Choosing Priors in Bayesian Measurement Invariance Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study

References

• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010, September 29). Bayesian analysis using mplus: Technical implementation. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/BayesAdvantages18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2017). Prior-posterior predictive p-values. Mplus Web Notes: No. 22, Version 2. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/PPPP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Morin, A. J. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41, 1561–1577. doi:10.1177/0149206315591075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., & Sun, D. (2008). Objective priors for the bivariate normal model. The Annals of Statistics, 36, 963–982. doi:10.1214/07-AOS501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomsma, A. (2013). Reporting Monte Carlo studies in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 518–540. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.797839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousquet, N. (2008). Diagnostics of prior-data agreement in applied Bayesian analysis. Journal of Applied Statistics, 35, 1011–1029. doi:10.1080/02664760802192981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braeken, J., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Comparing future teachers’ beliefs across countries: approximate measurement invariance with Bayesian elastic constraints for local item dependence and differential item functioning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 733–749. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1161005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, M. K., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Fit for a Bayesian: An evaluation of PPP and DIC for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 39–50. doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1490648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., … Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76. doi:10.18637/jss.v076.i01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Algesheimer, R., & Schmidt, P. (2018). Testing for approximate measurement invariance of human values in the European social survey. Sociological Methods & Research, 47, 665–686. doi:10.1177/0049124117701478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Algesheimer, R., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). Comparing results of an exact vs. an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: A cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 982. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 25–75. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Meng, X.-L., & Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica, 6, 733–760. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24306036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013). Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 8–38. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Stern, H. S., Carlin, J. B., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, H., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Testing small variance priors using prior-posterior predictive p values. Psychological Methods, 23, 561–569. doi:10.1037/met0000131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofs, H., van de Schoot, R., Jansen, N. W., & Kant, I. (2018). Evaluating model fit in Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis with large samples: Simulation study introducing the BRMSEA. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78, 537–568. doi:10.1177/0013164417709314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R., Tierney, L., & Kadane, J. (1989). Approximate methods for assessing influence and sensitivity in Bayesian analysis. Biometrika, 76, 663–674. doi:10.1093/biomet/76.4.663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Wang, Y., & Nguyen, D. T. (2017). Measurement invariance testing with many groups: A comparison of five approaches. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 524–544. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1304822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and stan (2nd ed.). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y. (2007). Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lek, K., Oberski, D., Davidov, E., Cieciuch, J., Seddig, D., & Schmidt, P. (2019). Approximate measurement invariance. In T. P. Johnson, B. E. Pennell, I. A. L. Stoop, & B. Dorer (Eds.), Advances in comparative survey methods. Multinational, multiregional and multi-cultural contexts (pp. 911–929). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lek, K., & van de Schoot, R. (2019). How the choice of distance measure influences the detection of prior-data conflict. Entropy, 21, 446. doi:10.3390/e21050446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle, E. C., & Rosseel, Y. (2018). Blavaan: Bayesian structural equation models via parameter expansion. Journal of Statistical Software, 85, 1–30. doi:10.18637/jss.v085.i04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, T. P., White, I. R., & Crowther, M. J. (2019). Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine, 38, 2074–2102. doi:10.1002/sim.8086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335. doi:10.1037/a0026802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). New methods for the study of measurement invariance with many groups. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/PolAn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2014). IRT studies of many groups: The alignment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 978. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2019). Mplus [computer program]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, J., & O’Hagan, A. (2004). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: A Bayesian approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 66, 751–769. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.05304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, M. (2015). JAGS version 4.0.0 user manual. Retrieved from https://sourceforge.net/projects/mcmc-jags/files/Manuals/
   Google Scholar
• Pokropek, A., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2019). Assessing measurement invariance using traditional and newer approaches: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural equation modeling. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293.
   Google Scholar
• Seddig, D., & Leitgoeb, H. (2018). Exact and Bayesian approximate measurement invariance. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, J. Billiet, & B. Meuleman (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (2nd ed.). (pp. 553–579). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. doi:10.1007/S11336-008-9101-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64, 583–639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steck, H., & Jaakkola, T. S. (2003). On the dirichlet prior and Bayesian regularization. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obermayer (Eds.), NIPS’02 Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 713–720). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90. doi:10.1086/209528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromeyer, W. R., Miller, J. W., Sriramachandramurthy, R., & DeMartino, R. (2015). The prowess and pitfalls of Bayesian structural equation modeling: Important considerations for management research. Journal of Management, 41, 491–520. doi:10.1177/0149206314551962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, L., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthen, B. (2013). Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: A comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 770. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Mulder, J., Hoijtink, H., Van Aken, M. A., Semon Dubas, J., Orobio de Castro, B., … Romeijn, J.-W. (2011). An introduction to Bayesian model selection for evaluating informative hypotheses. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 713–729. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.621799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Winter, S. D., Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & Depaoli, S. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22, 217–239. doi:10.1037/met0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Erp, S., Mulder, J., & Oberski, D. L. (2018). Prior sensitivity analysis in default Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 23, 363–388. doi:10.1037/met0000162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Erp, S., Oberski, D. L., & Mulder, J. (2019). Shrinkage priors for Bayesian penalized regression. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 89, 31–50. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2018.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., & Gabry, J. (2017). Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing, 27, 1413–1432. doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, B. A., & Moore, J. L. (2005). The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography, 28, 815–829. doi:10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. (1996). An approach to Bayesian sensitivity analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 58, 739–750. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2346111
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R., & Cook, R. (1992). A graphical case statistics for assessing posterior influence. Biometrika, 79, 51–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/79.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zercher, F., Schmidt, P., Cieciuch, J., & Davidov, E. (2015). The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European social survey: Exact vs. approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 733. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., Peeters, M., Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Where do priors come from? Applying guidelines to construct informative priors in small sample research. Research in Human Development, 14, 305–320. doi:10.1080/15427609.2017.1370966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar