Relaxing the Proportionality Assumption in Latent Basis Models for Nonlinear Growth

References

• Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 359–388. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blozis, S. A., & Cudeck, R. (1999). Conditionally linear mixed-effects models with latent variable covariates. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 245–270. doi:10.3102/10769986024003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blozis, S. A., & Harring, J. R. (2016). On the estimation of nonlinear mixed-effects models and latent curve models for longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 904–920. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1190932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchinal, A. S., & Applebaum, M. I. (1991). Estimating individual development functions: Various methods and their assumptions. Child Development, 62, 23–43. doi:10.2307/1130702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, P., Gurrin, L., & Sly, P. (1998). Extending the simple linear regression model to account for correlated responses: An introduction to generalized estimating equations and multi‐level mixed modelling. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 1261–1291. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980615)17:11<>1.0.CO;2-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Harring, J. R. (2007). Analysis of nonlinear patterns of change with random coefficient models. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 615–637. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529–569. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Building path diagrams for multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 12, 283–297. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit, S. H., & Cudeck, R. (2009). Estimation of the nonlinear random coefficient model when some random effects are separable. Psychometrika, 74, 65–82. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9107-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., & Ram, N. (2009). Nonlinear growth models in M plus and SAS. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 676–701. doi:10.1080/10705510903206055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Hamagami, F. (2011). Nonlinear growth curves in developmental research. Child Development, 82, 1357–1371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01630.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Steele, J. S., Ram, N., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2013). Exploratory latent growth models in the structural equation modeling framework. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 568–591. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harring, J. R., & Blozis, S. A. (2016). A note on recurring misconceptions when fitting nonlinear mixed models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 805–817. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1239522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, N., Peralta, Y., & Bose, M. (2019). Piecewise random-effects modeling software programs. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 156–164. doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1516507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22. doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2016). On using Bayesian methods to address small sample problems. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 750–773. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1186549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2017). Challenging conventional wisdom for multivariate statistical models with small samples. Review of Educational Research, 87, 1117–1151. doi:10.3102/0034654317727727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., & Matta, T. (2018). Differentiating between mixed-effects and latent-curve approaches to growth modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1398–1414. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0976-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. D., & West, S. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5, 23–43. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.5.1.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122. doi:10.1007/BF02294746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335. doi:10.1037/a0026802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogosa, D. R., & Willett, J. B. (1985). Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika, 50, 203–228. doi:10.1007/BF02294247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterba, S. K. (2014). Fitting nonlinear latent growth curve models with individually varying time points. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 630–647. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.919828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., … Matzke, D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 35–57. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363–381. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P. K., Steinley, D., & Jackson, K. M. (2015). Right-sizing statistical models for longitudinal data. Psychological Methods, 20, 470–488. doi:10.1037/met0000037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W., & Lang, K. M. (2016). Proportionality assumption in latent basis curve models: A cautionary note. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 140–154. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.938578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar