The regDIF R Package: Evaluating Complex Sources of Measurement Bias Using Regularized Differential Item Functioning

References

• Bauer, D. J. (2017). A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 22, 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., Belzak, W. C. M., & Cole, V. T. (2020). Simplifying the assessment of measurement invariance over multiple background variables: Using regularized moderated nonlinear factor analysis to detect differential item functioning. Structural Equation Modeling, 27, 43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: Traditional and new models. Psychological Methods, 14, 101–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belzak, W. C. M. (2021). regDIF: Regularized differential item functioning. Duolingo. R, version 1.1.0.
   Google Scholar
• Belzak, W. C. M., & Bauer, D. J. (2020). Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 25, 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belzak, W. C. M., & Bauer, D. J. (under review) Using regularization to identify measurement bias across multiple background characteristics: A penalized expectation-maximization algorithm.
   Google Scholar
• Breheny, P., & Huang, J. (2011). Coordinate descent algorithms for nonconvex penalized regression, with applications to biological feature selection. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 5, 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-AOAS388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breheny, P., & Huang, J. (2015). Group descent algorithms for nonconvex penalized linear and logistic regression models with grouped predictors. Statistics and Computing, 25, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-013-9424-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardwell, R., LaFlair, G. T., & Settles, B. (2021). Duolingo English Test: Technical manual. Duolingo Research Report, 1–37. https://duolingo-papers.s3.amazonaws.com/other/det-technical-manual-current.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P., Counsell, A., & Flora, D. B. (2016). It might not make a big dif: Improved differential test functioning statistics that account for sampling variability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 114–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boeck, P., & Wilson, M. (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. Spring-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1986). Differential item functioning and the mantel-haenszel procedure. ETS Research Report Series, 1986, i–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2330-8516.1986.tb00186.x
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution. Supplementary Educational Monographs.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. (1977). A study of item bias, using item characteristic curve theory. In Y. H. Poortinga (Ed.), Basic problems in cross-cultural psychology. Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (2019). Generalized linear models. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, L., Van De Geer, S., & Bühlmann, P. (2008). The group lasso for logistic regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 70, 53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W., & Millsap, R. E. (1992). On the misuse of manifest variables in the detection of measurement bias. Psychometrika, 57, 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An r package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (beta). Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58, 267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C.-H. (2010). Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty. The Annals of Statistics, 38, 894–942. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOS729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67, 301–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar