitive periods of investment in early childhood: A methodological note. Social Science & Medicine, 97, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, D. A., & Shafer, W. D. (2001). The power of the likelihood ratio chi-square test for structural equation models: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 105–132. doi:10.3102/10769986026001105
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J. (2006). Quantifying parsimony in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(3), 227–259. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L. R., Vargas, R. V., Behroozmand, R., Parkinson, A. L., Larson, C. R., Greenlee, J. D. W., & Robin, D. A. (2016). Dynamic connectivity mapping of electrocorticographic data using Bayesian differential structural equation modeling. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal, 4(4), 00102.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, H. (1971). Principles of econometrics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar