https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-5567
References
- Anderson, T. (1958). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Wiley.
- Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100, 603–617.
- Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 41–75.
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
- Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509–529.
- Graybill, F. A. (1983). Matrices with applications in statistics (2nd ed.). Wadsworth International Group.
- Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution. University of Chicago Press.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
- Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6–23.
- Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 220–239.
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.
- McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.
- Moshagen, M. (2012). The model size effect in SEM: Inflated goodness-of-fit statistics are due to the size of the covariance matrix. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19, 86–98.
- Niemand, T., & Mai, R. (2018). Flexible cutoff values for fit indices in the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 1148–1172.
- R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
- Raykov, T. (2005). Bias-corrected estimation of noncentrality parameters of covariance structure models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 120–129.
- Rigdon, E. E. (1998). The equal correlation baseline model for comparative fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 63–77.
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
- Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
- van Laar, S., & Braeken, J. (2021). Understanding the comparative fit index: It’s all about the base! Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 26, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.7275/23663996
- Widaman, K. F., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8, 16–37.
- Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165–200.