Studying Between-Subject Differences in Trends and Dynamics: Introducing the Random Coefficients Continuous-Time Latent Curve Model with Structured Residuals

References

• Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25, 359–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianconcini, S., & Bollen, K. A. (2018). The latent variable-autoregressive latent trajectory model: A general framework for longitudinal data analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25, 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1426467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boker, S. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2009). Issues in intraindividual variability: Individual differences in equilibria and dynamics over multiple time scales. Psychology and Aging, 24, 858–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Latent curve models. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471746096
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G. L., & Meng, X.‑L. (Eds.) (2011). Chapman & Hall. Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo. CRC Press. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=762505
   Google Scholar
• Cagney, K. A., & Lauderdale, D. S. (2002). Education, wealth, and cognitive function in later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, P163–P172. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.2.P163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerhan, J. R., Folsom, A. R., Mortimer, J. A., Shahar, E., Knopman, D. S., McGovern, P. G., Hays, M. A., Crum, L. D., & Heiss, G. (1998). Correlates of cognitive function in middle-aged adults. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Gerontology, 44, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000021991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., & Bollen, K. A. (2001). The best of both worlds: Combining autoregressive and latent curve models. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 107–135). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10409-004
   Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J., Corley, J., Gow, A. J., Harris, S. E., Houlihan, L. M., Marioni, R. E., Penke, L., Rafnsson, S. B., & Starr, J. M. (2009). Age-associated cognitive decline. British Medical Bulletin, 92, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldp033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deboeck, P. R., & Boulton, A. J. (2016). Integration of stochastic differential equations using structural equation modeling: A method to facilitate model fitting and pedagogy. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 888–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1218763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delsing, M. J. M. H., & Oud, J. H. L. (2008). Analyzing reciprocal relationships by means of the continuous-time autoregressive latent trajectory model. Statistica Neerlandica, 62, 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2007.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormann, C., Guthier, C., & Cortina, J. M. (2020). Introducing continuous time meta-analysis (CoTiMA). Organizational Research Methods, 23, 620–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (2018a). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modeling. Psychological Methods, 23, 774–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (2018b). Understanding the time course of interventions with continuous time dynamic models. In K. Van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & M. C. Voelkle (Eds.), Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 79–109). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77219-6_4
   Google Scholar
• Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (2021). Hierarchical continuous time modeling. In The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 887–908). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813995-0.00034-0
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. G., Stachowski, A., Infurna, F. J., Faul, J. D., Grosch, J., & Tetrick, L. E. (2014). Mental work demands, retirement, and longitudinal trajectories of cognitive functioning. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall; CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16018
   Google Scholar
• Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, J., Kogan, A., Quoidbach, J., & Mauss, I. B. (2013). Happiness is best kept stable: Positive emotion variability is associated with poorer psychological health. Emotion, 13, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan-Rietdijk, S. d., Voelkle, M. C., Keijsers, L., & Hamaker, E. L. (2017). Discrete- vs. Continuous-time modeling of unequally spaced experience sampling method data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1849. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, K., Hecht, M., Oud, J. H. L., & Voelkle, M. C. (2019). Where have the persons gone? – An illustration of individual score methods in autoregressive panel models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1517355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and Retirement Study (2022a). Cross-wave imputation of cognitive functioning measures 1992–2018, version 7.0, public use dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740).
   Google Scholar
• Health and Retirement Study (2022b). Cross-wave tracker file, version 1.0, public use dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740).
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., Hardt, K., Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (2019). Bayesian continuous-time Rasch models. Psychological Methods, 24, 516–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., Horstmann, K. T., Arnold, M., Sherman, R. A., & Voelkle, M. C. (2022). Modeling dynamic personality theories in a continuous-time framework: An illustration. Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Voelkle, M. C. (2021). Continuous-time modeling in prevention research: An illustration. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419885026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Zitzmann, S. (2020). A computationally more efficient Bayesian approach for estimating continuous-time models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1719107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Zitzmann, S. (2021a). Exploring the unfolding of dynamic effects with continuous-time models: Recommendations concerning statistical power to detect peak cross-lagged effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 894–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1914627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Zitzmann, S. (2021b). Sample size recommendations for continuous-time models: Compensating shorter time series with larger numbers of persons and vice versa. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1779069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. D., & Gelman, A. (2011). The No-U-turn sampler: Adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 1593–1623. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1111.4246
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009057745
   Google Scholar
• Jindra, C., Sachse, K. A., & Hecht, M. (2022). Dynamics between reading and math proficiency over time in secondary education – Observational evidence from continuous time models. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 10, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00136-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, F., & Fletcher, B. C. (1996). Taking work home: A study of daily fluctuations in work stressors, effects on moods and impacts on marital partners. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongerling, J., Laurenceau, J. ‑P., & Hamaker, E. L. (2015). A multilevel AR(1) model: Allowing for inter-individual differences in trait-scores, inertia, and innovation variance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.1003772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (1995). The trait-state-error model for multiwave data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.1.52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koval, P., Pe, M. L., Meers, K., & Kuppens, P. (2013). Affect dynamics in relation to depressive symptoms: Variable, unstable or inert? Emotion, 13, 1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koval, P., Sütterlin, S., & Kuppens, P. (2015). Emotional inertia is associated with lower well-being when controlling for differences in emotional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper, R. M., & Ryan, O. (2020). Meta-analysis of lagged regression models: A continuous-time approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1652613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppens, P., Allen, N. B., & Sheeber, L. B. (2010). Emotional inertia and psychological maladjustment. Psychological Science, 21, 984–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610372634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. J. S., Tilling, K., Gordon-Smith, K., Saunders, K. E. A., Di Florio, A., Jones, L., Jones, I., O‘Donovan, M. C., & Heron, J. (2022). The dynamic interplay between sleep and mood: An intensive longitudinal study of individuals with bipolar disorder. Psychological Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721005377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, J. F., Zitzmann, S., Voelkle, M. C., & Hecht, M. (2022). A primer on continuous-time modeling in educational research: An exemplary application of a continuous-time latent curve model with structured residuals (CT-LCM-SR) to PISA Data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 10, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00126-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2021). A comparison of penalized maximum likelihood estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques for estimating confirmatory factor analysis models with small sample sizes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 615162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S. W. S., Li, S. ‑C., & Bäckman, L. (2009). Neural underpinnings of within-person variability in cognitive functioning. Psychology and Aging, 24, 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., Fisher, G. G., & Kadlec, K. M. (2007). Latent variable analyses of age trends of cognition in the Health and Retirement Study, 1992–2004. Psychology and Aging, 22, 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2019). Two-level dynamic structural equation models with small samples. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 948–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1578657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nopoulos, P., Flashman, L., Flaum, M., Arndt, S., & Andreasen, N. (1994). Stability of cognitive functioning early in the course of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 14, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-9964(94)90006-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez-Regueiro, F., Juhel, J., Bressoux, P., & Nurra, C. (2022). Identifying reciprocities in school motivation research: A review of issues and solutions associated with cross-lagged effects models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114, 945–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., & Delsing, M. J. M. H. (2010). Continuous time modeling of panel data by means of SEM. In K. Van Montfort, J. H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal research with latent variables (pp. 201–244). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11760-2_7
   Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of sem. Psychometrika, 65, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., & Voelkle, M. C. (2014). Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling. Quality & Quantity, 48, 3271–3288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9955-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrisius, C., Gaspard, H., Zitzmann, S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2022). The “situative nature” of competence and value beliefs and the predictive power of autonomy support: A multilevel investigation of repeated observations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114, 791–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, G. G., Helms, M. J., & Plassman, B. L. (2008). Associations of job demands and intelligence with cognitive performance among men in late life. Neurology, 70, 1803–1808. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000295506.58497.7e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2010). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed. [Nachdr.], Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences, Vol. 1). Sage Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, W. L., Ofstedal, M. B., & Herzog, A. R. (2003). Trends in scores on tests of cognitive ability in the elderly U.S. population, 1993–2000. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, S338–S346. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.S338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y., & Loh, W. W. (2022). A structural after measurement approach to structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovine, M. J., & Walls, T. A. (2006). Multilevel autoregressive modeling of interindividual differences in the stability of a process. In T. A. Walls & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 124–147). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195173444.003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, O., & Hamaker, E. L. (2022). Time to intervene: A continuous-time approach to network analysis and centrality. Psychometrika, 87, 214–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09767-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, O., Kuiper, R. M., & Hamaker, E. L. (2018). A continuous-time approach to intensive longitudinal data: What, why, and how? In K. Van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & M. C. Voelkle (Eds.), Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 27–54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77219-6_2
   Google Scholar
• Scherr, P. A., Albert, M. S., Funkenstein, H. H., Cook, N. R., Hennekens, C. H., Branch, L. G., White, L. R., Taylor, J. O., & Evans, D. A. (1988). Correlates of cognitive function in an elderly community population. American Journal of Epidemiology, 128, 1084–1101. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultzberg, M., & Muthén, B. (2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25, 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1392862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. K., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019). Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling. Psychological Methods, 24, 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivo, S., Fan, X., & Witta, L. (2005). The biasing effects of unmodeled ARMA time series processes on latent growth curve model estimates. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1202_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnega, A., Faul, J. D., Ofstedal, M. B., Langa, K. M., Phillips, J. W. R., & Weir, D. R. (2014). Cohort profile: The Health and Retirement Study (HRS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 43, 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. (2022). RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.21.7. https://mc-stan.org/
   Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., & Oud, J. H. L. (2013). Continuous time modelling with individually varying time intervals for oscillating and non-oscillating processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02043.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods, 17, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, T. A., & Schafer, J. L. (Eds.) (2006). Models for intensive longitudinal data. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195173444.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. P., Hamaker, E. L., & Bergeman, C. S. (2012). Investigating inter-individual differences in short-term intra-individual variability. Psychological Methods, 17, 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, S., Garcia, J. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2015). Experience-sampling research methods and their potential for education research. Educational Researcher, 44, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14566879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzmann, S., & Helm, C. (2021). Multilevel analysis of mediation, moderation, and nonlinear effects in small samples, using expected a posteriori estimates of factor scores. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1855076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar