Performance of Estimators for Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables with Missing Data

References

• Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arminger, G., & Sobel, M. E. (1990). Pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation of mean and covariance structures with missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 195–203. doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10475326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007, August). Computationally efficient estimation of multilevel high-dimensional latent variable models. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meeting, Biometrics Section. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/p2t1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2010a, August). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data (Unpublished technical report). Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/GstrucMissingRevision.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2010b). Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus (Unpublished technical report). Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/BayesAdvantages18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barendse, M. T., Oort, F. J., & Timmerman, M. E. (2015). Using exploratory factor analysis to determine the dimensionality of discrete responses. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 87–101. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.934850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R., & Muraki, E. (1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 261–280. doi:10.1177/014662168801200305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C., Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMars, C. E. (2012). A comparison of limited-information and full-information methods in Mplus for estimating item response theory parameters for nonnormal populations. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 610–632. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.713272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 119–143. doi:10.1080/10705519509540000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2001). The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 352–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J. F., West, S. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1997). Effects of sample size and non-normality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 87–107. doi:10.1080/10705519709540063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Forero, C. G., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2009). Estimation of IRT graded response models: Limited versus full information methods. Psychological Methods, 14, 275–299. doi:10.1037/a0015825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1985). The effects of sampling error and model characteristics on parameter estimation for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 255–271. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamata, A., & Bauer, D. J. (2008). A note on the relation between factor analytic and item response theory models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 136–153. doi:10.1080/10705510701758406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, P.-W. (2009). Evaluating estimation methods for ordinal data in structural equation modeling. Quality and Quantity, 43, 495–507. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9133-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, P.-W., & Wu, Q. (2012). Estimating in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 164–180). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavioral Research Methods, 48, 936–949. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Statistical analysis with missing data (Vol. 333). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Jorgensen, T. D., Lang, K. M., & Moore, E. W. (2013). On the joys of missing data. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 151–162. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jst048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment (pp. 150–160). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P., & Ahlawat, K. S. (1974). Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 82–99. doi:10.1111/bmsp.1974.27.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J. (1986). Recent developments in the factor analysis of categorical variables. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 3–31. doi:10.3102/10769986011001003
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115–132. doi:10.1007/BF02294210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1998–2004). Mplus technical appendices. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2002a). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus web notes: No. 4 Version 5, December 9, 2002. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnote.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2002b). Using Mplus Monte Carlo simulations in practice: A note on non-normal missing data in latent variable models. Mplus web notes: No. 2 Version 2, March 22, 2002. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnote.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., Du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes (Unpublished technical report). Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/Article_075.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431–462. doi:10.1007/BF02294365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Technical aspects of Muthén’s LISCOMP approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model. Psychometrika, 60, 489–503. doi:10.1007/BF02294325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raghunathan, T. E. (2004). What do we do with missing data? Some options for analysis of incomplete data. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 99–117. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.102802.124410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. doi:10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592. doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores (Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17). Richmond, VA: Psychometric Society.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang-Wallentin, F., Jöreskog, K. G., & Luo, H. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with misspecified models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 392–423. doi:10.1080/10705511.2010.489003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood‐based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165–200. doi:10.1111/0081-1750.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar