GSCA Pro—Free Stand-Alone Software for Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Aittomäki, A., Lahelma, E., & Roos, E. (2003). Work conditions and socioeconomic inequalities in work ability. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 29, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables. Psychometrika, 45, 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2011). Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, 35, 359–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2019). Model implied instrumental variables (MIIVs): An alternative orientation to structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1483224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boubker, O., & Douayri, K. (2020). Dataset on the relationship between consumer satisfaction, brand attitude, brand preference and purchase intentions of dairy product: The case of the Laayoune-Sakia El Hamra region in Morocco. Data in Brief, 32, 106172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Burgess, J., Corbetta, M., Crawford, K., Duflo, E., Fogarty, L., Gopnik, A., Hanafi, S., Herrero, M., Hong, Y.-Y., Kameyama, Y., Lee, T. M. C., Leung, G. M., Nagin, D. S., Nobre, A. C., Nordentoft, M., Okbay, A., Perfors, A., Rival, L. M., … Wagner, C. (2022). The future of human behaviour research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01275-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, F. C., Maslin, T. S., & Armstrong, T. (2009). Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 6, 790–804. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.6.6.790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1977). Regression analysis by example. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. (pp. 295–336). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., & Choi, J. Y. (2020). An empirical comparison of generalized structured component analysis and partial least squares path modeling under variance-based structural equation models. Behaviormetrika, 47, 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-019-00098-0
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., & Hwang, H. (2023a). Deep learning generalized structured component analysis: A knowledge-based multivariate predictive method. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. Advance Online Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., & Hwang, H. (2023b). Structured factor analysis: A data matrix-based alternative approach to structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30, 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2126360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Hwang, H. (2021). Generalized structured component analysis accommodating convex components. [Paper presentation] 2021 Annual Meeting of Statistical Society of Canada, Virtual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00089-1
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Jung, K., & Hwang, H. (2019). Out-of-bag prediction error: A cross validation index for generalized structured component analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54, 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1540340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Sarstedt, M., & Hwang, H. (2022). A comparative evaluation of factor- and component-based structural equation modeling methods under (in)consistent model specifications. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 75, 220–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Schlaegel, C., Hwang, H., Choi, Y., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Integrated generalized structured component analysis: On the use of model fit criteria in international management research. Management International Review, 62, 569–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00479-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. Y., & Hwang, H. (2020). Bayesian generalized structured component analysis. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 73, 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, S., Saks, A. M., & Zikic, J. (2006). Trait affect and job search outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croon, M. (2002). Using predicted latent scores in general latent structure models. In G. A. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and latent structure models. (pp. 195–223). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802843
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K. (2011). Consistent partial least squares estimators for linear and polynomial factor models, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3997.0405
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K. (2013). Composites as factors, generalized canonical variables revisited, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3426.5449
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K. (2017). A perfect match between a model and a mode. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. (pp. 55–80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_4
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J, University of Groningen (2015b). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39, 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015a). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 81, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drolet, A. L., & Morrison, D. G. (2001). Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research? Journal of Service Research, 3, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050133001
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29, 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, O., Liehr-Gobbers, K., & Krafft, M. (2010). Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. (pp. 691–711). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_30
   Google Scholar
• Guyon, H., Kop, J.-L., Juhel, J., & Falissard, B. (2018). Measurement, ontology, and epistemology: Psychology needs pragmatism-realism. Theory and Psychology, 28, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318761606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31, 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Cho, G. (2020). Global least squares path modeling: A full-information alternative to partial least squares path modeling. Psychometrika, 85, 947–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09733-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Takane, Y. (2004). Generalized structured component analysis. Psychometrika, 69, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Takane, Y. (2014). Generalized structured component analysis: A component-based approach to structural equation modeling. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Cho, G., & Choo, H. (2023). GSCA Pro for Window User’s Manual, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28162.61127/1
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Cho, G., Jung, K., Falk, C. F., Flake, J. K., Jin, M. J., & Lee, S. H. (2021). An approach to structural equation modeling with both factors and components: Integrated generalized structured component analysis. Psychological Methods, 26, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Desarbo, W. S., & Takane, Y. (2007). Fuzzy clusterwise generalized structured component analysis. Psychometrika, 72, 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1314-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., Cho, G., Choo, H., & Ringle, C. M. (2023). A primer on integrated generalized structured component analysis. European Business Review, 35, 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2022-0224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Takane, Y., & Jung, K. (2017). Generalized structured component analysis with uniqueness terms for accommodating measurement error. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 374, 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences. (pp. 255–284). Seminar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 43, 443–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: Historical and comparative aspects. In H. Wold & K. G. Jöreskog (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, part I. (pp. 263–270). North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, Y. H., Nam, Y. H., & Ryu, J.-J. (2011). Relationships among socioeconomic status, health behavior, health status and job satisfaction. Disability and Employment, 21, 187–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, K., Lee, J., Gupta, V., & Cho, G. (2019). Comparison of bootstrap confidence interval methods for GSCA using a Monte Carlo simulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (4th ed.). Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-56948-000
   Google Scholar
• Le, S. T., & Dang, C. X. (2022). Data for the link between HEXACO personality traits and job search outcomes in Vietnam. Data in Brief, 45, 108677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. P., & Le, S. T. (2019). Predictors and outcomes of Vietnamese university graduates’ networking behavior as job seekers. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, T. G. (1992). Advances in body composition assessment. Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611–637. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., & McDonald, R. P. (1984). Some algebraic properties of the reticular action model for moment structures. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00802.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23, 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., van Bork, R., & Borsboom, D. (2020). Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models. Psychological Methods, 25, 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On comparing results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five perspectives and five recommendations. Marketing ZFP, 39, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-4
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, E., Schuberth, F., & Jörg Henseler, J. (2021). HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121, 2637–2650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., Sarstedt, M., Shmueli, G., Kim, K. H., & Thiele, K. O. (2019). PLS-based model selection: The role of alternative explanations in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 346–397. https://doi.org/10.17005/1.jais.00538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Laake, P. (2001). Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika, 66, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M. (2008). Component-based structural equation modelling. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 19, 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802159543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Maas, H. L. J., Kan, K.-J., & Borsboom, D. (2014). Intelligence is what the intelligence test measures. Seriously. Journal of Intelligence, 2, 12–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence2010012
   Google Scholar
• von Zimmermann, C., Winkelmann, M., Richter-Schmidinger, T., Mühle, C., Kornhuber, J., & Lenz, B. (2020). Physical activity and body composition are associated with severity and risk of depression, and serum lipids. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar