The “ultimate empathy machine” as technocratic solutionism? Audience reception of the distant refugee crisis through virtual reality

References

• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, G., & Milk, C. (2015). Clouds over Sidra [ Video file]. Retrieved from https://with.in/watch/clouds-over-sidra/
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1996). The perfect crime. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Benthall, J. (2010). Disasters, relief and the media. Herefordshire: Sean Kingston Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (2002). Talking of the royal family. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (1999). Distant suffering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, D. J., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, M., Scott, M., & Wright, K. (2019). Humanitarian journalism. In C. Carpenter (Ed.), Oxford research Encyclopedia of communication (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., & Winters, K. (2008). Understanding men’s and women’s political interests: Evidence from a study of gendered political attitudes. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18(1), 53–74. doi:10.1080/17457280701858623
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2008). The media as moral education: Mediation and action. Media, Culture & Society, 30(6), 831–852. doi:10.1177/0163443708096096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2010). Post-humanitarianism: Humanitarian communication beyond a politics of pity. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(2), 107–126. doi:10.1177/1367877909356720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2011). “Improper distance”: Towards a critical account of solidarity as irony. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(4), 363–381. doi:10.1177/1367877911403247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The ironic spectator. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2021). Victimhood: The affective politics of vulnerability. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 10–27. doi:10.1177/1367549420979316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., & Blaagaard, B. (2013). Introduction: Cosmopolitanism and the new news media. Journalism Studies, 14(2), 150–155. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.718542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Cottle, S. (2014). Rethinking media and disasters in a global age: What’s changed and why it matters. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 3–22. doi:10.1177/1750635213513229
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., & Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement: Beyond the presumption of attention. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2018). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 1–14. doi:10.1177/1527476418796632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Peña, N., Weil, P., Llobera, J., Spanlang, B., Friedman, D., Sanchez-Vives, M., & Slater, M. (2010). Immersive journalism: Immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19(4), 291–301. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruenewald, T., & Witteborn, S. (2020). Feeling good: Humanitarian virtual reality film, emotional style and global citizenship. Cultural Studies, 35(2), 1–21. doi:10.1080/09502386.2020.1761415
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, R. (2019). Digitality, virtual reality and the “Empathy machine.” Digital Journalism, 8(2), 1–19. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1517604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höijer, B. (2004). The discourse of global compassion: The audience and media reporting of human suffering. Media, Culture & Society, 26(4), 513–531. doi:10.1177/0163443704044215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiberts, E. (2019). Watching disaster news online and offline: Audiences experiencing news about far-away disasters in a postbroadcast society. Television & New Media, 21(1), 41–59. doi:10.1177/1527476418821328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiberts, E., & Joye, S. (2019). Who cares for the suffering other? A survey-based study into reactions toward images of distant suffering. International Communication Gazette, 81(68), 562–579. doi:10.1177/1748048518825324
   Google Scholar
• IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Ridder, H., Freeman, J., & Avons, S. E. (2000). Presence: Concept, determinants, and measurement. Proceedings of the SPIE, 3959 . San Jose, 520–529. doi:10.1117/12.387188
   Google Scholar
• Irom, B. (2018). Virtual reality and the Syrian refugee camps: Humanitarian communication and the politics of empathy. International Journal of Communication, 2018(12), 4269–4291. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8783
   Google Scholar
• Irom, B. (2021). Virtual reality and celebrity humanitarianism: Rashida Jones in Lebanon media. Culture & Society, 1–17. doi:10.1177/01634437211022725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2017). Disrupting the narrative: Immersive journalism in virtual reality. Journal of Media Practice, 18(2–3), 171–185. doi:10.1080/14682753.2017.1374677
   Google Scholar
• Joye, S. (2013). Research on mediated suffering within social sciences: Expert views on identifying a disciplinary home and research agenda. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 38(2), 106–121. doi:10.1179/0308018813Z.00000000039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkakorpi, M., & Pantti, M. (2020). A sense of place: VR journalism and emotional engagement. Journalism Practice, 15(6), 785–802. doi:10.1080/17512786.2020.1799237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurasawa, F. (2013). The sentimentalist paradox: On the normative and visual foundations of humanitarianism. Journal of Global Ethics, 9(2), 201–214. doi:10.1080/17449626.2013.818461
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakidou, M. (2014). Distant suffering in audience memory: The moral hierarchy of remembering. International Journal of Communication, 2014(8), 1474–1494. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2465
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakidou, M. (2015). Media witnessing: Exploring the audience of distant suffering. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 215–231. doi:10.1177/0163443714557981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakidou, M. (2021). The audience of humanitarian communication. In L. Chouliaraki & A. Vestergaard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of humanitarian communication (pp. 89–103). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (1998). Audience research at the crossroads: The “implied audience” in media and cultural theory. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(2), 193–217. doi:10.1177/136754949800100203
   Google Scholar
• Lugrin, J., Latt, J., & Latoschik, M. E. (2015). Avatar anthropomorphism and illusion of body ownership in VR. Proceedings of 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality. doi:10.1109/VR.2015.7223379
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (1996). Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 79–98. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madianou, M. (2019). Technocolonialism: Digital innovation and data practices in the humanitarian response to refugee crises. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1–13. doi:10.1177/2056305119863146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschio, T. (2017). Storyliving: An ethnographic study of how audiences experience VR and what that means for journalists. Google News Lab.
