Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Tests in Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model: Implications for Small Samples

References

• Arruda, E. H., & Bentler, P. (2017). A regularized GLS for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1318392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. (2006). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). Autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models: A synthesis of two traditions. Sociological Methods & Research, 32(, 336–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1974). Generalized least squares estimators in the analysis of covariances. South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, R. A., Crisp, D. A., & Burns, R. B. (2020). Re-examining the reciprocal effects model of self-concept, self-efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the cross-lagged panel and random-intercept cross-lagged panel frameworks. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, E. C., & Lange, K. (2014). Stable estimation of a covariance matrix guided by nuclear norm penalties. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, (80), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2014.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherson, M. E., Smith, M. M., Hill, A. P., & Flett, G. L. (2022). Feelings of not mattering and depressive symptoms from a temporal perspective: a comparison of the cross-lagged panel model and random-intercept cross-lagged panel model. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40, 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211049686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayakawa, K. (2019). Corrected goodness-of-fit test in covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 24, 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalal, S., & Bentler, P. (2018). Using Monte Carlo normal distribution to evaluate structural models with nonnormal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25, 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongerling, J., & Hamaker, E. L. (2011). On the trajectories of the predetermined ALT model: What are we really modeling? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). Some contribution to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayakawa, K., & Sun, Q. (2022). Selection of loss function in covariance structure analysis: case of the spherical model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisplinary Journal, 29, 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.2003199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima, R., Shinohara, R., Akiyama, Y., Yokomichi, H., & Yamagata, Z. (2021). Temporal directional relationship between problematic internet use and depressive symptoms among Japanese adolescents: A random intercept, cross-lagged panel model. Addictive Behaviors, 120September, 106989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian Approach. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., & Jennrich, R. (1979). A study of algorithms for covariance structure analysis with specific comparisons using factor analysis. Psychometrika, 44, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, J. D., & Hamaker, E. (2021). Three extension of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mund, M., Johnson, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2021). Changes in size and interpretation of parameter estimates in within-person models in the presence of time-invariant and time-varying covariates. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666928
   Google Scholar
• Narmandakh, A., Roest, A. M., Jonge, P. D., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2020). The bidirectional association between sleep problems and anxiety symptoms in adolescents: A TRAILS report. Sleep Medicine, 67, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2019.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, J. M., Gray, S. A., Butterworth, B. L., & Reeve, R. A. (2019). Reading and math tests differentially predict number transcoding and number fact speed longitudinally: A random intercept cross-lagged panel approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, D., DiStefano, C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Lee, T. (2020). Evaluating SEM model fit with small degrees of freedom. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 57, 179–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, D., Lee, T., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019). Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 310–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, D., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2020). The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80, 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usami, S. (2021). On the differences between general cross-lagged panel model and random-intercept cross-lagged panel model: Interpretation of cross-lagged parameters and model choice. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1821690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usami, S., Hayes, T., & McArdle, J. J. (2016). Inferring longitudinal relationships between variables: Model selection between the latent change score and autoregressive cross-lagged factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1066680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usami, S., Murayama, K., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019). A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations. Psychological Methods, 24, 637–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, B. Q., & Bentler, P. M. (2022a). RGLS and RLS in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2117182
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, B. Q., & Bentler, P. M. (2022b). Testing mean and covariance structures with reweighted least squares. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1977649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar