The emergent genre of campaign e-mail in the 2008 presidential nomination campaign

References

• Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212. doi:10.1093/applin/22.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, B. R., Lynch, J. A., Bevan, J. L., & Condit, C. M. (2005). Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: A focus group study of public understandings of genetic research. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 331–344. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freeman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2004). Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), What writing does and how it does it (pp. 309–333). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10(4), 475–509. doi:10.1177/0741088393010004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2000). The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication, 17, 329–333. doi:10.1080/10584600050178924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1978). Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). Deeds done in words: Presidential rhetoric and the genres of governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Presidents creating the presidency: Deeds done in words. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charland, M. (1987). Constitutive rhetoric: The case of the peuple québécois. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73(2), 133–150. doi:10.1080/00335638709383799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt, A. (1993). Generalizing about genre: New conceptions of an old concept. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 573–586. doi:10.2307/358391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R. P. (1994). Wandering with rhetorical criticism. In W. Nothstine, C. Blair, & G. Copeland (Eds.), Critical questions: Invention, creativity and the criticism of discourse and media (pp. 71–81). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. M. H. (1973). Generic constraints and the rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 6(3), 162–170.
   Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L. (2006). Political web wars: The use of the web for political advertising. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The Internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004 (pp. 67–82). Washington, DC: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2006). The age of reasons: Motives for using different components of the Internet for political information. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The Internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004 (pp. 147–168). Washington, DC: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Killoran, J. B. (2006). Self-published web resumes: Their purposes and their genre systems. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20(4), 425–459. doi:10.1177/1050651906290267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostelnick, C., & Hassett, M. (2003). Shaping information: The rhetoric of visual conventions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R., & Shepherd, D. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs, 18(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, P. (2012, February 7). Political perceptions email fundraising too forward. WSJ Washington Wire. Retrieved from http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/07/02/political-perceptions-email-fundraising-too-forward/
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. (2012, November 7). Inside the secret world of the data crunchers who helped Obama win. Time. Retrieved from http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/07/inside-the-secret-world-of-quants-and-data-crunchers-who-helped-obama-win/2/.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. A. (2006). Web campaigning by US presidential primary candidates in 2000 and 2004. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The Internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004 (pp. 21–37). Washington, DC: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, E. (2008). Innovation or normalization in e-campaigning?: A longitudinal content and structural analysis of German party websites in the 2002 and 2005 national elections. European Journal of Communication, 23(4), 449–470. doi:10.1177/0267323108096994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2009, April 15). The Internet’s role in campaign 2008. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2009/04/15/the-internets-role-in-campaign-2008-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2012, April 5). Spamalot. The Daily Show. Retrieved from http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-­-april-­-5-­-2012/spamalot.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (2005). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, J. A. (2008, November 20). Obama raised half a billion online. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/11/obama-raised-half-a-billion-on.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wiese, D. R., & Gronbeck, B. E. (2005). Campaign 2004 developments in cyberpolitics. In R. E. Denton Jr. (Ed.), The 2004 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 217–240). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. P. (2006). Self-referential and opponent-based framing: Candidate e-mail strategies in campaign 2004. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The Internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004 (pp. 83–98). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. P., & Trammell, K. D. (2005). Candidate campaign e-mail messages in the presidential election 2004. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 560–574. doi:10.1177/0002764205279438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar