References
- Andrejevic, M. (2011). The work that affective economics does. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 604–620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600551
- Arnett, J. J. (1995). Adolescents’ uses of media for self-socialization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24(5), 519–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537054
- Balleys, C., Millerand, F., Thoër, C., & Duque, N. (2020). Searching for oneself on YouTube: Teenage peer socialization and social recognition processes. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 205630512090947. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120909474
- Bärtl, M. (2018). YouTube channels, uploads and views: A statistical analysis of the past 10 years. Convergence, 24(1), 16–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736979
- boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
- Buckingham, D. (2008). Introducing identity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 1–22). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Buckingham, D. (2013). Making sense of the ‘digital generation’: Growing up with digital media. Self & Society, 40(3), 7–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03060497.2013.11084274
- Buckingham, D., Pini, M., & Willett, R. (2009). Take back the tube!’ The discursive construction of amateur film- and video-making. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Video cultures: Media technology and everyday creativity (pp. 51–70). London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009a). The entrepreneurial vlogger: Participatory culture beyond the professional-amateur divide. In P. Snickars & P. Vonderau (Eds.), The YouTube reader (pp. 89–107). Stockholm, Sweden: National Library of Sweden.
- Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009b). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
- Delicado, A., & Alves, N. A. (2010). Children, internet cultures and online social networks. In S. Octobre & R. Sirota (Eds.), Actes du colloque enfance et cultures: Regards des sciences humaines et sociales (pp. 1-12). Paris, France: Université Paris Descartes . Retrieved from https://www.culture.gouv.fr/content/download/17471/file/Actes-Enfanceetcultures-global.pdf
- EU Kids Online. (2014). EU Kids Online: Findings, methods, recommendations ( Deliverable D1.6). Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60512/
- Fägersten, K. B. (2017). The role of swearing in creating an online persona: The case of YouTuber PewDiePie. Discourse, Context & Media, 18, 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.04.002
- García Jiménez, A., Catalina García, B., & López de Ayala, M. C. (2016). Adolescents and YouTube: Creation, participation and consumption [Special issue 1 – Teens and ads]. Revista Prisma Social, 60–89. Retrieved from https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/1314
- Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms.’ New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
- Grossman, L. (2006, December 25). You – Yes, you – Are TIME’s person of the year. TIME. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570810,00.html
- Henriksen, D., & Hoelting, M. (2017). Creativity on YouTube. Considering new media and the impulses of the learner. In I. Eleá & L. Mikos (Eds.), Young & creative. Digital technologies empowering children in everyday life (pp. 31–41). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
- Holland, M. (2017). How YouTube developed into a successful platform for user-generated content. In I. Eleá & L. Mikos (Eds.), Young & creative. Digital technologies empowering children in everyday life (pp. 53–64). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
- Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
- Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
- Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.
- Jenkins, H., Shresthova, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2016). Superpowers to the people! How young activists are tapping the civic imagination. In E. Gordon & P. Mihailidis (Eds.), Civic media (pp. 295–320). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024
- Kim, J. (2012). The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 34(1), 53–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711427199
- Lange, P. G. (2014). Kids on YouTube: Technical identities and digital literacies. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
- Leith, A. P. (2021). Parasocial cues: The ubiquity of parasocial relationships on Twitch. Communication Monographs, 88(1), 111–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1868544
- Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089415
- Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2012). Theoretical framework for children’s internet use. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon, & A. Görzig (Eds.), Children, risk and safety on the internet (pp. 1–14). Bristol, United Kingdom: The Policy Press.
- Lüders, M. (2011). Why and how online sociability became part and parcel of teenage life. In M. Consalvo & C. Ess (Eds.), The handbook of internet studies (pp. 452–468). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Marôpo, L., Jorge, A., & Tomaz, R. (2020). “I felt like I was talking to you!”: Intimacy and trust among teen vloggers and followers in Portugal and Brazil. Journal of Children and Media, 14(1), 23–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.1699589
- Marwick, A. E. (2019). The algorithmic celebrity: The future of internet fame and microcelebrity studies. In C. Abidin & M. L. Brown (Eds.), Microcelebrity around the globe: Approaches to cultures of internet fame (pp. 161–169). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.
- Mesch, G. (2013). Internet media and peer sociability. In D. Lemish (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents and media (pp. 287–294). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
- Nag, W., Ling, R., & Jakobsen, M. H. (2016). Keep out! Join in! Cross-generation communication on the mobile internet in Norway. Journal of Children and Media, 10(4), 411–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1203808
- Papacharissi, Z. (2011). A networked self. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 304–318). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Pereira, S., Fillol, J., & Moura, P. (2019). Young people learning from digital media outside of school: The informal meets the formal. Comunicar, 27(58), 41–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-04
- Pereira, S., Moura, P., & Fillol, J. (2018a). The YouTubers Phenomenon: What makes YouTube stars so popular for young people? Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 17, 107–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc201817107123
- Pereira, S., Moura, P., Masanet, M.-J., Taddeo, G., & Tirocchi, S. (2018b). Media uses and production practices: Case study with teens from Portugal, Spain and Italy. Comunicación y Sociedad, 33, 89–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i33.7091
- Pereira, S., Pereira, L., & Melro, A. (2015a). The Portuguese programme one laptop per child: Political, educational and social impact. In S. Pereira (Ed.), Digital literacy, technology and social inclusion (pp. 29–100). Ribeirão, Portugal: Húmus.
- Pereira, S., Pinto, M., & Moura, P. (2015b). Níveis de Literacia Mediática: Estudo Exploratório com Jovens do 12.° Ano. Braga, Portugal: CECS.
- Pérez-Torres, V., Pastor-Ruiz, Y., & Ben-Boubaker, S. A. (2018). YouTubers videos and the construction of adolescent identity. Comunicar, 55, 61–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-06
- Pink, S., & Ardévol, E. (2018). Ethnographic strategies for revealing teens’ transmedia skills and practices. In C. A. Scolari (Ed.), Teens, media and collaborative cultures: Exploiting teens' transmedia skills in the classroom (pp. 108–117). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/34245
- Pires, F., Masanet, M.-J., & Scolari, C. A. (2021). What are teens doing with YouTube? Practices, uses and metaphors of the most popular audio-visual platform. Information, Communication & Society, 24(9), 1175–1191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1672766
- Rieder, B., Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Coromina, Ò. (2018). From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’: Investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence, 24(1), 50–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736982
- Schäfer, M. T. (2011). Bastard culture! How user participation transforms cultural production. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
- Scolari, C. A., & Fraticelli, D. (2019). The case of the top Spanish YouTubers: Emerging media subjects and discourse practices in the new media ecology. Convergence, 25(3), 496–515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517721807
- Tur-Viñes, V., Núñez-Gómez, P., & Martínez-Pastor, E. (2019). YouTube, menores y cultura colaborativa. Revisión bibliográfica de la investigación académica. História Y Comunicación Social, 24(1), 331–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.5209/HICS.64498
- Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020
- Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245
- Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
- Van Es, K. (2020). YouTube’s operational logic: “The view” as pervasive category. Television & New Media, 21(3), 223–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418818986
- YouTube. (2022, January 5). Terms of service. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/t/terms
- YouTube. (n.d.). About YouTube. Retrieved from https://about.youtube/