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts, J. (2018). Are we there yet? Media content and sense of presence in non-fiction virtual reality. Studies in Documentary Film, 12(2), 101–118. doi:10.1080/17503280.2017.1344924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, K. (2018). Virtual reality witness: Exploring the ethics of mediated presence. Studies in Documentary Film, 12(2), 1750–3280. doi:10.1080/17503280.2017.1340796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. N., & Sheets, P. (2019). Virtual hype meets reality: Users’ perception of immersive journalism. Journalism, 22(10), 2637–2653. doi:10.1177/1464884919869399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyers, P. (2010). No one is illegal between city and nation. Studies in Social Justice, 4(2), 127–143. doi:10.26522/ssj.v4i2.998
   Google Scholar
• Ong, J. C. (2015). The poverty of television: The mediation of suffering in class-divided Philippines. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orgad, S., & Seu, B. (2014). “Intimacy at a distance” in humanitarian communication. Media, Culture & Society, 36(7), 916–934. doi:10.1177/0163443714536077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, L. (2020). “Breaking free” from the frame: International human rights and The New York Times’ 360-degree video journalism. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 386–403. doi:10.1080/21670811.2019.1709982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantti, M. (2015). Grassroots humanitarianism on YouTube: Ordinary fundraisers, unlikely donors, and global solidarity. International Communication Gazette, 77(7), 622–636. doi:10.1177/1748048515601556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, A. B., & Coelho, A. F. V. C. C. (2018). Virtual reality and journalism. A gateway to conceptualizing immersive journalism. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 1090–1100. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1502046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Laws, A. L. (2017). Can immersive journalism enhance empathy? Digital Journalism, 8(2), 1–16. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1389286
   Google Scholar
• Schieferdecker, D. (2021). Passivity in the face of distant others’ suffering: An integrated model to explain behavioral (non)response. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(1), 20–38. doi:10.1080/23808985.2021.1908837
   Google Scholar
• Schlembach, R., & Clewer, N. (2021). “Forced empathy”: Manipulation, trauma and affect in virtual reality film. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(5), 827–843. doi:10.1177/13678779211007863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. (2014). The mediation of distant suffering: An empirical contribution beyond television news texts. Media, Culture & Society, 36(1), 3–19. doi:10.1177/0163443713507811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. (2015). Distant suffering online: The unfortunate irony of cyber-utopian narratives. International Communication Gazette, 77(7), 637–653. doi:10.1177/1748048515601557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M., Wright, K., & Bunce, M. (2021). The politics of humanitarian journalism. In L. Chouliaraki & A. Vestergaard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of humanitarian communication (pp. 203–219). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seu, I. B. (2010). “doing denial”: Audience reaction to human rights appeals. Discourse & Society, 21(4), 438–457. doi:10.1177/0957926510366199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seu, I. B., & Orgad, S. (2017). Caring in crisis? Humanitarianism, the public and NGOs. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Computers in Human Behaviour, 2018(78), 64–73. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D., & Biocca, F. (2017). Exploring immersive experience in journalism. New Media & Society, 20(8), 1–24. doi:10.1177/1461444817733133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siapera, E. (2017). Understanding new media. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. (2002). Regulation and the ethics of distance: Distance and the ethics of regulation. In R. Mansell, R. Samjiva, & A. Mahav (Eds.), Networking knowledge for information societies: Institutions & intervention (pp. 279–285). Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality. On the rise of the Mediapolis. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Skarbez, R., Brooks, F. P., & Whitton, M. C. (2017). A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(6), 1–39. doi:10.1145/3134301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616. doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavinoha, L. (2019). Communicative acts of citizenship: Contesting Europe’s border in and through the media. International Journal of Communication, 2019(13), 1212–1230. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10428
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, J. H., Gaskin, J. E., Meservy, T. O., Jenkins, J. L., & Wolman, I. (2019). Framework of affordances for virtual reality and augmented reality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(3), 683–729. doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1628877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Kang, J., & Oprean, D. (2017). Being there in the midst of the story: How immersive journalism affects our perceptions and cognitions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(11), 672–682. doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B., & Urry, J. (2006). Visuality, mobility and the cosmopolitan: Inhabiting the world from afar. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 113–132. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00096.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uskali, T., Gynnlid, A., Jones, S., & Sirkkunen, E. (2020). Immersive journalism as storytelling: Ethics, production, and design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Damme, K., All, A., De Marez, L., & van Leuven, S. (2019). 360° video journalism: Experimental study on the effect of immersion on news experience and distant suffering. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2053–2076. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2018.1561208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Engelhardt, J., & Jansz, J. (2014). Challenging humanitarian communication: An empirical exploration of kony 2012. International Communication Gazette, 76(6), 464–484. doi:10.1177/1748048514533861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, Z. (2017). VR for news: The new reality? Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. (2013). Rewire: Digital cosmopolitans in the age of connection. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar