1,147
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Teacher’s Corner

A Guide to Detecting and Modeling Local Dependence in Latent Class Analysis Models

Pages 971-982 | Received 13 Oct 2021, Accepted 20 Jan 2022, Published online: 31 Mar 2022

References

  • Albert, P., & Dodd, L. (2004). A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard. Biometrics, 60, 427–435.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Using Bayesian priors for more flexible latent class analysis. In Joint statistical proceedings, government statistics section (pp. 4979–4993). American Statistical Association.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Residual associations in latent class and latent transition analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22, 169–177.
  • Barnard, J., McCulloch, R., & Meng, X. L. (2000). Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with applications to shrinkage. Statistica Sinica, 10, 1281–1311.
  • Becker, M. P. (1989). On the bivariate normal distribution and association models for ordinal categorical data. Statistics & Probability Letters, 8, 435–440.
  • Berzofsky, M. E., Biemer, P. P., & Kalsbeek, W. D. (2014). Local dependence in latent class analysis of rare and sensitive events. Sociological Methods & Research, 43, 137–170.
  • Biemer, P. P. (2011). Latent class analysis of survey error. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Depaoli, S., Rus, H. M., Clifton, J. P., van de Schoot, R., & Tiemensma, J. (2017). An introduction to Bayesian statistics in health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 11, 248–264.
  • Depaoli, S., Winter, D., & Visser, M. (2020). The importance of prior sensitivity analysis in Bayesian Statistics: Demonstrations using an interactive Shiny App. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 608045.
  • Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992a). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457–511.
  • Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992b). A single series from the Gibbs sampler provides a false sense of security. In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, & A. F. M. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4 (pp. 625–631). Oxford University Press.
  • Gelman, A., Meng, X., & Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica, 6, 733–807.
  • Goodman, L. A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215–231.
  • Henry, K. L., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Multilevel latent class analysis: An application of adolescent smoking typologies with individual and contextual predictors. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 193–215.
  • Lanza, S. T., & Rhoades, B. L. (2013). Latent class analysis: An alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 14, 157–168.
  • Lazarfield, P., & Henry, N. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Lee, J., Jung, K., & Park, J. (2020). Detecting conditional dependence using flexible Bayesian latent class analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1987.
  • Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press.
  • Moss, H. B., Chen, C. M., & Yi, H. Y. (2007). Subtypes of alcohol dependence in a nationally representative sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 91, 149–158.
  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569.
  • Nylund, K., Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2007). Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: What does latent class analysis say? Child Development, 78, 1706–1722.
  • Nylund-Gibson, K., & Masyn, K. E. (2016). Covariates and mixture modeling: Results of a simulation study exploring the impact of misspecified effects on class enumeration. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 782–797.
  • Oberski, D. (2016). Beyond the number of classes: Separating substantive from non-substantive dependence in latent class analysis. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 10, 171–182.
  • Oberski, D., Kollenburg, G., & Vermunt, J. (2013). A Monte Carlo evaluation of three methods to detect local dependence in binary data latent class models. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 7, 267–279.
  • Pepe, M. S., & Janes, H. (2007). Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance. Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 8, 474–484.
  • Rao, C. R. (1948). Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with applications to problems of estimation. In Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (Vol. 44, pp. 50–57). Cambridge University Press.
  • Sepúlveda, R., Vicente-Villardón, J. L., & Galindo, M. P. (2008). The Biplot as a diagnostic tool of local dependence in latent class models. A medical application. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 1855–1869.
  • Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54, 371–384.
  • Torrance-Rynard, V., & Walter, S. (1997). Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance. Statistics in Medicine, 16, 2157–2175.
  • Vacek, P. (1985). The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Biometrics, 41, 959–968.
  • van de Schoot, R., Kaplan, D., Denissen, J., Asendorpf, J. B., Neyer, F. J., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2014). A gentle introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Applications to developmental research. Child Development, 85, 842–860.
  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2021). Upgrade manual for latent GOLD basic, advanced, syntax, and choice version 6.0. Statistical Innovations Inc.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.