References
- Adolf, J., Schuurman, N. K., Borkenau, P., Borsboom, D., & Dolan, C. V. (2014). Measurement invariance within and between individuals: A distinct problem in testing the equivalence of intra- and inter-individual model structures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00883
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). General random effect latent variable modeling: Random subjects, items, contexts, and parameters. In J. R. Harring, L. M. Stapleton, & S. N. Beretvas (Eds.), Advances in multilevel modeling for educational research (pp. 163–192). Information Age Publishing.
- Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Dynamic latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1253479
- Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 359–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803
- Baraldi, A. N., Wurpts, I. C., MacKinnon, D. P., & Lockhart, G. (2015). Evaluating mechanisms of behavior change to inform and evaluate technology-based interventions. In L. Marsch, S. Lord, & J. Dallery (Eds.), Behavioral healthcare and technology: Using science-based innovations to transform practice (pp. 187–199). Oxford University Press.
- Barker, K. M., Dunn, E. C., Richmond, T. K., Ahmed, S., Hawrilenko, M., & Evans, C. R. (2020). Cross-classified multilevel models (CCMM) in health research: A systematic review of published empirical studies and recommendations for best practices. SSM-Population Health, 12, 100661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100661
- Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Litt, M. D. (2012). Measurement reactivity in diary research. In M. R. Mehl & T. Connor (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 108–123). Guilford Press.
- Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2015). The discrepancy between measurement and modeling in longitudinal data analysis. In J. R. Harring, L. M. Stapleton, & S. N. Beretvas (Eds.), Advances in multilevel modeling for educational research (pp. 3–38). Information Age Publishing.
- Boker, S. M., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T., Estabrook, R., Kenny, S., Bates, T., Mehta, P., Fox, J., & Fox, J. (2011). OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika, 76, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6
- Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
- Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
- Borsboom, D., & Dolan, C. V. (2007). Commentary: Theoretical equivalence, measurement invariance, and the idiographic filter. Measurement, 5, 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366360701765020
- Box, G., & Jenkins, G. (1970). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day.
- Braun, H. I., & Mislevy, R. (2005). Intuitive test theory. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508600705
- Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1390675
- Carey, K. B., Neal, D. J., & Collins, S. E. (2004). A psychometric analysis of the self-regulation questionnaire. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.001
- Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146
- Conner, T. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Trends in ambulatory self-report: The role of momentary experience in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182546f18
- Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248371003699969
- Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.107
- de Haan-Rietdijk, S., Voelkle, M. C., Keijsers, L., & Hamaker, E. L. (2017). Discrete- vs. Continuous-time modeling of unequally spaced experience sampling method data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01849
- de Jong, M. G., Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Fox, J. P. (2007). Relaxing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research using a hierarchical IRT model. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1086/518532
- Driver, C. C., Oud, J. H. L., & Voelkle, M. C. (2017). Continuous time structural equation modeling with R package ctsem. Journal of Statistical Software, 77(5), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i05
- Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290
- Dunn, E. C., Richmond, T. K., Milliren, C. E., & Subramanian, S. V. (2015). Using cross-classified multilevel models to disentangle school and neighborhood effects: An example focusing on smoking behaviors among adolescents in the United States. Health & Place, 31, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.12.001
- Edwards, M. C., & Wirth, R. J. (2009). Measurement and the study of change. Research in Human Development, 6, 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911163
- Eisenberg, I., Bissett, P., Enkai, A. Z., Li, J., MacKinnon, D. P., Marsch, L., & Poldrack, R. (2019). Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery. Nature Communications, 10, 2319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1
- Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Canning, J. R., Dallery, J., Enkavi, A. Z., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Gonzalez, O., Green, A. I., Greene, M. A., Kiernan, M., Kim, S. J., Li, J., Lowe, M. R., Mazza, G. L., Metcalf, S. A., Onken, L., Parikh, S. S., Peters, E., Prochaska, J. J., … Poldrack, R. A. (2018). Applying novel technologies and methods to inform the ontology of self-regulation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 101, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.014
- Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Pawlik, K., & Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory Assessment – Monitoring behavior in daily life settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206
- Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: Correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.531
- Fried, E. I., & Nesse, R. M. (2015). Depression sum-scores don’t add up: Why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential. BMC Medicine, 13, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0325-4
- Fried, E. I., van Borkulo, C. D., Epskamp, S., Schoevers, R. A., Tuerlinckx, F., & Borsboom, D. (2016). Measuring depression over time … or not? Lack of unidimensionality and longitudinal measurement invariance in four common rating scales of depression. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1354. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000275
- Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. Neuro Image, 65, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026
- Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457–472.
- Goldstein, H. (1994). Multilevel cross-classified models. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003005
- Gorter, R., Fox, J. P., & Twisk, J. W. (2015). Why item response theory should be used for longitudinal questionnaire data analysis in medical research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0050-x
- Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Muthén, B. (2018). At the frontiers of modeling intensive longitudinal data: Dynamic structural equation models for the affective measurements from the COGITO study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 820–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1446819
- Hamaker, E. L., Ceulemans, E., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2015). Modeling affect dynamics: State of the art and future challenges. Emotion Review, 7, 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590619
- Hamaker, E. L., Dolan, C. V., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2003). ARMA-based SEM when the number of time points T exceeds the number of cases N: Raw data maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 352–379. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_2
- Hamaker, E. L., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2012). Regime switching state-space model applied to psychological processes: Handling missing data and making inferences. Psychometrika, 77, 400–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9254-8
- Hamaker, E. L., & Wichers, M. (2017). No time like the present: Discovering the hidden dynamics in intensive longitudinal data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416666518
- Hardt, K., Hecht, M., Oud, J. H., & Voelkle, M. C. (2019). Where have the persons gone? – An illustration of individual score methods in autoregressive panel models. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1517355
- Hedeker, D., Mermelstein, R. J., & Demirtas, H. (2008). An application of a mixed-effects location scale model for analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data. Biometrics, 64, 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00924.x
- Hussey, I., & Hughes, S. (2020). Hidden invalidity among 15 commonly used measures in social and personality psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3, 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919882903
- Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2013). A test for cluster bias: Detecting violations of measurement invariance across clusters in multilevel data. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.769392
- Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2014). Measurement bias in multilevel data. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.856694
- Kuhfeld and Soland. (2020). Avoiding bias from sum scores in growth estimates: An examination of IRT-based approaches to scoring longitudinal survey responses. Psychological Methods, advance online publication.
- Lang, J. W., Lievens, F., De Fruyt, F., Zettler, I., & Tackett, J. L. (2019). Assessing meaningful within-person variability in Likert-scale rated personality descriptions: An IRT tree approach. Psychological Assessment, 31, 474–487.
- Liu, S. (2017). Person-specific versus multilevel autoregressive models: Accuracy in parameter estimates at the population and individual levels. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 70, 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12096
- Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2008). The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods, 13, 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012869
- Luo, W., & Kwok, O. M. (2009). The impacts of ignoring a crossed factor in analyzing cross-classified data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 182–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794214
- Mazza, G. L., Smyth, H. L., Bissett, P. G., Canning, J. R., Eisenberg, I. W., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2021). Correlation database of 60 cross-disciplinary surveys and cognitive tasks assessing self regulation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1732994
- McNeish, D. (2019). Two-level dynamic structural equation models with small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 948–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1578657
- McNeish, D., & Hamaker, E. L. (2020). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus. Psychological Methods, 25, 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000250
- McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2020). Thinking twice about sum scores. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 2287–2305. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01398-0
- Mehl, M. R., & Conner, T. S. (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. Guilford Press.
- Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
- Meyers, J. L., & Beretvas, S. N. (2006). The impact of inappropriate modeling of cross-classified data structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_3
- Millsap, R. E. (2010). Testing measurement invariance using item response theory in longitudinal data: An introduction. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00109.x
- Moskowitz, D. S., & Young, S. N. (2006). Ecological momentary assessment: What it is and why it is a method of the future in clinical psychopharmacology. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 31, 13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1325062/
- Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2018). Recent methods for the study of measurement invariance with many groups: Alignment and random effects. Sociological Methods & Research, 47, 637–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117701488
- Neale, M. C., Lubke, G., Aggen, S. H., & Dolan, C. V. (2005). Problems with using sum scores for estimating variance components: Contamination and measurement noninvariance. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.8.6.553
- Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1999). Pooling lagged covariance structures based on short, multivariate time series for dynamic factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 223–250). Sage.
- Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49, 1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408
- Ou, L., Hunter, M., & Chow, S.-M. (2018). dynr:Dynamicmodeling in R. (R-package version 0.1.12–5). CRAN. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dynr
- Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017915
- Rasbash, J., & Goldstein, H. (1994). Efficient analysis of mixed hierarchical and cross-classified random structures using a multilevel model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986019004337
- Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
- Rutter, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (2000). Developmental psychopathology: Concepts and challenges. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 265–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400003023
- Schultzberg, M., & Muthén, B. (2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1392862
- Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promise and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023605205115
- Slof-Op’t Landt, M. C. T., van Furth, E. F., Rebollo-Mesa, I., Bartels, M., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Slagboom, P. E., Boomsma, D. I., Meulenbelt, I., & Dolan, C. V. (2009). Sex differences in sum scores may be hard to interpret: The importance of measurement invariance. Assessment, 16, 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191109344827
- Smyth, J. M., & Stone, A. A. (2003). Ecological momentary assessment research in behavioral medicine. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023657221954
- Stroe-Kunold, E., Gruber, A., Stadnytska, T., Werner, J., & Brosig, B. (2012). Cointegration methodology for psychological researchers: An introduction to the analysis of dynamic process systems. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 65, 511–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02033.x
- Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. (2014). The role of ambulatory assessment in psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 466–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414550706
- van de Schoot, R., Broere, J. J., Perryck, K. H., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & van Loey, N. E. (2015). Analyzing small data sets using Bayesian estimation: The case of posttraumatic stress symptoms following mechanical ventilation in burn survivors. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 6, 25216. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.25216
- Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
- Walls, T. A., & Schafer, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Models for intensive longitudinal data. Oxford University Press.
- Wang, L. P., Hamaker, E., & Bergeman, C. S. (2012). Investigating inter-individual differences in short-term intra-individual variability. Psychological Methods, 17, 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029317
- Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x