Better Confidence Intervals for RMSEA in Growth Models given Nonnormal Data

References

• Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction. Web note. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Astivia, O. L. O., & Zumbo, B. D. (2014). A cautionary note on the use of the Vale and Maurelli method to generate multivariate, nonnormal data for simulation purposes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 541–567. doi:10.1177/0013164414548894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Dijkstra, T. (1985). Efficient estimation via linearization in structural models. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate analysis VI (pp. 9–42). The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181–197. doi:10.1207/S15327906Mb340203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau-Liard, P. E., Savalei, V., & Li, L. (2012). An investigation of the sample performance of two nonnormality corrections for RMSEA. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 904–930. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, S., & Shapiro, A. (2009). Normal versus noncentral chi-square asymptotics of misspecified models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 803–827. doi:10.1080/00273170903352186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1992). Constructing a covariance matrix that yields a specified minimizer and a specified minimum discrepancy function value. Psychometrika, 57, 357–369. doi:10.1007/BF02295424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N., & Gronneberg, S. (2015). How general is the Vale–Maurelli simulation approach? Psychometrika, 80, 1018–1066. doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9414-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N., & Gronneberg, S. (2017). The asymptotic covariance matrix and its use in simulation studies. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 881–896. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1341320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N., & Olsson, U. H. (2015). Correcting too much or too little? The performance of three chi-square corrections. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 533–543. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1036964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N., & Olsson, U. H. (2016). A simple simulation technique for nonnormal data with prespecified skewness, kurtosis, and covariance matrix. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 207–219. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1133274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, R. M. (2003). Discrepancy risk model selection test theory for comparing possibly misspecified or nonnested models. Psychometrika, 68, 229–249. doi:10.1007/BF02294799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K. (2019a). Creating misspecified models in moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 84, 781–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K. (2019b). More robust standard error and confidence interval for SEM parameters given incorrect model and nonnormal data. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 260–279. doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1505522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 220–239. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E. L. (2004). Elements of large-sample theory. (corrected ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P., Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Generating nonnormal multivariate data using copulas: Applications to SEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 547–565. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.692629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, K. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). New ways to evaluate goodness of fit: A note on using equivalence testing to assess structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 148–153. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markland, D. (2005). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 851–858. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 391–410. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2017). Mplus 8 user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., & Breivik, E. (2004). Two equivalent discrepancy functions for maximum likelihood estimation: Do their test statistics follow a non-central chi-square distribution under model misspecification? Sociological Methods Research, 32, 453–500. doi:10.1177/0049124103258131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rencher, A. C., & Schaalje, G. B. (2008). Linear models in statistics (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A. (1989). Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach. Psychometrika, 54, 131–151. doi:10.1007/BF02294453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Savalei, V. (2018). On the computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the mean-and-variance corrected test statistic with nonnormal data in SEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 419–429. doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1455142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. (1983). Asymptotic distribution theory in the analysis of covariance structures (a unified approach). South African Statistical Journal, 17, 33–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (2016). Notes on the Steiger-Lind (1980) handout. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 777–781. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1217487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. M. (1985). On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50, 253–264. doi:10.1007/BF02294104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale, C., & Maurelli, V. (1983). Simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions. Psychometrika, 48, 465–471. doi:10.1007/BF02293687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. (2017). Approximations to the distribution of a test statistic in covariance structure analysis: A comprehensive study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 71, 334–362. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Lin, J. (2016). A scaled F distribution as approximation to the distribution of test statistic in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 409–421. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1057733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H. (2008). Noncentral chi-square versus normal distributions in describing the likelihood ratio statistic: The univariate case and its multivariate implication. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 109–136. doi:10.1080/00273170701836729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). On normal theory and associated test statistics in covariance structure analysis under two classes of nonnormal distributions. Statistica Sinica, 9, 831–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., Hayashi, K., & Bentler, P. M. (2007). Normal theory likelihood ratio statistic for mean and covariance structure analysis under alternative hypotheses. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 98, 1262–1282. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2006.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2007). Robust procedures in structural equation modeling. In S.-Y. Lee (Ed.), Handbook of latent variable and related models (pp. 367–397). The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modeling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 289–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2006). Mean comparison: Manifest variable versus latent variable. Psychometrika, 71, 139–159. doi:10.1007/s11336-004-1181-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2016). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 319–330. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1065414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar