A Model-Based Shrinkage Target to Avoid Non-convergence in Small Sample SEM

References

• Arruda, E. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2017). A regularized GLS for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 657–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K. H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906Mb340203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Arminger, G. (1995). Specification and estimation of mean- and covariance-structure models. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobbel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 311–359). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (2000). Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 108–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonckere, J., & Rosseel, Y. (2022). Using bounded estimation to avoid nonconvergence in small sample structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29, 412–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S. (2013). Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: Frequentist versus Bayesian estimation. Psychological Methods, 18, 186–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2008). The elements of statistical learning (2nd ed.). Springer New York Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobucci, R., Grimm, K. J., & McArdle, J. J. (2016). Regularized structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1154793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O. (1995). [Essays on risk and return in the stock market] [PhD thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management. Retrieved from http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/11875
   Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2003). Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10, 603–621.
   Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2004a). A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 88, 365–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-259X(03)00096-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2004b). Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix. Journal of Portfolio Management, 30, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2004.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., & Song, X.-Y. (2004). Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 653–686. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2004). Evaluating small sample approaches for model test statistics in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 439–478. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, J., & Strimmer, K. (2005). A shrinkage approach to large-scale covariance matrix estimation and implications for functional genomics. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 32. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smid, S. C., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). Sem with small samples: Two-step modeling and factor score regression versus Bayesian estimation with informative priors. In Small sample size solutions (pp. 239–254). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X.-Y., & Lee, S.-Y. (2012). Basic and advanced Bayesian structural equation modeling: With applications in the medical and behavioral sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ulitzsch, E., Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2021). Alleviating estimation problems in small sample structural equation modeling: A comparison of constrained maximum likelihood, Bayesian estimation, and fixed reliability approaches. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Winter, S., Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & Depaoli, S. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22, 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Erp, S., Mulder, J., & Oberski, D. L. (2018). Prior sensitivity analysis in default Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 23, 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2008). Structural equation modeling with near singular covariance matrices. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 4842–4858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2016). Structural equation modeling with unknown population distributions: Ridge generalized least squares. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 163–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., Wu, R., & Bentler, P. M. (2011). Ridge structural equation modeling with correlation matrices for ordinal and continuous data. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 64, 107–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2017). Improving the convergence rate and speed of Fisher-scoring algorithm: Ridge and anti-ridge methods in structural equation modeling. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 69, 571–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar