Latent Interaction Modeling with Planned Missing Data Designs

References

• Algina, J., & Moulder, B. C. (2001). A note on estimating the Jöreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 40–52. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0801_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Schulenber, J. E. (2011). The monitoring the future project after thirty-seven years: Design and procedures. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cham, H., Reshetnyak, E., Rosenfeld, B., & Breitbart, W. (2017). Full information maximum likelihood estimation for latent variable interactions with incomplete indicators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 12–30. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1245600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cham, H., West, S. G., Ma, Y., & Aiken, L. S. (2012). Estimating latent variable interactions with non-normal observed data: A comparison of four approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 840–876. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.732901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression and correlation for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitruk, P., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Kelava, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Challenges in nonlinear structural equation modeling. Methodology, 3, 100–114. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.3.3.100
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2001a). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128–141. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0801_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. (2001). The relativepPerformance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., Baraldi, A. N., & Cham, H. (2014). Estimating interaction effects with incomplete predictor variables. Psychological Methods March 2014, 19, 39–55. doi:10.1037/a0035314
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman, A. I. (1978). A method for simulating non-normal distributions. Psychometrika, 43, 521–532. doi:10.1007/BF02293811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzach, Y. (1997). Misleading interaction and curvilinear terms. Psychological Methods, 2, 235–247. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1996). Maximizing the usefulness of data obtained with planned missing value patterns: An application of maximum likelihood procedures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 197–218. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3102_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213. doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., Taylor, B. J., Olchowski, A. E., & Cumsille, P. E. (2006). Planned missing data designs in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 11, 323–343. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallquist, M. N., & Wiley, J. F. (2018). MplusAutomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 621–638. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1402334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, O., Stratton, J., & Aseltine, R. (2015). Designed missingness to better estimate efficacy of behavioral studies-application to suicide prevention trials. Journal of Medical Statistics and Informatics, 3, 2. doi:10.7243/2053-7662-3-2
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, M. M., Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Vanschyndel, S. K., Spinrad, T. L., Silva, K. M., … Southworth, J. (2016). Emotional expression in school context, social relationships, and academic adjustment in kindergarten. Emotion, 16, 553–566. doi:10.1037/emo0000147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 329–367. doi:10.1177/0049124198026003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, F., Moore, E. W. G., Kinai, R., & Crowe, K. S., Schoemann, a. M., & Little, T. D. (2014). Planned missing data designs with small sample sizes: How small is too small? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(5),435–452. doi:10.1177/0165025414531095
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 57–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kelava, A., Moosbrugger, H., Dimitruk, P., & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2008). Multicollinearity and missing constraints: A comparison of three approaches for the analysis of latent nonlinear effects. Methodology, 4, 51–66. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.51
   Google Scholar
• Kelava, A., Werner, C. S., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Zapf, D., Ma, Y., … West, S. G. (2011). Advanced nonlinear latent variable modeling: Distribution analytic LMS and QML estimators of interaction and quadratic effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 465–491. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.582408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. G., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474. doi:10.1007/BF02296338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 647–673. doi:10.1080/00273170701710205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, E., Brown, E., & Haneuse, S. J.-P. A. (2009a). On the assessment of Monte Carlo error in simulation-based statistical analyses. The American Statistician, 63, 155–162. doi:10.1198/tast.2009.0030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, E., Brown, E., & Haneuse, S. J.-P. A. (2009b). On the assessment of Monte Carlo error in simulation-based statistical analyses. The American Statistician, 63, 155–162. doi:10.1198/tast.2009.0030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, O.-M., Im, M., Hughes, J. N., Wehrly, S. E., & West, S. G. (2016). Testing statistical moderation in research on home-school partnerships: Establishing the boundary condition. In S. M. Sheridan & E. M. Kim (Eds.), Family-school partnerships in context (pp. 79–107). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19228-4.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, G.-C., Wen, Z., Marsh, H., & Lin, H.-S. (2010). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Clarification of orthogonalizing and double-mean-centering strategies. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 374–391. doi:10.1080/10705511.2010.488999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Nagengast, B., & Hau, K.-T. (2012). Structural equation models of latent interaction. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 436–458). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masland, L. C., & Lease, A. M. (2016). Characteristics of academically-influential children: Achievement motivation and social status. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 195–215. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9314-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Kelava, A., & Klein, A. G. (2006). Testing multiple nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling: A comparison of alternative estimation. In T. Teo & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research: Concepts and Applications (pp. 103–136). Rotterdamn, NL: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431–462. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-555-8_27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Planned missing data designs in educational psychology research. Educational Psychologist, 51, 305–316. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1208094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., & Little, T. D. (2012). Planned missing data designs for research in cognitive development. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13, 425–438. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.717340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Savalei, V., & Little, T. D. (2016). On the asymptotic relative efficiency of planned missingness designs. Psychometrika, 81, 60–89. doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9422-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, N., & Vorst, H. C. M. (2007). Reducing the length of questionnaires through structurally incomplete designs: An illustration. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, C. D., & Maurelli, V. A. (1983). Simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions. Psychometrika, 48(3), 465–471. doi:10.1007/BF02293687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar