Illustrating the Value of Prior Predictive Checking for Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Alisic, E., Eland, J., & Kleber, R. (2006). Schokverwerkingslijst Voor Kinderen-Herziene Versie [Children’s Responses to Trauma Inventory-Revised Version]. Institute for Psychotrauma in Collaboration with Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betancourt, M. (2020, April). Towards a principled Bayesian workflow. https://betanalpha.github.io/assets/case_studies/principled_bayesian_workflow.html
   Google Scholar
• Blevins, C. A., Weathers, F. W., Davis, M. T., Witte, T. K., & Domino, J. L. (2015). The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28, 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/JTS.22059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovin, M. J., Marx, B. P., Weathers, F. W., Gallagher, M. W., Rodriguez, P., Schnurr, P. P., & Keane, T. M. (2016). Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – fifth edition (PCL-5) in veterans. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. (1980). Sampling and Bayes’ inference in scientific modelling and robustness. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-Series A (General), 143, 383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2982063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressler, R., Erford, B. T., & Dean, S. (2018). A systematic review of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL). Journal of Counseling & Development, 96, 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCAD.12190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P. C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. K., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Fit for a Bayesian: An evaluation of PPP and DIC for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1490648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S. (2012). Measurement and structural model class separation in mixture CFA: ML/EM versus MCMC. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 178–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.659614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S. (2013). Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: frequentist versus Bayesian estimation. Psychological Methods, 18, 186–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S. (2021). Bayesian structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Improving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist. Psychological Methods, 22, 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S., Winter, S. D., & Visser, M. (2020). The importance of prior sensitivity analysis in Bayesian statistics: Demonstrations using an interactive Shiny app. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 608045–608018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfadaly, F. G., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2017). Eliciting Dirichlet and Gaussian copula prior distributions for multinomial models. Statistics and Computing, 27, 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9632-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M., & Moshonov, H. (2006). Checking for prior-data conflict. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 893–914. http://genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/html/id.phtml?id=15995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garthwaite, P. H., Al-Awadhi, S. A., Elfadaly, F. G., & Jenkinson, D. J. (2013). Prior distribution elicitation for generalized linear and piecewise-linear models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 40, 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2012.734794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geier, T. J., Hunt, J. C., Nelson, L. D., Brasel, K. J., & deRoon-Cassini, T. A. (2019). Detecting PTSD in a traumatically injured population: The diagnostic utility of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 36, 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Simpson, D., & Betancourt, M. (2017). The prior can often only be understood in the context of the likelihood. Entropy, 19, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19100555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtmann, J., Koch, T., Lochner, K., & Eid, M. (2016). A comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian methods for multilevel structural equation models in small samples: A simulation study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1208074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, A., & Wand, M. P. (2013). Simple marginally noninformative prior distributions for covariance matrices. Bayesian Analysis, 8, 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-BA815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, H., Ertl, V., Catani, C., Ismail, A. A., & Neuner, F. (2018). The validity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as screening instrument with Kurdish and Arab displaced populations living in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. BMC Psychiatry, 18, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1839-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., Suh, Y., Kim, J. S., Albanese, M. A., & Langer, M. M. (2013). Single and multiple ability estimation in the SEM framework: A noninformative Bayesian estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.802647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Fourth ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142, 573–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029146
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (Second Ed.). Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Zhang, Z., & Grimm, K. J. (2016). Comparison of Inverse Wishart and separation-strategy priors for Bayesian estimation of covariance parameter matrix in growth curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1057285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle, E. C., Fitzsimmons, E., Uanhoro, J., & Goodrich, B. (2021). Efficient Bayesian structural equation modeling in Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 100, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/JSS.V100.I06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modrák, M. (2018, February). Taming divergences in Stan models. https://www.martinmodrak.cz/2018/02/19/taming-divergences-in-stan-models/
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. E., Oakley, J. E., & Crowe, J. A. (2014). A web-based tool for eliciting probability distributions from experts. Environmental Modelling and Software, 52, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., Ross, J., Ashwick, R., Armour, C., & Busuttil, W. (2017). Exploring optimum cut-off scores to screen for probable posttraumatic stress disorder within a sample of UK treatment-seeking veterans. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8, 1398001. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1398001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, A., Buck, C. E., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., Jenkinson, D. J., Oakley, J. E., & Rakow, T. (2006). Uncertain judgements: Eliciting experts’ probabilities. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, J. E. (2020). SHELF: R package (R package version 1.7.0). https://github.com/OakleyJ/SHELF
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, J. E., & O’Hagan, A. (2007). Uncertainty in prior elicitations: A nonparametric approach. Biometrika, 94, 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asm031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe-Sepowitz, D. E. (2009). Comparing male and female juveniles charged with homicide: Child maltreatment, substance abuse, and crime details. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw, P. J., & Molenberghs, G. (1994). The shape of correlation matrices. American Statistician, 48, 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1994.10476079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runge, A. K., Scherbaum, F., Curtis, A., & Riggelsen, C. (2013). An interactive tool for the elicitation of subjective probabilities in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103, 2862–2874. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, D. J., Betancourt, M., & Vasishth, S. (2021). Toward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive science. Psychological Methods, 26, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smid, S. C., McNeish, D. M., Miočević, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2019). Bayesian versus frequentist estimation for structural equation models in small sample contexts: A systematic review. Structural Equation Modeling, 27, 131–161 https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1577140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. (2020). RStan: The R interface to Stan. R package version 2.21.2. http://mc-stan.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Truong, P. N., Heuvelink, G. B. M., & Gosling, J. P. (2013). Web-based tool for expert elicitation of the variogram. Computers and Geosciences, 51, 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Review Methods Primers, 1, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2
   Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Winter, S. D., Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & Depaoli, S. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22, 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zundert, C., Somer, E., & Miočević, M. (2022). Prior predictive checks for the method of covariances in Bayesian nediation analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 29, 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1977648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen, D., Egberts, M. R., van Loey, N. E. E., & van de Schoot, R. (2020a). Expert elicitation for latent growth curve models: The case of posttraumatic stress symptoms development in children with burn Injuries. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen, D., Egberts, M., Van Loey, N., & van de Schoot, R. (2020b, May 6). Expert elicitation for latent growth curve models: The case of posttraumatic stress symptoms development in young burn victims. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y5EVF
   Google Scholar
• Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C. (2021). Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved R̂ for assessing convergence of MCMC (with discussion). Bayesian Analysis, 16, 667–718. https://doi.org/10.1214/20-BA1221
   Google Scholar
• Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Keane, T. M., Palmieri, P. A., Marx, B. P., & Schnurr, P. P. (2013). The PTSD Checklist for DSM–5 (PCL-5). National Center for PTSD.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. D., & Depaoli, S. (2022). Sensitivity of Bayesian model fit indices to the prior specification of latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling, 29, 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2032078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., Peeters, M., Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Where do priors come from? Applying guidelines to construct informative priors in small sample research. Research in Human Development ISSN, 14, 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2017.1370966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., van de Schoot-Hubeek, W., Lek, K., Hoijtink, H., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Application and evaluation of an expert judgment elicitation procedure for correlations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 90–115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar