A Corrected Goodness-of-Fit Index (CGFI) for Model Evaluation in Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–173. doi:10.1007/BF02294170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Stine, R. A., Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness-of-Fit Measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 205–229. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone, P. F., Sharma, S., & Shimp, T. A. (1989). A bootstrap procedure for evaluating goodness-of-fit indices of structural equation and confirmatory factor models. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 105–111. doi:10.1177/002224378902600109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in lisrel maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50, 229–242. doi:10.1007/BF02294248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. J., Brawer, P. A., & Vowles, K. E. (2006). The fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: Validation and age analysis using structural equation modeling. Pain, 121, 195–206. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 119–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Fan, X. (2005). TEACHER’S CORNER: Using SAS for Monte Carlo SIMULATION RESEARch in SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 299–333. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1202_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343–367. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56–83. doi:10.1080/10705519909540119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Wang, L. (1998). Effects of potential confounding factors on fit indices and parameter estimates for true and misspecified SEM models. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 58, 701–735. doi:10.1177/0013164498058005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1987). Improper solutions in the analysis of covariance structures: Their interpretability and a comparison of alternate respecifications. Psychometrika, 52, 99–111. doi:10.1007/BF02293958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1992). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 132–160. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Higgins, G. E. (2003). A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory using structural equation modeling. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 30, 441–458. doi:10.1177/0093854803253135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goubert, L., Crombez, G., & Van Damme, S. (2004). The role of neuroticism, pain catastrophizing and pain-related fear in vigilance to pain: A structural equations approach. Pain, 107, 234–241. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal on Business Research Methods, 6, 141–146.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modelling: Sensitivityto underparameterization model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. National Educational Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1982). Recent developments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 404–416. doi:10.1177/002224378201900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI user’s guide (3rd ed.). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F., & Dickman, K. (1962). Sample and population score matrices and sample correlation ma- trices from an arbitrary population correlation matrix. Psychometrika, 27, 179–182. doi:10.1007/BF02289635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. (2011). Do homes that are more energy efficient consume less energy?: A structural equation model of the English residential sector. Energy, 36, 5610–5620. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333–351. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. (2008). Analysis of structural equation model for the student pleasure travel market: Motivation, involvement, satisfaction, and destination loyalty. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 24, 297–313. doi:10.1080/10548400802156802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, D. W., & Stewart, W. P. (2002). A structural equation model of residents’ attitudes for tourism development. Tourism Management, 23, 521–530. doi:10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00006-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolenikov, S., & Bollen, K. A. (2012). Testing negative error variances: Is a Heywood case a symptom of misspecification?. Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 124–167. doi:10.1177/0049124112442138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Du, T. J., & Tanaka, J. S. (1989). Influence of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 625–635. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, M., & Lomax, R. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 1–27. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Balla, J. (1994). Goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis: The effects of sample size and model parsimony. Quality & Quantity, 28, 185–217. doi:10.1007/BF01102761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-Fit Indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430–445. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38, 467–479. doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindskof, D. (1984). Structural equation models: Empirical identification, heywood cases, and related problems. Sociological Methods & Research, 13, 109–119. doi:10.1177/0049124184013001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Sörbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 17, 105–129. doi:10.2307/271030
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B. (2008). Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 4, 83–97. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevlin, M., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivo, S. A., Fan, X., Witta, E. L., & Willse, J. T. (2006). The search for “optimal” cutoff properties: Fit index criteria in structural equation modeling. Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 267–288. doi:10.3200/JEXE.74.3.267-288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sugawara, H. M., & Maccallum, R. C. (1993). Effect of estimation method on incremental fit indexes for covariance structure models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 365–377. doi:10.1177/014662169301700405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure under arbitrary GLS estimation. Journal of British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology, 38, 197–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., Peacock, A. C., & Jackson, D. N. (1982). A comparison of component and factor patterns: A Monte Carlo approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 371–388. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Fan, X., & Willson, V. L. (1996). Effects of nonnormal data on parameter estimates and fit indices for a model with latent and manifest variables: An empirical study. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 228–247. doi:10.1080/10705519609540042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. H., Wang, S. C., & Lin, L. M. (2007). Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 66–77. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y., & Uysal, M. (2005). An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: A structural model. Tourism Management, 26, 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2015). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., Yang, M., & Jiang, G. (2017). Empirically corrected rescaled statistics for sem with small n and large p. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 1–26. doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1354759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar