semlbci: An R package for Forming Likelihood-Based Confidence Intervals for Parameter Estimates, Correlations, Indirect Effects, and Other Derived Parameters

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2021). Amos. (Version 26.0) [Computer Program]. IBM SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T. (2020, June 3). Multi-level confidence intervals [Discussion post]. http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/12/26884.html?1591227383
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction. https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. (2001). Statistical inference (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2009a). Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 425–438. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2009b). Constructing approximate confidence intervals for parameters with structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R., & Hinkley, D. V. (1974). Theoretical statistics. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Hastie, T. (2016). Computer age statistical inference: Algorithms, evidence, and data science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, C. F. (2018). Are robust standard errors the best approach for interval estimation with nonnormal data in structural equation modeling? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25, 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1367254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, C. F., & Biesanz, J. C. (2015). Inference and interval estimation methods for indirect effects with latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22, 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2001). Testing parameters in structural equation modeling: Every “one” matters. Psychological Methods, 6, 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.6.3.258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. W., & Veall, M. R. (1985). Formulating Wald tests of nonlinear restrictions. Econometrica, 53, 1465–1468. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd Ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. G. (n.d). The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package. Retrieved January 10, 2023, from http://github.com/stevengj/nlopt
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, D. (1994). Algorithm 733: TOMP–Fortran modules for optimal control calculations. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 20, 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1145/192115.192124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeker, W. Q., & Escobar, L. A. (1995). Teaching about approximate confidence regions based on maximum likelihood estimation. The American Statistician, 49, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (version 8). Muthén and Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., Hunter, M. D., Pritikin, J. N., Zahery, M., Brick, T. R., Kirkpatrick, R. M., Estabrook, R., Bates, T. C., Maes, H. H., & Boker, S. M. (2016). OpenMx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., & Miller, M. B. (1997). The use of likelihood-based confidence intervals in genetic models. Behavior Genetics, 27, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025681223921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawitan, Y. (2001). In all likelihood: Statistical modelling and inference using likelihood. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pek, J., & Wu, H. (2015). Profile likelihood-based confidence intervals and regions for structural equation models. Psychometrika, 80, 1123–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9461-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesigan, I. J. A., & Cheung, S. F. (2020). SEM-based methods to form confidence intervals for indirect effect: Still applicable given nonnormality, under certain conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 571928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritikin, J. N., Rappaport, L. M., & Neale, M. C. (2017). Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a parameter with an upper or lower bound. Structural Equation Modeling : A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1275969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications (2nd Ed.). Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v048i02 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi sample analysis of moment structures. In R. D. H. Heijmans, D. S. G. Pollock, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis. Advanced studies in theoretical and applied econometrics (Vol. 36). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Savalei, V. (2010). Expected versus observed information in SEM with incomplete normal and nonnormal data. Psychological Methods, 15, 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savalei, V. (2014). Understanding robust corrections in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2010). Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research, 37, 801–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54, 426–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/1990256
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Neale, M. C. (2012). Adjusted confidence intervals for a bounded parameter. Behavior Genetics, 42, 886–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-012-9560-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ypma, J., Johnson, S. G., Borchers, H. W., Eddelbuettel, D., Ripley, B., Hornik, K., Chiquet, J., Adler, A., Dai, X., Stamm, A., & Ooms, J. (2022). nloptr: R Interface to NLopt. R package version 2.0.3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nloptr
   Google Scholar
• Yung, Y.-F., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 195–226). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar