Hierarchical Covariance Estimation Approach to Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Becker, B. J. (1992, December). Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 341–362. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165128
   Google Scholar
• Betancourt, M. (2017, January). A conceptual introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. arXiv, arXiv:1701.02434.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1973, January). Generalized least squares estimators in the analysis of covariance structures. South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1973.tb00197.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014). Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0361-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015, January). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L., & Chan, W. (2005, March). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L., & Chan, W. (2009, January). A two-stage approach to synthesizing covariance matrices in meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 28–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802561295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. R., Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2006, September). Validation of software for Bayesian models using posterior quantiles. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15, 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X136976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Stober, C. P., Dana, J., & Rouder, J. N. (2018, November). Estimation accuracy in the psychological sciences. PLOS One, 13, e0207239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (1997, December). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.6.1246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlow, C. F., & Beretvas, S. N. (2005, June). Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data. Psychological Methods, 10, 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., & Nagar, D. K. (1999). Matrix variate distributions. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Social Science Program: Work Orientations 1989 (1992). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2018a, January). Accounting for missing correlation coefficients in fixed-effects MASEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1375886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2018b, August). Testing moderator hypotheses in meta-analytic structural equation modeling using subgroup analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1359–1373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1046-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2020). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Psychological Methods, 25, 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, Z., Zhang, Q., & Tong, X. (2019, May). Bayesian meta-analytic SEM: A one-stage approach to modeling between-studies heterogeneity in structural parameters. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1530059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoine, N. P. (2019). Moving beyond noninformative priors: Why and how to choose weakly informative priors in Bayesian analyses. Oikos, 128, 912–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, D., Kurowicka, D., & Joe, H. (2009, October). Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1989–2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2009.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2017). Assessing the size of model misfit in structural equation models. Psychometrika, 82, 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle, E. C., Fitzsimmons, E., Uanhoro, J., & Goodrich, B. (2021, November). Efficient Bayesian structural equation modeling in Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 100, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v100.i06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle, E. C., & Rosseel, Y. (2018, June). blavaan: Bayesian structural equation models via parameter expansion. Journal of Statistical Software, 85, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v085.i04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., Du Toit, S. H. C., Spisic, D. (1997, November). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/Article_075.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norton, S., Cosco, T., Doyle, F., Done, J., & Sacker, A. (2013, January). The hospital anxiety and depression scale: A meta confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 74, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogasawara, H. (2001, September). Standard errors of fit indices using residuals in structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 66, 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkin, I., & Finn, J. D. (1995). Correlations redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oort, F. J., & Jak, S. (2016). Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Research Synthesis Methods, 7, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, J. J. J., & Becker, P. J. (1984). On prior inverted Wishart distribution (Technical Report). Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Talts, S., Betancourt, M., Simpson, D., Vehtari, A., & Gelman, A. (2018, April). Validating Bayesian inference algorithms with simulation-based calibration. arXiv, arXiv:1804.06788.
   Google Scholar
• Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C. (2020). Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved R for assessing convergence of MCMC. Bayesian Analysis, 16, 667–718.
   Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., & Sawalani, G. M. (2011). On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. In Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (pp. 39–61). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. J., Polanin, J. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2016, June). Fitting meta-analytic structural equation models with complex datasets. Research Synthesis Methods, 7, 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Browne, M. W. (2015, September). Quantifying adventitious error in a covariance structure as a random effect. Psychometrika, 80, 571–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9451-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Kano, Y. (2018, December). Meta-analytical SEM: Equivalence between maximum likelihood and generalized least squares. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 43, 693–720. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998618787799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar