260
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Effectiveness of the Deterministic and Stochastic Bivariate Latent Change Score Models for Longitudinal Research

Pages 618-632 | Received 10 Oct 2022, Accepted 20 Dec 2022, Published online: 24 Jan 2023

References

  • Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035692.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2020). Comparison of models for the analysis of intensive longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling, 27, 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1626733.
  • Bielak, A. A. M., Gerstorf, D., Kiely, K. M., Anstey, K. J., & Luszcz, M. (2011). Depressive symptoms predict decline in perceptual speed in older adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 26, 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023313.
  • Bodenmann, G., Hilpert, P., Nussbeck, F. W., & Bradbury, T. N. (2014). Enhancement of couples’ communication and dyadic coping by a self-directed approach: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036356.
  • Boker, S. M., Neale, M. C., Maes, H. H., Wilde, M. J., Spiegel, M., Brick, T. R., Estabrook, R., Bates, T. C., & Mehta, P. (2018). OpenMx user guide. Retrieved from https://openmx.ssri.psu.edu/documentation
  • Cáncer, P. F., Estrada, E., Ollero, M. J., & Ferrer, E. (2021). Dynamical properties and conceptual interpretation of latent change score models. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 696419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696419.
  • Estrada, E., Ferrer, E., Karama, S., Román, F. J., & Colom, R. (2019). Time-lagged associations between cognitive and cortical development from childhood to early adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 55, 1338–1352. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000716.
  • Ferrer, E., McArdle, J. J., Shaywitz, B. A., Holahan, J. M., Marchione, K., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2007). Longitudinal models of developmental dynamics between reading and cognition from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1460–1473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460
  • Ferrer, E., Shaywitz, B. A., Holahan, J. M., Marchione, K., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2010). Uncoupling of reading and IQ over time: Empirical evidence for a definition of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 21, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609354084.
  • Finkel, D., Ernsth-Bravell, M., & Pedersen, N. L. (2016). Temporal dynamics of motor functioning and cognitive aging. The Journals of Gerontology, 71, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glv110.
  • Finkel, D., Reynolds, C. A., Emery, C. F., & Pedersen, N. L. (2013). Genetic and environmental variation in lung function drives subsequent variation in aging of fluid intelligence. Behavior Genetics, 43, 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-013-9600-3
  • Gerstorf, D., Lövdén, M., Röcke, C., Smith, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2007). Well-being affects changes in perceptual speed in advanced old age: Longitudinal evidence for a dynamic link. Developmental Psychology, 43, 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.705.
  • Ghisletta, P., Bickel, J.-F., & Lovden, M. (2006). Does activity engagement protect against cognitive decline in old age? Methodological and analytical considerations. The Journals of Gerontology, 61, P253–P261.
  • Ghisletta, P., & Lindenberger, U. (2003). Age-based structural dynamics between perceptual speed and knowledge in the berlin aging study: Direct evidence for ability dedifferentiation in old age. Psychology and Aging, 18, 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.696.
  • Ghisletta, P., & McArdle, J. J. (2012). Latent curve models and latent change score models estimated in R. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 651–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.713275.
  • Grimm, K. J. (2007). Multivariate longitudinal methods for studying developmental relationships between depression and academic achievement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077754
  • Hamagami, F., & McArdle, J. J. (2001). Advanced studies of individual differences linear dynamic models for longitudinal data analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 203–246). Erlbaum Publishers.
  • Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., Hultsch, D. F., & MacDonald, S. W. S. (2003). Latent change models of adult cognition: Are changes in processing speed and working memory associated with changes in episodic memory? Psychology and Aging, 18, 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.755
  • Hunter, M. D. (2018). State space modeling in an open source, modular, structural equation modeling environment. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1369354.
  • Infurna, F. J., & Gerstorf, D. (2013). Linking perceived control, physical activity, and biological health to memory change. Psychology and Aging, 28, 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033327.
  • Ji, L., & Chow, S.-M. (2019). Methodological issues and extensions to the latent difference score framework 1. In E. Ferrer, S. M. Boker, & K. J. Grimm (Eds.), Longitudinal multivariate psychology (pp. 9–37). Routledge.
  • Kail, R. V., & Ferrer, E. (2007). Processing speed in childhood and adolescence: Longitudinal models for examining developmental change. Child Development, 78, 1760–1770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01088.x.
  • Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (2001). Trait–state models for longitudinal data. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 243–263). American Psychological Association.
  • Kievit, R. A., Brandmaier, A. M., Ziegler, G., van Harmelen, A.-L., de Mooij, S. M. M., Moutoussis, M., Goodyer, I. M., Bullmore, E., Jones, P. B., Fonagy, P., Lindenberger, U., & Dolan, R. J, NSPN Consortium (2018). Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.007.
  • King, L. A., King, D. W., McArdle, J. J., Saxe, G. N., Doron‐LaMarca, S., & Orazem, R. J. (2006). Latent difference score approach to longitudinal trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20188
  • Liao, J., Muniz-Terrera, G., Head, J., & Brunner, E. J. (2018). Dynamic longitudinal associations between social support and cognitive function: A prospective investigation of the directionality of associations. The Journals of Gerontology. 73, 1233–1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw135.
  • Lövdén, M., Ghisletta, P., & Lindenberger, U. (2005). Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age. Psychology and Aging, 20, 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.423.
  • Lövdén, M., Li, S.-C., Shing, Y. L., & Lindenberger, U. (2007). Within-person trial-to-trial variability precedes and predicts cognitive decline in old and very old age: Longitudinal data from the Berlin Aging Study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2827–2838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.005
  • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., & Wagner, J. (2018). More stable estimation of the STARTS model: A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Psychological Methods, 23, 570–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000155
  • Malone, P. S., Lansford, J. E., Castellino, D. R., Berlin, L. J., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (2004). Divorce and child behavior problems: Applying latent change score models to life event data. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_6
  • McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling, present and future: A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 7–46). Scientific Software International.
  • McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
  • McArdle, J. J., Ferrer-Caja, E., Hamagami, F., & Woodcock, R. W. (2002). Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Developmental Psychology, 38, 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.1.115.
  • McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2001). Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 139–175). American Psychological Association.
  • McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2004). Methods for dynamic change hypotheses. In K. van Montfort, J. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent (Vol. 19, pp. 295–335). Springer.
  • McArdle, J. J., Hamgami, F., Jones, K., Jolesz, F., Kikinis, R., Spiro, A., & Albert, M. S. (2004). Structural modeling of dynamic changes in memory and brain structure using longitudinal data from the normative aging study. The Journals of Gerontology, 59, P294–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.6.P294.
  • McArdle, J. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2014). Longitudinal data analysis using structural equation models. American Psychological Association.
  • McArdle, J. J., & Prindle, J. J. (2008). A latent change score analysis of a randomized clinical trial in reasoning training. Psychology and Aging, 23, 702–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014349.
  • Mistler, S., & Enders, C. (2012). Planned missing data designs for developmental research. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Developmental Research methods (pp. 742–754). The Guilford Press.
  • Neale, M. C., Hunter, M. D., Pritikin, J. N., Zahery, M., Brick, T. R., Kirkpatrick, R. M., Estabrook, R., Bates, T. C., Maes, H. H., & Boker, S. M. (2016). OpenMx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Delsing, M. J. M. H. (2010). Continuous time modeling of panel data by means of SEM. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal Research with Latent Variables (pp. 201–244). Springer.
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of sem. Psychometrika, 65, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294374.
  • Peng, P., & Kievit, R. A. (2020). The development of academic achievement and cognitive abilities: A bidirectional perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 14, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12352.
  • Quinn, J. M., Wagner, R. K., Petscher, Y., & Lopez, D. (2015). Developmental relations between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: A latent change score modeling study. Child Development, 86, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12292.
  • Rhemtulla, M., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Planned missing data designs in educational psychology research. Educational Psychologist, 51, 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1208094.
  • Sargent-Cox, K. A., Anstey, K. J., & Luszcz, M. A. (2012). The relationship between change in self-perceptions of aging and physical functioning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27, 750–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027578
  • Schmitt, S. A., Geldhof, G. J., Purpura, D. J., Duncan, R., & McClelland, M. M. (2017). Examining the relations between executive function, math, and literacy during the transition to kindergarten: A multi-analytic approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 1120–1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000193
  • Schuurman, N. K., Houtveen, J. H., & Hamaker, E. L. (2015). Incorporating measurement error in n = 1 psychological autoregressive modelling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01038.
  • Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Escobar, M. D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. JAMA, 264, 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450080084036.
  • Small, B. J., Dixon, R. A., McArdle, J. J., & Grimm, K. J. (2012). Do changes in lifestyle engagement moderate cognitive decline in normal aging? Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Neuropsychology, 26, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026579.
  • Snitz, B. E., Small, B. J., Wang, T., Chang, C.-C H., Hughes, T. F., & Ganguli, M. (2015). Do subjective memory complaints lead or follow objective cognitive change? A five-year population study of temporal influence. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 21, 732–742. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617715000922.
  • Usami, S., Hayes, T., & McArdle, J. J. (2015). On the mathematical relationship between latent change score and autoregressive cross-lagged factor approaches: Cautions for inferring causal relationship between variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1079696.
  • Usami, S., Hayes, T., & McArdle, J. J. (2016). Inferring longitudinal relationships between variables: Model selection between the latent change score and autoregressive cross-lagged factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1066680.
  • Usami, S., Murayama, K., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019). A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations. Psychological Methods, 24, 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000210.
  • van Der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842.
  • Voelkle, M. C., Gische, C., Driver, C. C., & Lindenberger, U. (2018). The role of time in the quest for understanding psychological mechanisms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 782–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1496813.
  • Voelkle, M. C., & Oud, J. H. L. (2015). Relating latent change score and continuous time models. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935918.
  • Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological methods, 17, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027543.
  • Ziegler, M., Cengia, A., Mussel, P., & Gerstorf, D. (2015). Openness as a buffer against cognitive decline: The Openness-Fluid-Crystallized-Intelligence (OFCI) model applied to late adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 30, 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039493.
  • Zyphur, M. J., Allison, P. D., Tay, L., Voelkle, M. C., Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L., Shamsollahi, A., Pierides, D. C., Koval, P., & Diener, E. (2020). From data to causes I: Building a general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM). Organizational Research Methods, 23, 651–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847278

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.